InsiderWire Staff

Major League Baseball's Automated Ball Strike (ABS) system exposed home plate umpire Roberto Ortiz during Thursday's Tigers-Braves game, overturning one of the most obvious missed calls since the computer challenge system launched on opening day.The blown call left Tigers broadcaster Jason Benetti nearly speechless as the ABS revealed Ortiz had called a ball on a pitch that went straight down the heart of the plate.<blockquote>It is...yikes. It is the reason for the challenge system.</blockquote><h2>Pattern of Poor Performance</h2>This wasn't Ortiz's first major stumble behind the plate. The umpire has a documented history of missed calls that stretches back years. In September 2025, before Commissioner Rob Manfred instituted the ABS system, the Umpire Auditor tracking account estimated Ortiz missed 25 calls during a single Brewers-Padres game.The pattern continued in 2024, when Ump Auditor reported Ortiz missed 30 calls in a Pirates-Royals game, achieving a correct call rate of just 82.5 percent. During a 2023 game, he called a strike on a pitch that landed 5.27 inches off the plate, according to the tracking service.<h2>Fan Engagement Drives ABS Success</h2>The computer challenge system has proven surprisingly popular with baseball fans, according to Manfred. The commissioner noted that fans become riveted to stadium video boards when challenges occur, creating an unexpected form of entertainment that enhances the game experience.The ABS system allows teams to challenge umpire calls, with the computer providing the definitive ruling on whether pitches cross the strike zone. The technology aims to eliminate the human error that has plagued baseball's most fundamental call for over a century.MLB's decision to implement the challenge system appears to address both accuracy concerns and business interests simultaneously. Poor umpiring has long frustrated fans and players alike, with missed calls potentially affecting game outcomes and championship races.The league will likely expand the ABS system's role as it continues to prove its value in exposing obvious errors like Ortiz's Thursday night mistake. Expect more umpires to face similar public accountability as the technology becomes standard across all MLB stadiums.

Major League Baseball's Automated Ball Strike (ABS) system exposed home plate umpire Roberto Ortiz during Thursday's Tigers-Braves game, overturning one of the most obvious missed calls since the computer challenge system launched on opening day.

The blown call left Tigers broadcaster Jason Benetti nearly speechless as the ABS revealed Ortiz had called a ball on a pitch that went straight down the heart of the plate.

It is...yikes. It is the reason for the challenge system.

Pattern of Poor Performance

This wasn't Ortiz's first major stumble behind the plate. The umpire has a documented history of missed calls that stretches back years. In September 2025, before Commissioner Rob Manfred instituted the ABS system, the Umpire Auditor tracking account estimated Ortiz missed 25 calls during a single Brewers-Padres game.

The pattern continued in 2024, when Ump Auditor reported Ortiz missed 30 calls in a Pirates-Royals game, achieving a correct call rate of just 82.5 percent. During a 2023 game, he called a strike on a pitch that landed 5.27 inches off the plate, according to the tracking service.

Fan Engagement Drives ABS Success

The computer challenge system has proven surprisingly popular with baseball fans, according to Manfred. The commissioner noted that fans become riveted to stadium video boards when challenges occur, creating an unexpected form of entertainment that enhances the game experience.

The ABS system allows teams to challenge umpire calls, with the computer providing the definitive ruling on whether pitches cross the strike zone. The technology aims to eliminate the human error that has plagued baseball's most fundamental call for over a century.

MLB's decision to implement the challenge system appears to address both accuracy concerns and business interests simultaneously. Poor umpiring has long frustrated fans and players alike, with missed calls potentially affecting game outcomes and championship races.

The league will likely expand the ABS system's role as it continues to prove its value in exposing obvious errors like Ortiz's Thursday night mistake. Expect more umpires to face similar public accountability as the technology becomes standard across all MLB stadiums.

Umpire Roberto Ortiz missed obvious strike down the heart of the plate during Tigers-Braves game, caught by MLB's ABS system that overturned the call.

MLB's Computer Umpire Exposes Home Plate Ump's Strike Zone Disaster

President Donald Trump doubled down Friday on his support for Pete Rose's Baseball Hall of Fame induction, calling the all-time hits leader's decades-long exclusion a &quot;disservice&quot; during remarks to reporters at the White House.&quot;I think Pete Rose should have been in the Baseball Hall of Fame a long time ago,&quot; Trump said. &quot;I think baseball did a great disservice by not respecting his achievements on the field.&quot;<h2>MLB Removes Rose From Ineligible List</h2>MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred removed Rose and several other players from the ineligible list in May 2025, opening the door for Hall of Fame consideration. Manfred acknowledged Trump's advocacy played a role in the decision.<blockquote>The president was one of a number of voices that was supportive of the idea that this was the right decision. Obviously, I have respect for the office and the advice that he gave I paid attention to.</blockquote>Trump and Manfred met in April to discuss Rose's candidacy after the president promised to pardon Rose in a March 2025 Truth Social post. Trump wrote that Rose &quot;was a FAR BETTER PLAYER than most of those who made it&quot; and criticized MLB for lacking &quot;courage or decency.&quot;<h2>Rose's Gambling Legacy</h2>Rose died in September 2024 at age 83 from cardiovascular disease, never seeing his Hall of Fame dreams realized. He had been banned from baseball since 1989 for gambling on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds.The hits king admitted in 2004 to betting on baseball after years of denials, though investigators found he only wagered on his team to win, never against them. Rose predicted 10 days before his death that he wouldn't make the Hall of Fame until after he died, if at all.Trump's March social media post defended Rose's gambling, arguing he &quot;only bet on HIS TEAM WINNING&quot; and &quot;never betted against himself, or the other team.&quot; The president noted Rose held records for most hits in baseball history and won more games than anyone in sports history.With Rose now eligible for Hall of Fame consideration and Trump's continued pressure, baseball writers and veterans committees will decide whether &quot;Charlie Hustle&quot; finally gets his Cooperstown plaque posthumously.

