InsiderWire Staff

Secretary of State Marco Rubio flew to Rome this week for emergency diplomatic talks after an unexpected spat between President Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni fractured what was once Trump's strongest alliance in Europe.The diplomatic crisis erupted suddenly between Trump and Meloni, who had previously maintained one of the warmest relationships among European leaders. The rift comes as Rubio continues his broader European tour, which included <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/rubio-visits-pope-leo-xiv-amid-trump-vatican-diplomatic-crisis">Vatican meetings</a> to address Trump's ongoing tensions with Pope Leo XIV.<h2>Italy Alliance at Risk</h2>Meloni's Italy represents a critical European partner for Trump's transactional foreign policy approach. The country hosts key NATO assets and serves as a gateway to Mediterranean operations. Italy also provides 12,000 troops to NATO missions and maintains strategic ports that American forces rely on for Middle East deployments.The timing creates additional pressure for American interests in Europe. With Spain already facing potential NATO expulsion over burden-sharing disputes, Trump cannot afford to lose another major European ally. Italy's cooperation becomes even more vital as the administration seeks European support for its Iran policy and energy security initiatives.<h2>Rubio's Damage Control Mission</h2>Rubio's Rome visit signals the White House recognizes the stakes. The Secretary of State has emerged as Trump's primary diplomatic firefighter, recently managing Vatican relations and briefing on Iran crisis developments. His Italy mission suggests the Meloni relationship deteriorated quickly enough to require immediate intervention.The diplomatic rupture also complicates Trump's broader European strategy. Meloni had provided crucial backing for American positions on China, immigration, and energy independence. Her government offered one of the few reliable votes in European Council meetings where other leaders increasingly challenge American priorities.Italian cooperation proves especially important for American taxpayers as the administration seeks burden-sharing improvements. Italy contributes $25 billion annually to NATO operations and hosts American military installations that would cost significantly more to relocate.Rubio's success in Rome will determine whether Trump can salvage this key relationship or faces further isolation among traditional allies. The outcome affects everything from Mediterranean security operations to European support for America's China containment strategy.This is a developing story and will be updated.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio flew to Rome this week for emergency diplomatic talks after an unexpected spat between President Trump and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni fractured what was once Trump's strongest alliance in Europe.

The diplomatic crisis erupted suddenly between Trump and Meloni, who had previously maintained one of the warmest relationships among European leaders. The rift comes as Rubio continues his broader European tour, which included Vatican meetings to address Trump's ongoing tensions with Pope Leo XIV.

Italy Alliance at Risk

Meloni's Italy represents a critical European partner for Trump's transactional foreign policy approach. The country hosts key NATO assets and serves as a gateway to Mediterranean operations. Italy also provides 12,000 troops to NATO missions and maintains strategic ports that American forces rely on for Middle East deployments.

The timing creates additional pressure for American interests in Europe. With Spain already facing potential NATO expulsion over burden-sharing disputes, Trump cannot afford to lose another major European ally. Italy's cooperation becomes even more vital as the administration seeks European support for its Iran policy and energy security initiatives.

Rubio's Damage Control Mission

Rubio's Rome visit signals the White House recognizes the stakes. The Secretary of State has emerged as Trump's primary diplomatic firefighter, recently managing Vatican relations and briefing on Iran crisis developments. His Italy mission suggests the Meloni relationship deteriorated quickly enough to require immediate intervention.

The diplomatic rupture also complicates Trump's broader European strategy. Meloni had provided crucial backing for American positions on China, immigration, and energy independence. Her government offered one of the few reliable votes in European Council meetings where other leaders increasingly challenge American priorities.

Italian cooperation proves especially important for American taxpayers as the administration seeks burden-sharing improvements. Italy contributes $25 billion annually to NATO operations and hosts American military installations that would cost significantly more to relocate.

Rubio's success in Rome will determine whether Trump can salvage this key relationship or faces further isolation among traditional allies. The outcome affects everything from Mediterranean security operations to European support for America's China containment strategy.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio flew to Rome this week for emergency talks after President Trump's unexpected diplomatic clash with Italian PM Giorgia Meloni.