President Donald Trump doubled down Friday on his support for Pete Rose's Baseball Hall of Fame induction, calling the all-time hits leader's decades-long exclusion a "disservice" during remarks to reporters at the White House.

"I think Pete Rose should have been in the Baseball Hall of Fame a long time ago," Trump said. "I think baseball did a great disservice by not respecting his achievements on the field."

MLB Removes Rose From Ineligible List

MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred removed Rose and several other players from the ineligible list in May 2025, opening the door for Hall of Fame consideration. Manfred acknowledged Trump's advocacy played a role in the decision.

The president was one of a number of voices that was supportive of the idea that this was the right decision. Obviously, I have respect for the office and the advice that he gave I paid attention to.

Trump and Manfred met in April to discuss Rose's candidacy after the president promised to pardon Rose in a March 2025 Truth Social post. Trump wrote that Rose "was a FAR BETTER PLAYER than most of those who made it" and criticized MLB for lacking "courage or decency."

Rose's Gambling Legacy

Rose died in September 2024 at age 83 from cardiovascular disease, never seeing his Hall of Fame dreams realized. He had been banned from baseball since 1989 for gambling on games while managing the Cincinnati Reds.

The hits king admitted in 2004 to betting on baseball after years of denials, though investigators found he only wagered on his team to win, never against them. Rose predicted 10 days before his death that he wouldn't make the Hall of Fame until after he died, if at all.

Trump's March social media post defended Rose's gambling, arguing he "only bet on HIS TEAM WINNING" and "never betted against himself, or the other team." The president noted Rose held records for most hits in baseball history and won more games than anyone in sports history.

With Rose now eligible for Hall of Fame consideration and Trump's continued pressure, baseball writers and veterans committees will decide whether "Charlie Hustle" finally gets his Cooperstown plaque posthumously.

President Trump calls Pete Rose's Hall of Fame exclusion a 'disservice' after MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred removed Rose from ineligible list in May 2025.

Trump Pushes MLB to Honor Pete Rose After Commissioner Lifts Ban

A European Union trade official branded President Trump's threat to impose 25% tariffs on EU trucks and cars as &quot;unacceptable&quot; after Trump accused the bloc of failing to comply with existing trade agreements.Trump announced he would tear up the current EU tariff deal and raise import duties on European vehicles, escalating trade tensions with America's largest trading partner. The move targets two of Europe's biggest export industries — automotive and commercial trucking.<h2>Trump Cites EU Non-Compliance</h2>The president justified the tariff threat by claiming the European Union has failed to meet its obligations under current trade arrangements. Trump has long criticized the EU's trade practices, arguing they disadvantage American manufacturers and workers.The 25% levy would represent a sharp increase from current rates and could significantly impact European automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen, which export vehicles to the US market. Commercial truck manufacturers would face similar penalties under the proposed tariff structure.For American consumers, the tariffs would likely translate into higher prices for European cars and trucks. The automotive industry employs millions of Americans in manufacturing, sales, and service sectors, making trade policy in this sector particularly significant for the US economy.<h2>EU Pushes Back</h2>The EU's rejection of Trump's tariff threat signals potential retaliation measures could follow. European officials have historically responded to US trade actions with counter-tariffs on American goods, creating tit-for-tat escalations that can harm both economies.This dispute comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-sets-25-tariff-on-eu-cars-exempts-european-automakers-building-in-us">Trump previously set tariffs on EU vehicles</a> while exempting European automakers that build cars in the United States. The latest threat suggests a broader approach that could impact all EU automotive imports regardless of where they're manufactured.European automakers have invested billions in US manufacturing facilities partly to avoid tariff exposure. The new threat could undermine that strategy and force companies to reconsider their American operations and pricing structures.The White House declined to provide details about ongoing diplomatic conversations when asked about the EU response, suggesting negotiations may be happening behind the scenes to resolve the trade dispute before tariffs take effect.

A European Union trade official branded President Trump's threat to impose 25% tariffs on EU trucks and cars as "unacceptable" after Trump accused the bloc of failing to comply with existing trade agreements.

Trump announced he would tear up the current EU tariff deal and raise import duties on European vehicles, escalating trade tensions with America's largest trading partner. The move targets two of Europe's biggest export industries — automotive and commercial trucking.

Trump Cites EU Non-Compliance

The president justified the tariff threat by claiming the European Union has failed to meet its obligations under current trade arrangements. Trump has long criticized the EU's trade practices, arguing they disadvantage American manufacturers and workers.