Rubio Rushes to Rome After Trump-Meloni Spat Fractures Key Alliance

US and Iranian forces traded fire near the Strait of Hormuz on day 70 of their conflict, with both sides accusing the other of violating their fragile ceasefire in the world's most critical oil shipping lane.US Central Command said American forces intercepted &quot;unprovoked Iranian attacks&quot; and responded with &quot;self-defence strikes,&quot; while Tehran accused Washington of targeting two ships near the strait and hitting civilian areas along Iran's southern coast. Iranian state media reported explosions on Qeshm Island and said air defense systems intercepted multiple drones over the strategic location.<h2>Strategic Island Under Fire</h2>The fighting centered on Qeshm Island, which sits at the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz and serves as Iran's primary platform for &quot;asymmetric&quot; naval operations against US forces. The island's position allows Iran to threaten shipping through the waterway that carries one-fifth of global oil supplies.The exchange comes just one day after President Donald Trump suggested a deal with Tehran could be within reach, following what he called &quot;very good talks.&quot; But Trump also delivered a warning, threatening the US could resume bombing if Iran refused to agree to terms, as Insider Wire <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-fires-on-iranian-tanker-as-trump-threatens-renewed-bombing-campaign">previously reported</a>.The timing exposes the fragility of ceasefire negotiations that have been <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/iran-us-eye-30-day-peace-deal-as-saudi-arabia-brokers-talks">brokered by Saudi Arabia</a> in recent weeks. American taxpayers have watched gas prices climb to $4.50 per gallon as the conflict disrupts global energy markets, putting pressure on the White House to find a diplomatic solution.<h2>Escalation Threatens Oil Markets</h2>Any sustained fighting near the Strait of Hormuz poses direct risks to American economic interests. The narrow waterway handles roughly 21% of global petroleum liquids transit, and Iranian threats to close it have historically sent oil prices soaring.For American forces in the region, the latest exchange underscores the challenges of maintaining freedom of navigation while avoiding full-scale war. CENTCOM has positioned significant naval assets in the Gulf to keep shipping lanes open, but each engagement risks escalation that could draw in thousands more US troops.Trump's diplomatic approach has focused on transactional deals rather than comprehensive agreements, seeking to end the conflict quickly while preserving American deterrence. The president's warning about resumed bombing signals his administration won't accept Iranian provocations indefinitely.Watch for whether this latest exchange derails the Saudi-brokered talks or pushes both sides toward the 30-day peace deal framework that negotiators have been discussing. The next 48 hours will show whether diplomatic momentum can survive combat in the Gulf.This is a developing story and will be updated.

US and Iranian forces traded fire near the Strait of Hormuz on day 70 of their conflict, with both sides accusing the other of violating their fragile ceasefire in the world's most critical oil shipping lane.

US Central Command said American forces intercepted "unprovoked Iranian attacks" and responded with "self-defence strikes," while Tehran accused Washington of targeting two ships near the strait and hitting civilian areas along Iran's southern coast. Iranian state media reported explosions on Qeshm Island and said air defense systems intercepted multiple drones over the strategic location.

Strategic Island Under Fire

The fighting centered on Qeshm Island, which sits at the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz and serves as Iran's primary platform for "asymmetric" naval operations against US forces. The island's position allows Iran to threaten shipping through the waterway that carries one-fifth of global oil supplies.

The exchange comes just one day after President Donald Trump suggested a deal with Tehran could be within reach, following what he called "very good talks." But Trump also delivered a warning, threatening the US could resume bombing if Iran refused to agree to terms, as Insider Wire previously reported.

The timing exposes the fragility of ceasefire negotiations that have been brokered by Saudi Arabia in recent weeks. American taxpayers have watched gas prices climb to $4.50 per gallon as the conflict disrupts global energy markets, putting pressure on the White House to find a diplomatic solution.

Escalation Threatens Oil Markets

Any sustained fighting near the Strait of Hormuz poses direct risks to American economic interests. The narrow waterway handles roughly 21% of global petroleum liquids transit, and Iranian threats to close it have historically sent oil prices soaring.

For American forces in the region, the latest exchange underscores the challenges of maintaining freedom of navigation while avoiding full-scale war. CENTCOM has positioned significant naval assets in the Gulf to keep shipping lanes open, but each engagement risks escalation that could draw in thousands more US troops.

Trump's diplomatic approach has focused on transactional deals rather than comprehensive agreements, seeking to end the conflict quickly while preserving American deterrence. The president's warning about resumed bombing signals his administration won't accept Iranian provocations indefinitely.

Watch for whether this latest exchange derails the Saudi-brokered talks or pushes both sides toward the 30-day peace deal framework that negotiators have been discussing. The next 48 hours will show whether diplomatic momentum can survive combat in the Gulf.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

US CENTCOM reports intercepting Iranian attacks near Strait of Hormuz while Iran accuses America of targeting ships and civilian areas on Qeshm Island.