The 25% levy would represent a sharp increase from current rates and could significantly impact European automakers like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen, which export vehicles to the US market. Commercial truck manufacturers would face similar penalties under the proposed tariff structure.

For American consumers, the tariffs would likely translate into higher prices for European cars and trucks. The automotive industry employs millions of Americans in manufacturing, sales, and service sectors, making trade policy in this sector particularly significant for the US economy.

EU Pushes Back

The EU's rejection of Trump's tariff threat signals potential retaliation measures could follow. European officials have historically responded to US trade actions with counter-tariffs on American goods, creating tit-for-tat escalations that can harm both economies.

This dispute comes as Trump previously set tariffs on EU vehicles while exempting European automakers that build cars in the United States. The latest threat suggests a broader approach that could impact all EU automotive imports regardless of where they're manufactured.

European automakers have invested billions in US manufacturing facilities partly to avoid tariff exposure. The new threat could undermine that strategy and force companies to reconsider their American operations and pricing structures.

The White House declined to provide details about ongoing diplomatic conversations when asked about the EU response, suggesting negotiations may be happening behind the scenes to resolve the trade dispute before tariffs take effect.

European Union trade official rejects Trump's threat of 25% tariffs on EU trucks and cars after president accuses bloc of trade non-compliance.

EU Official Calls Trump's 25% Car Tariff Threat 'Unacceptable'

The Treasury Department will begin issuing the first refunds of President Trump's struck-down tariffs as early as May 11, returning money from the $166 billion in duties the government now owes to American importers.U.S. Court of International Trade Judge Richard Eaton announced the timeline Tuesday, saying Customs and Border Protection has approved roughly 21% of refund requests submitted through the government's new portal. Of those approved applications, 3% have reached the refund stage and will receive Treasury payments starting next week.<h2>Portal Crashes Under Business Demand</h2>The federal government launched the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) portal on April 20 to handle refund requests for Trump's International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs, which the Supreme Court invalidated in February. The system immediately crashed when thousands of businesses flooded the site seeking their money back.Small business owners across the country are fighting through technical glitches to reclaim tens of thousands in tariff payments. Beth Benike, co-founder of Minnesota-based Busy Baby, still cannot access the portal to apply for refunds. Dahlia Rizk, who owns Massachusetts kids' outerwear company Buckle Me Baby, struggled for weeks to submit her request for $66,000 in refunds.<blockquote>It was very difficult. I had a lot of trouble. I shouldn't have had to call up Border Patrol and explain my entire life story.</blockquote>Rizk eventually succeeded in submitting her application, which Customs approved. She expects to receive her refund within months. But her experience highlights the administrative burden facing thousands of importers trying to navigate the refund system.<h2>Legal Victory Creates Cash Flow Challenge</h2>The refunds stem from the Supreme Court's February ruling that struck down Trump's <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-sets-25-tariff-on-eu-cars-exempts-european-automakers-building-in-us">tariff policies</a> under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The decision, dubbed &quot;liberation day&quot; by importers, created an immediate obligation for the Treasury to return billions in collected duties.Judge Eaton acknowledged the system's growing pains but praised the government's speed in creating the refund mechanism. Legal experts noted the complexity of processing refund requests that span multiple years and thousands of import transactions.The $166 billion represents a massive cash outflow for the Treasury at a time when the government faces budget pressures from military operations and domestic spending. For businesses, the refunds provide crucial working capital that many have been without since paying the original tariffs.The May 11 launch date gives importers their first concrete timeline for recovering funds. With only a fraction of requests processed so far, most businesses face months of waiting before seeing their money returned to company bank accounts.

The Treasury Department will begin issuing the first refunds of President Trump's struck-down tariffs as early as May 11, returning money from the $166 billion in duties the government now owes to American importers.

U.S. Court of International Trade Judge Richard Eaton announced the timeline Tuesday, saying Customs and Border Protection has approved roughly 21% of refund requests submitted through the government's new portal. Of those approved applications, 3% have reached the refund stage and will receive Treasury payments starting next week.

Portal Crashes Under Business Demand

The federal government launched the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) portal on April 20 to handle refund requests for Trump's International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariffs, which the Supreme Court invalidated in February. The system immediately crashed when thousands of businesses flooded the site seeking their money back.

Small business owners across the country are fighting through technical glitches to reclaim tens of thousands in tariff payments. Beth Benike, co-founder of Minnesota-based Busy Baby, still cannot access the portal to apply for refunds. Dahlia Rizk, who owns Massachusetts kids' outerwear company Buckle Me Baby, struggled for weeks to submit her request for $66,000 in refunds.

It was very difficult. I had a lot of trouble. I shouldn't have had to call up Border Patrol and explain my entire life story.

Rizk eventually succeeded in submitting her application, which Customs approved. She expects to receive her refund within months. But her experience highlights the administrative burden facing thousands of importers trying to navigate the refund system.

Legal Victory Creates Cash Flow Challenge

The refunds stem from the Supreme Court's February ruling that struck down Trump's tariff policies under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The decision, dubbed "liberation day" by importers, created an immediate obligation for the Treasury to return billions in collected duties.