US, Iran Exchange Fire at Hormuz on Day 70 — Both Sides Claim Ceasefire Breach

Chinese military analysts view America as a &quot;giant with a limp&quot; after months of <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-fires-on-iranian-tanker-as-trump-threatens-renewed-bombing-campaign">sustained combat operations against Iran</a> have drained U.S. weapons stockpiles and weakened deterrence in the Taiwan Strait.Beijing's assessment creates new leverage for Chinese President Xi Jinping heading into his upcoming summit with President Trump, according to Chinese foreign policy experts. The weapons depletion gives China a window of opportunity should it choose to move against Taiwan while America rebuilds its arsenal.<h2>Weapons Shortage Creates Strategic Opening</h2>The extended Iran conflict has forced the Pentagon to expend critical munitions including precision-guided missiles, anti-ship weapons, and air defense systems. Chinese strategists believe this depletion reduces America's ability to respond effectively to a Taiwan crisis while maintaining Middle East operations.Defense analysts in Beijing calculate that restocking depleted weapons systems will take 12-18 months at current production rates. This timeline coincides with China's military modernization schedule and gives the People's Liberation Army a potential advantage in any cross-strait scenario.The Chinese assessment extends beyond weapons to include sailor and pilot fatigue, maintenance backlogs on naval vessels, and the strain of maintaining dual-theater readiness. American forces have been operating at high tempo since <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-navy-strikes-iranian-sites-after-unprovoked-attack-on-three-destroyers">Iranian attacks on U.S. Navy destroyers</a> escalated the conflict.<h2>Summit Implications</h2>China's perception of American weakness reshapes the dynamics of Trump's planned meeting with Xi. Rather than negotiating from a position of military strength, the U.S. faces questions about its commitment and capacity to defend Taiwan while engaged in the Middle East.Chinese officials have already signaled they view the Iran war as proof of American strategic overextension. Beijing's state media has highlighted U.S. weapons shortages and questioned whether America can maintain its Pacific commitments.The timing benefits China's broader strategy of testing American resolve across multiple fronts. While the U.S. focuses resources on Iran, China has increased military flights near Taiwan and expanded naval patrols in disputed waters.American taxpayers are funding a two-front challenge that stretches military resources thin. The Iran engagement costs billions monthly while China's military buildup continues unabated. Each missile fired in the Middle East is one less available for Pacific deterrence.Watch for China to push harder on Taiwan issues during the Trump-Xi summit, calculating that America's Iran commitments limit realistic military responses to Chinese aggression in the South China Sea.

Chinese military analysts view America as a "giant with a limp" after months of sustained combat operations against Iran have drained U.S. weapons stockpiles and weakened deterrence in the Taiwan Strait.

Beijing's assessment creates new leverage for Chinese President Xi Jinping heading into his upcoming summit with President Trump, according to Chinese foreign policy experts. The weapons depletion gives China a window of opportunity should it choose to move against Taiwan while America rebuilds its arsenal.

Weapons Shortage Creates Strategic Opening

The extended Iran conflict has forced the Pentagon to expend critical munitions including precision-guided missiles, anti-ship weapons, and air defense systems. Chinese strategists believe this depletion reduces America's ability to respond effectively to a Taiwan crisis while maintaining Middle East operations.

Defense analysts in Beijing calculate that restocking depleted weapons systems will take 12-18 months at current production rates. This timeline coincides with China's military modernization schedule and gives the People's Liberation Army a potential advantage in any cross-strait scenario.

The Chinese assessment extends beyond weapons to include sailor and pilot fatigue, maintenance backlogs on naval vessels, and the strain of maintaining dual-theater readiness. American forces have been operating at high tempo since Iranian attacks on U.S. Navy destroyers escalated the conflict.

Summit Implications

China's perception of American weakness reshapes the dynamics of Trump's planned meeting with Xi. Rather than negotiating from a position of military strength, the U.S. faces questions about its commitment and capacity to defend Taiwan while engaged in the Middle East.

Chinese officials have already signaled they view the Iran war as proof of American strategic overextension. Beijing's state media has highlighted U.S. weapons shortages and questioned whether America can maintain its Pacific commitments.

The timing benefits China's broader strategy of testing American resolve across multiple fronts. While the U.S. focuses resources on Iran, China has increased military flights near Taiwan and expanded naval patrols in disputed waters.

American taxpayers are funding a two-front challenge that stretches military resources thin. The Iran engagement costs billions monthly while China's military buildup continues unabated. Each missile fired in the Middle East is one less available for Pacific deterrence.

Watch for China to push harder on Taiwan issues during the Trump-Xi summit, calculating that America's Iran commitments limit realistic military responses to Chinese aggression in the South China Sea.

Chinese analysts say America's Iran conflict has weakened U.S. deterrence against Taiwan invasion, giving Beijing leverage ahead of Trump summit talks.

China Views U.S. as 'Giant With a Limp' as Iran War Drains Weapons

The U.S. Court of International Trade struck down President Trump's global 10% tariffs Thursday in a 2-1 decision, dealing another legal blow to the administration's trade agenda and forcing taxpayer-funded refunds to businesses.The ruling comes after 24 states and a small group of businesses filed suit in March challenging the tariffs Trump imposed in February under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Those levies replaced his previous &quot;Liberation Day&quot; tariffs after the Supreme Court struck them down 6-3 in February for exceeding presidential authority.<h2>Court Calls Tariffs 'Unlawful'</h2>In its 53-page ruling, the three-judge panel declared the Section 122 tariffs &quot;unlawful&quot; and noted they caused &quot;economic harm&quot; to American businesses. The court found Trump lacked authority to impose the duties because Section 122 requires an actual balance-of-payments deficit — money flowing out of America faster than flowing in.Instead, the White House proclamation focused on narrower economic measures: the trade deficit and current account deficit. Two Obama-appointed judges joined the majority opinion, while a George W. Bush appointee dissented.The court ordered immediate tariff relief for Washington state and two businesses that sued, plus refunds with interest for all duties they paid. However, the panel stopped short of a universal injunction that would end the tariffs nationwide — meaning other states and businesses still face the 10% levy unless they file separate lawsuits.<h2>Trump Doubles Down Despite Legal Setbacks</h2>Asked about the ruling Thursday night, Trump dismissed the decision and attacked the majority judges as &quot;radical left.&quot; He signaled no retreat from his tariff strategy despite mounting legal obstacles.The White House now faces a complex legal maze. Trump's team hoped to replace the temporary Section 122 tariffs with longer-lasting duties under different legal authority, but that requires completing trade investigations into foreign countries' practices first. The administration must also begin issuing refunds this month to businesses that paid the earlier IEEPA tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court.This marks the second major court defeat for Trump's trade agenda in three months. The pattern reveals how legal challenges are constraining presidential power over tariffs — authority Congress has steadily delegated to the executive branch since the 1930s but courts are now willing to police more aggressively.The administration will likely appeal Thursday's ruling while scrambling to find new legal justification for its protectionist agenda before the 150-day window for Section 122 tariffs expires.

The U.S. Court of International Trade struck down President Trump's global 10% tariffs Thursday in a 2-1 decision, dealing another legal blow to the administration's trade agenda and forcing taxpayer-funded refunds to businesses.

The ruling comes after 24 states and a small group of businesses filed suit in March challenging the tariffs Trump imposed in February under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974. Those levies replaced his previous "Liberation Day" tariffs after the Supreme Court struck them down 6-3 in February for exceeding presidential authority.

Court Calls Tariffs 'Unlawful'

In its 53-page ruling, the three-judge panel declared the Section 122 tariffs "unlawful" and noted they caused "economic harm" to American businesses. The court found Trump lacked authority to impose the duties because Section 122 requires an actual balance-of-payments deficit — money flowing out of America faster than flowing in.

Instead, the White House proclamation focused on narrower economic measures: the trade deficit and current account deficit. Two Obama-appointed judges joined the majority opinion, while a George W. Bush appointee dissented.

The court ordered immediate tariff relief for Washington state and two businesses that sued, plus refunds with interest for all duties they paid. However, the panel stopped short of a universal injunction that would end the tariffs nationwide — meaning other states and businesses still face the 10% levy unless they file separate lawsuits.

Trump Doubles Down Despite Legal Setbacks

Asked about the ruling Thursday night, Trump dismissed the decision and attacked the majority judges as "radical left." He signaled no retreat from his tariff strategy despite mounting legal obstacles.

The White House now faces a complex legal maze. Trump's team hoped to replace the temporary Section 122 tariffs with longer-lasting duties under different legal authority, but that requires completing trade investigations into foreign countries' practices first. The administration must also begin issuing refunds this month to businesses that paid the earlier IEEPA tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court.

This marks the second major court defeat for Trump's trade agenda in three months. The pattern reveals how legal challenges are constraining presidential power over tariffs — authority Congress has steadily delegated to the executive branch since the 1930s but courts are now willing to police more aggressively.

The administration will likely appeal Thursday's ruling while scrambling to find new legal justification for its protectionist agenda before the 150-day window for Section 122 tariffs expires.

U.S. Court of International Trade rules 2-1 that Trump's global 10% tariffs are unlawful, orders refunds for Washington state and businesses that sued.