Judge Eaton acknowledged the system's growing pains but praised the government's speed in creating the refund mechanism. Legal experts noted the complexity of processing refund requests that span multiple years and thousands of import transactions.

The $166 billion represents a massive cash outflow for the Treasury at a time when the government faces budget pressures from military operations and domestic spending. For businesses, the refunds provide crucial working capital that many have been without since paying the original tariffs.

The May 11 launch date gives importers their first concrete timeline for recovering funds. With only a fraction of requests processed so far, most businesses face months of waiting before seeing their money returned to company bank accounts.

First IEEPA tariff refunds launch May 11 after Supreme Court struck down Trump's duties. Treasury owes $166 billion to importers through new CAPE portal system.

Trump Tariff Refunds Begin May 11 — Treasury Owes Businesses $166 Billion

President Trump announced he will impose 25% tariffs on European Union trucks and cars while exempting European automakers that produce vehicles inside the United States. The policy creates a clear incentive for foreign manufacturers to build American plants and hire American workers.The tariff structure rewards companies like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen that already operate manufacturing facilities on U.S. soil. BMW produces SUVs at its South Carolina plant, while Mercedes-Benz builds vehicles in Alabama and Volkswagen operates in Tennessee. These companies would avoid the steep import duties under Trump's plan.European automakers without significant U.S. production capacity face a stark choice: pay the 25% penalty or invest billions in American manufacturing. The tariff rate matches levels Trump previously threatened during trade negotiations, signaling he intends to follow through on campaign promises to protect domestic industry.The announcement comes as Trump reshapes America's trade relationships with key allies. After <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-removes-scotch-whisky-tariffs-after-king-charles-visit">removing tariffs on Scotch whisky</a> following productive talks with British leadership, the president now targets the EU's automotive exports to America.Meanwhile, the White House declined to provide details about Iran's latest diplomatic proposal to the United States, citing the need to protect private diplomatic communications. The Iranian overture comes as Trump maintains economic pressure on Tehran while seeking to avoid military escalation.The automotive tariff policy reflects Trump's broader economic strategy of using trade leverage to encourage domestic manufacturing. American consumers may face higher prices on European luxury vehicles, but the administration argues the policy will create manufacturing jobs and reduce America's trade deficit.European officials have not yet responded to Trump's tariff announcement, but the EU has previously threatened retaliatory measures against American exports when faced with similar trade restrictions. The automotive sector represents one of Europe's most significant export industries to the United States.Trump's exemption for European companies with U.S. operations could accelerate foreign investment in American manufacturing. The policy gives clear advantage to automakers willing to build plants, hire workers, and establish supply chains in the United States rather than shipping finished vehicles across the Atlantic.The 25% rate represents a substantial barrier to European automotive imports and matches tariff levels that have historically reshaped global trade flows. American automakers stand to benefit from reduced competition, while European manufacturers face pressure to expand their U.S. footprint or accept reduced market access.Industry analysts will watch whether other European automakers follow recent trends toward American manufacturing or attempt to absorb the tariff costs. The policy's implementation timeline and specific details remain unclear as the administration prepares to formalize the trade measures.

President Trump announced he will impose 25% tariffs on European Union trucks and cars while exempting European automakers that produce vehicles inside the United States. The policy creates a clear incentive for foreign manufacturers to build American plants and hire American workers.

The tariff structure rewards companies like BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and Volkswagen that already operate manufacturing facilities on U.S. soil. BMW produces SUVs at its South Carolina plant, while Mercedes-Benz builds vehicles in Alabama and Volkswagen operates in Tennessee. These companies would avoid the steep import duties under Trump's plan.

European automakers without significant U.S. production capacity face a stark choice: pay the 25% penalty or invest billions in American manufacturing. The tariff rate matches levels Trump previously threatened during trade negotiations, signaling he intends to follow through on campaign promises to protect domestic industry.

The announcement comes as Trump reshapes America's trade relationships with key allies. After removing tariffs on Scotch whisky following productive talks with British leadership, the president now targets the EU's automotive exports to America.

Meanwhile, the White House declined to provide details about Iran's latest diplomatic proposal to the United States, citing the need to protect private diplomatic communications. The Iranian overture comes as Trump maintains economic pressure on Tehran while seeking to avoid military escalation.

The automotive tariff policy reflects Trump's broader economic strategy of using trade leverage to encourage domestic manufacturing. American consumers may face higher prices on European luxury vehicles, but the administration argues the policy will create manufacturing jobs and reduce America's trade deficit.

European officials have not yet responded to Trump's tariff announcement, but the EU has previously threatened retaliatory measures against American exports when faced with similar trade restrictions. The automotive sector represents one of Europe's most significant export industries to the United States.

Trump's exemption for European companies with U.S. operations could accelerate foreign investment in American manufacturing. The policy gives clear advantage to automakers willing to build plants, hire workers, and establish supply chains in the United States rather than shipping finished vehicles across the Atlantic.

The 25% rate represents a substantial barrier to European automotive imports and matches tariff levels that have historically reshaped global trade flows. American automakers stand to benefit from reduced competition, while European manufacturers face pressure to expand their U.S. footprint or accept reduced market access.

Industry analysts will watch whether other European automakers follow recent trends toward American manufacturing or attempt to absorb the tariff costs. The policy's implementation timeline and specific details remain unclear as the administration prepares to formalize the trade measures.

President Trump announces 25% tariffs on European Union trucks and cars but will exempt European automakers that produce vehicles in the United States.

Trump Sets 25% Tariff on EU Cars, Exempts European Automakers Building in US

President Trump hit the 60-day War Powers Act deadline Friday for U.S. military operations in Iran while signing legislation to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security. The milestone triggers fresh congressional scrutiny over the conflict's duration and scope.The War Powers Act requires presidents to withdraw forces or seek congressional authorization within 60 days of notifying lawmakers about military action. Trump officially informed Congress of the Iran operations two months ago, setting up Friday's constitutional deadline. Democrats and several Republicans have expressed growing concerns about the conflict extending beyond the statutory time limit.The DHS funding bill provides financial support for most department operations, though specifics about excluded programs remain unclear. The legislation comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/house-ends-75-day-dhs-shutdown-ice-border-patrol-split-off">Congress recently ended a 75-day DHS shutdown</a> that had paralyzed key immigration enforcement functions.Congressional leadership faces mounting pressure to address the Iran situation through formal authorization votes or funding restrictions. Some lawmakers argue Trump exceeded his constitutional authority by continuing operations without explicit legislative approval. Others maintain the president retains sufficient executive power to protect American interests in the Persian Gulf region.The dual developments underscore the complex interplay between executive war powers and congressional oversight. Trump's Iran policy has divided Republicans, with some backing his aggressive stance while others question the legal framework for extended military engagement without clear legislative backing.Defense officials have defended the operations as necessary to protect American personnel and interests in the region. The administration points to ongoing threats from Iranian proxies and the need to maintain strategic pressure on Tehran's leadership. Critics counter that prolonged military action requires democratic debate and formal congressional consent.The DHS funding approval provides some stability for homeland security operations, though questions remain about future appropriations and departmental restructuring. Immigration enforcement agencies have operated under continuing resolutions and temporary measures for months, hampering long-term planning and resource allocation.Watch for congressional votes on Iran war authorization in coming days as lawmakers grapple with constitutional questions about military engagement duration. House and Senate leadership must decide whether to force confrontation with Trump over war powers or allow continued operations under executive authority.

President Trump hit the 60-day War Powers Act deadline Friday for U.S. military operations in Iran while signing legislation to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security. The milestone triggers fresh congressional scrutiny over the conflict's duration and scope.

The War Powers Act requires presidents to withdraw forces or seek congressional authorization within 60 days of notifying lawmakers about military action. Trump officially informed Congress of the Iran operations two months ago, setting up Friday's constitutional deadline. Democrats and several Republicans have expressed growing concerns about the conflict extending beyond the statutory time limit.

The DHS funding bill provides financial support for most department operations, though specifics about excluded programs remain unclear. The legislation comes as Congress recently ended a 75-day DHS shutdown that had paralyzed key immigration enforcement functions.

Congressional leadership faces mounting pressure to address the Iran situation through formal authorization votes or funding restrictions. Some lawmakers argue Trump exceeded his constitutional authority by continuing operations without explicit legislative approval. Others maintain the president retains sufficient executive power to protect American interests in the Persian Gulf region.

The dual developments underscore the complex interplay between executive war powers and congressional oversight. Trump's Iran policy has divided Republicans, with some backing his aggressive stance while others question the legal framework for extended military engagement without clear legislative backing.

Defense officials have defended the operations as necessary to protect American personnel and interests in the region. The administration points to ongoing threats from Iranian proxies and the need to maintain strategic pressure on Tehran's leadership. Critics counter that prolonged military action requires democratic debate and formal congressional consent.

The DHS funding approval provides some stability for homeland security operations, though questions remain about future appropriations and departmental restructuring. Immigration enforcement agencies have operated under continuing resolutions and temporary measures for months, hampering long-term planning and resource allocation.

Watch for congressional votes on Iran war authorization in coming days as lawmakers grapple with constitutional questions about military engagement duration. House and Senate leadership must decide whether to force confrontation with Trump over war powers or allow continued operations under executive authority.

President Trump reaches the 60-day War Powers Act threshold for Iran operations while signing legislation to fund most of the Department of Homeland Security.

War Powers Clock Hits 60 Days as Trump Signs DHS Funding Bill

Cole Allen left behind a treasure trove of evidence after allegedly trying to assassinate President Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, while Thomas Crooks took his secrets to the grave in the 2024 Butler, Pennsylvania attack. The stark contrast reveals why Americans still know so little about Crooks' motives nearly two years later.Allen, a 31-year-old California computer scientist, opened fire at the correspondents' dinner on Saturday, April 25, after rushing a Secret Service checkpoint with multiple weapons. Within days, investigators pieced together his apparent grievances, communications, and planning details. He now faces federal charges with more expected.Crooks presented a different challenge entirely. The 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, was shot dead at the scene during his 2024 assassination attempt at Trump's Butler rally. That single fact — his immediate death — limited investigators' ability to uncover his mindset and planning.&quot;There really just isn't always an answer. There isn't always a clear motive,&quot; Nicole Parker, former FBI special agent and author of &quot;The Two FBIs,&quot; told Fox News Digital. Parker said investigators sometimes work with minimal evidence, especially when suspects maintain few connections or leave limited digital footprints.The evidence gap between the two cases highlights a fundamental truth about assassination investigations. Allen survived his attack and allegedly shot a Secret Service officer &quot;point-blank&quot; according to the Secret Service director. His survival meant interrogations, seized devices, and traceable communications — all unavailable in the Crooks case.Parker defended the FBI's handling of the Crooks investigation, stating she doesn't believe agents are hiding information. &quot;There's probably just not as much evidence in that case to point investigators in a clear direction,&quot; she explained. The assessment contradicts conspiracy theories that have flourished around the Butler shooting.The Allen case demonstrates how quickly modern investigations can develop when suspects leave digital breadcrumbs. Authorities traced his alleged cross-country planning and identified his breaking points within days. Such rapid progress stands in sharp contrast to the lingering questions about Crooks' transformation from registered Republican to would-be assassin.The timing difference also matters for transparency. Allen's case unfolds in real-time with active legal proceedings, creating pressure for regular updates. The Crooks investigation concluded with his death, leaving few mechanisms for ongoing disclosure beyond periodic FBI reports.For Americans seeking answers about threats against their elected officials, the cases reveal both the power and limits of federal investigations. When suspects survive and leave evidence trails, the public gets clearer pictures of motives and methods. When they don't, as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/surveillance-photos-show-secret-service-firing-five-shots-at-trump-assassin">surveillance photos show</a> happened with Crooks, some questions may never find satisfactory answers.The Allen prosecution will test whether surviving assassination attempts leads to meaningful accountability and deterrence — outcomes impossible to achieve when suspects die at the scene like Crooks did.

Cole Allen left behind a treasure trove of evidence after allegedly trying to assassinate President Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, while Thomas Crooks took his secrets to the grave in the 2024 Butler, Pennsylvania attack. The stark contrast reveals why Americans still know so little about Crooks' motives nearly two years later.

Allen, a 31-year-old California computer scientist, opened fire at the correspondents' dinner on Saturday, April 25, after rushing a Secret Service checkpoint with multiple weapons. Within days, investigators pieced together his apparent grievances, communications, and planning details. He now faces federal charges with more expected.

Crooks presented a different challenge entirely. The 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, was shot dead at the scene during his 2024 assassination attempt at Trump's Butler rally. That single fact — his immediate death — limited investigators' ability to uncover his mindset and planning.

"There really just isn't always an answer. There isn't always a clear motive," Nicole Parker, former FBI special agent and author of "The Two FBIs," told Fox News Digital. Parker said investigators sometimes work with minimal evidence, especially when suspects maintain few connections or leave limited digital footprints.

The evidence gap between the two cases highlights a fundamental truth about assassination investigations. Allen survived his attack and allegedly shot a Secret Service officer "point-blank" according to the Secret Service director. His survival meant interrogations, seized devices, and traceable communications — all unavailable in the Crooks case.

Parker defended the FBI's handling of the Crooks investigation, stating she doesn't believe agents are hiding information. "There's probably just not as much evidence in that case to point investigators in a clear direction," she explained. The assessment contradicts conspiracy theories that have flourished around the Butler shooting.

The Allen case demonstrates how quickly modern investigations can develop when suspects leave digital breadcrumbs. Authorities traced his alleged cross-country planning and identified his breaking points within days. Such rapid progress stands in sharp contrast to the lingering questions about Crooks' transformation from registered Republican to would-be assassin.

The timing difference also matters for transparency. Allen's case unfolds in real-time with active legal proceedings, creating pressure for regular updates. The Crooks investigation concluded with his death, leaving few mechanisms for ongoing disclosure beyond periodic FBI reports.

For Americans seeking answers about threats against their elected officials, the cases reveal both the power and limits of federal investigations. When suspects survive and leave evidence trails, the public gets clearer pictures of motives and methods. When they don't, as surveillance photos show happened with Crooks, some questions may never find satisfactory answers.

The Allen prosecution will test whether surviving assassination attempts leads to meaningful accountability and deterrence — outcomes impossible to achieve when suspects die at the scene like Crooks did.

Experts say assassination suspect Cole Allen left more evidence than Thomas Crooks, explaining why details about the 2024 Trump shooter remain scarce nearly two

Cole Allen Left Evidence Trail That Thomas Crooks Took to His Grave

Experts say assassination suspect Cole Allen left more evidence than Thomas Crooks, explaining why details about the 2024 Trump shooter remain scarce nearly two years later.

President Donald Trump vowed to maintain naval blockade pressure on Iran while receiving briefings from military commanders on additional options, highlighting the tenuous nature of the current ceasefire between the two nations.The commitment to sustained naval pressure comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/irans-power-structure-fractures-as-trump-maintains-economic-blockade">Iran's power structure fractures</a> under existing blockade measures. Trump's stance signals that despite the cessation of active hostilities, the administration views economic and naval pressure as essential tools for securing long-term compliance from Tehran.Military commanders presented Trump with a range of escalatory options during the briefing, though specific details of the proposed actions remain classified. The meeting underscores the administration's preparedness to respond swiftly if Iran violates ceasefire terms or threatens American interests in the region.The naval blockade has proven effective at constraining Iran's oil exports and disrupting supply chains critical to the regime's military capabilities. Intelligence reports suggest the economic pressure has created internal tensions within Iran's leadership, potentially weakening hardline factions that oppose diplomatic resolution.Trump's declaration comes amid ongoing congressional scrutiny over war powers authorization, with several Republican senators previously breaking ranks to demand greater oversight of military operations. The administration has argued that maintaining defensive postures and economic pressure falls within presidential authorities without requiring additional congressional approval.For American taxpayers, the naval operations represent a significant ongoing expense, with deployment costs running into hundreds of millions monthly. However, Pentagon officials argue the blockade prevents more costly military confrontations while protecting vital shipping lanes that carry 20% of global oil supplies.The fragile ceasefire has held for several weeks, but intelligence assessments warn that Iran continues developing proxy capabilities throughout the region. Military planners view sustained pressure as necessary to prevent Tehran from using the lull to rebuild offensive capabilities or strengthen regional partnerships with China and Russia.Watch for Iran's response to Trump's blockade commitment and whether Tehran will seek to test American resolve through proxy actions or direct provocations in international waters.

President Donald Trump vowed to maintain naval blockade pressure on Iran while receiving briefings from military commanders on additional options, highlighting the tenuous nature of the current ceasefire between the two nations.

The commitment to sustained naval pressure comes as Iran's power structure fractures under existing blockade measures. Trump's stance signals that despite the cessation of active hostilities, the administration views economic and naval pressure as essential tools for securing long-term compliance from Tehran.

Military commanders presented Trump with a range of escalatory options during the briefing, though specific details of the proposed actions remain classified. The meeting underscores the administration's preparedness to respond swiftly if Iran violates ceasefire terms or threatens American interests in the region.

The naval blockade has proven effective at constraining Iran's oil exports and disrupting supply chains critical to the regime's military capabilities. Intelligence reports suggest the economic pressure has created internal tensions within Iran's leadership, potentially weakening hardline factions that oppose diplomatic resolution.

Trump's declaration comes amid ongoing congressional scrutiny over war powers authorization, with several Republican senators previously breaking ranks to demand greater oversight of military operations. The administration has argued that maintaining defensive postures and economic pressure falls within presidential authorities without requiring additional congressional approval.

For American taxpayers, the naval operations represent a significant ongoing expense, with deployment costs running into hundreds of millions monthly. However, Pentagon officials argue the blockade prevents more costly military confrontations while protecting vital shipping lanes that carry 20% of global oil supplies.

The fragile ceasefire has held for several weeks, but intelligence assessments warn that Iran continues developing proxy capabilities throughout the region. Military planners view sustained pressure as necessary to prevent Tehran from using the lull to rebuild offensive capabilities or strengthen regional partnerships with China and Russia.

Watch for Iran's response to Trump's blockade commitment and whether Tehran will seek to test American resolve through proxy actions or direct provocations in international waters.

President Trump pledged to maintain naval blockade pressure on Iran while military commanders briefed him on additional options amid fragile ceasefire.

Trump Vows Naval Blockade Will Continue as Iran Commanders Brief Military Options

Police arrested Tatsuya Suzuki Thursday evening for allegedly incinerating his wife's body in the animal waste cremator at Japan's popular Asahiyama Zoo, where he worked as an employee.Suzuki confessed to burning 33-year-old Yui Suzuki's remains &quot;for a few hours&quot; in the zoo's incinerator, which normally disposes of dead animals and waste at the Hokkaido facility. Police discovered human remains after scouring the cremator based on his statements during voluntary questioning.The suspect also made statements suggesting he killed his wife, according to the Japan Times. Police may file murder charges after completing their investigation. Yui Suzuki had previously told relatives her husband threatened to &quot;burn you until no trace of you will be left,&quot; public broadcaster NHK reported, citing investigative sources.Suzuki's relatives reported losing contact with Yui in late March. The couple lived alone together before her disappearance and death.The gruesome discovery forced Asahiyama Zoo to delay its Wednesday reopening after regular maintenance. The facility, one of Japan's most popular tourist attractions known for unique animal exhibits and structures, finally resumed operations Friday with officials bowing to visitors in apology.&quot;The zoo is in an extremely difficult situation at the moment,&quot; said Hirosuke Imazu, mayor of Asahikawa City, which operates the facility. &quot;But we would like to turn your support into our energy, and convey the beautiful lives of our animals.&quot;The case highlights Japan's ongoing struggles with domestic violence, where threats often escalate to deadly outcomes. Police charged Suzuki with transporting and destroying a body through incineeration at the tourist facility, with more serious charges likely pending the investigation's completion.

Police arrested Tatsuya Suzuki Thursday evening for allegedly incinerating his wife's body in the animal waste cremator at Japan's popular Asahiyama Zoo, where he worked as an employee.

Suzuki confessed to burning 33-year-old Yui Suzuki's remains "for a few hours" in the zoo's incinerator, which normally disposes of dead animals and waste at the Hokkaido facility. Police discovered human remains after scouring the cremator based on his statements during voluntary questioning.

The suspect also made statements suggesting he killed his wife, according to the Japan Times. Police may file murder charges after completing their investigation. Yui Suzuki had previously told relatives her husband threatened to "burn you until no trace of you will be left," public broadcaster NHK reported, citing investigative sources.

Suzuki's relatives reported losing contact with Yui in late March. The couple lived alone together before her disappearance and death.

The gruesome discovery forced Asahiyama Zoo to delay its Wednesday reopening after regular maintenance. The facility, one of Japan's most popular tourist attractions known for unique animal exhibits and structures, finally resumed operations Friday with officials bowing to visitors in apology.

"The zoo is in an extremely difficult situation at the moment," said Hirosuke Imazu, mayor of Asahikawa City, which operates the facility. "But we would like to turn your support into our energy, and convey the beautiful lives of our animals."

The case highlights Japan's ongoing struggles with domestic violence, where threats often escalate to deadly outcomes. Police charged Suzuki with transporting and destroying a body through incineeration at the tourist facility, with more serious charges likely pending the investigation's completion.

Tatsuya Suzuki confessed to burning his wife Yui's body for hours in Asahiyama Zoo's incinerator, forcing Japan's popular tourist destination to delay reopening

Zoo Worker Arrested for Incinerating Wife's Body in Animal Cremator

Tatsuya Suzuki confessed to burning his wife Yui's body for hours in Asahiyama Zoo's incinerator, forcing Japan's popular tourist destination to delay reopening.

The FBI reassigned 9,161 employees to immigration enforcement during President Trump's first nine months back in office, multiplying its immigration workforce by 23 times, according to bureau records obtained by The Intercept through a Freedom of Information Act request.The massive personnel shift meant one in five FBI special agents — 2,840 out of 13,700 — were pulled from criminal investigations to assist ICE with deportation operations by September. The bureau had only 279 workers on immigration matters when Trump took office in January 2025.&quot;That is a huge, huge number of people,&quot; said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council who has testified before Congress on deportation costs. &quot;This is just a somewhat shocking scale that we're looking at.&quot;The redeployment occurred under FBI Director Kash Patel, who has demonstrated unwavering loyalty to Trump's directives. David J. Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, warned the resource shift undermines the FBI's core mission.&quot;We're talking about the FBI diverting people away from criminal investigations and ongoing criminal activity and into civil immigration enforcement,&quot; Bier said. &quot;This is showing the extent to which the resources of the FBI were put at the disposal of Immigration and Customs Enforcement contrary to the intent of Congress.&quot;The documents don't clarify whether all 9,161 reassigned workers came from the FBI's 13,700 special agents or included support staff from the bureau's total workforce of 38,000 employees. The FBI declined to respond to questions about the rapid expansion or provide details on which divisions lost personnel.The scale of the reassignment raises questions about America's ability to investigate terrorism, organized crime, and cyber threats while the bureau focuses on civil immigration violations. Congress funds the FBI to conduct criminal investigations, not to serve as an auxiliary force for deportation operations.ICE also refused to comment on the unprecedented use of FBI resources for immigration enforcement. The arrangement appears to represent the largest peacetime redeployment of federal law enforcement personnel in modern history.The personnel shift will likely face scrutiny when Congress reviews the FBI's budget and oversight responsibilities in coming months.

The FBI reassigned 9,161 employees to immigration enforcement during President Trump's first nine months back in office, multiplying its immigration workforce by 23 times, according to bureau records obtained by The Intercept through a Freedom of Information Act request.

The massive personnel shift meant one in five FBI special agents — 2,840 out of 13,700 — were pulled from criminal investigations to assist ICE with deportation operations by September. The bureau had only 279 workers on immigration matters when Trump took office in January 2025.

"That is a huge, huge number of people," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council who has testified before Congress on deportation costs. "This is just a somewhat shocking scale that we're looking at."

The redeployment occurred under FBI Director Kash Patel, who has demonstrated unwavering loyalty to Trump's directives. David J. Bier, director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, warned the resource shift undermines the FBI's core mission.

"We're talking about the FBI diverting people away from criminal investigations and ongoing criminal activity and into civil immigration enforcement," Bier said. "This is showing the extent to which the resources of the FBI were put at the disposal of Immigration and Customs Enforcement contrary to the intent of Congress."

The documents don't clarify whether all 9,161 reassigned workers came from the FBI's 13,700 special agents or included support staff from the bureau's total workforce of 38,000 employees. The FBI declined to respond to questions about the rapid expansion or provide details on which divisions lost personnel.

The scale of the reassignment raises questions about America's ability to investigate terrorism, organized crime, and cyber threats while the bureau focuses on civil immigration violations. Congress funds the FBI to conduct criminal investigations, not to serve as an auxiliary force for deportation operations.

ICE also refused to comment on the unprecedented use of FBI resources for immigration enforcement. The arrangement appears to represent the largest peacetime redeployment of federal law enforcement personnel in modern history.

The personnel shift will likely face scrutiny when Congress reviews the FBI's budget and oversight responsibilities in coming months.

The FBI redirected over 9,000 personnel to immigration enforcement in Trump's first nine months, raising concerns about national security priorities.