Trade Court Strikes Down Trump's 10% Tariffs — White House Must Issue Refunds

US and Iranian forces exchanged fire Thursday in the Strait of Hormuz, marking the most serious test of their month-old ceasefire as both sides traded blame over who fired first.US Central Command said American forces intercepted &quot;unprovoked Iranian attacks&quot; on three destroyers, including the USS Mason, and responded with self-defense strikes. Iranian officials countered that US vessels attacked after America violated the ceasefire by targeting two Iranian ships and hitting civilian areas.<h2>Trump Dismisses Clashes as 'Love Tap'</h2>President Trump downplayed the incident in an ABC News interview, calling the US strikes &quot;just a love tap&quot; and insisting the ceasefire remained in effect. He later took to Truth Social to claim &quot;no damage done to the three Destroyers, but great damage done to the Iranian attackers.&quot;Trump described Iranian drones being shot down in characteristic fashion: &quot;They dropped ever so beautifully down to the Ocean, very much like a butterfly dropping to its grave!&quot; He capped his post with a warning to Tehran, vowing to &quot;knock them out a lot harder, and a lot more violently, in the future, if they don't get their Deal signed, FAST!&quot;<h2>War Profits Concern Energy Experts</h2>The continued Iran conflict has generated billions in windfall profits for oil companies, raising concerns about derailing America's energy transition. Lukas Shankar-Ross from Friends of the Earth warned that &quot;windfall profits from Trump's war will allow big oil to build a wall of money around its Trump-era political victories.&quot;Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Vatican officials in Rome as part of efforts to ease tensions after Trump's repeated criticisms of Pope Leo. The Vatican said it raised &quot;the need to work tirelessly in favour of peace&quot; during talks with Rubio, as Insider Wire <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/rubio-meets-vatican-secretary-of-state-on-middle-east-peace-religious-freedom">previously reported</a>.The Thursday clashes occurred just as Pakistani officials suggested the US and Iran were &quot;supposedly close to a peace deal,&quot; highlighting the fragile nature of diplomatic progress. The skirmishes threw into question the viability of the <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-iran-ceasefire-holds-despite-naval-clashes-in-hormuz-strait">shaky ceasefire</a> that had largely held for the previous month.The confrontation underscores the continued volatility in one of the world's most strategic waterways, where roughly 20% of global oil passes through daily. With Trump threatening escalated retaliation and Iran showing no signs of backing down, the incident tests whether diplomatic progress can survive military flashpoints.

US and Iranian forces exchanged fire Thursday in the Strait of Hormuz, marking the most serious test of their month-old ceasefire as both sides traded blame over who fired first.

US Central Command said American forces intercepted "unprovoked Iranian attacks" on three destroyers, including the USS Mason, and responded with self-defense strikes. Iranian officials countered that US vessels attacked after America violated the ceasefire by targeting two Iranian ships and hitting civilian areas.

Trump Dismisses Clashes as 'Love Tap'

President Trump downplayed the incident in an ABC News interview, calling the US strikes "just a love tap" and insisting the ceasefire remained in effect. He later took to Truth Social to claim "no damage done to the three Destroyers, but great damage done to the Iranian attackers."

Trump described Iranian drones being shot down in characteristic fashion: "They dropped ever so beautifully down to the Ocean, very much like a butterfly dropping to its grave!" He capped his post with a warning to Tehran, vowing to "knock them out a lot harder, and a lot more violently, in the future, if they don't get their Deal signed, FAST!"

War Profits Concern Energy Experts

The continued Iran conflict has generated billions in windfall profits for oil companies, raising concerns about derailing America's energy transition. Lukas Shankar-Ross from Friends of the Earth warned that "windfall profits from Trump's war will allow big oil to build a wall of money around its Trump-era political victories."

Meanwhile, Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Vatican officials in Rome as part of efforts to ease tensions after Trump's repeated criticisms of Pope Leo. The Vatican said it raised "the need to work tirelessly in favour of peace" during talks with Rubio, as Insider Wire previously reported.

The Thursday clashes occurred just as Pakistani officials suggested the US and Iran were "supposedly close to a peace deal," highlighting the fragile nature of diplomatic progress. The skirmishes threw into question the viability of the shaky ceasefire that had largely held for the previous month.

The confrontation underscores the continued volatility in one of the world's most strategic waterways, where roughly 20% of global oil passes through daily. With Trump threatening escalated retaliation and Iran showing no signs of backing down, the incident tests whether diplomatic progress can survive military flashpoints.

US and Iranian forces clashed Thursday in Strait of Hormuz, testing month-old ceasefire. Trump dismissed strikes as 'love tap,' threatened harder hits if deal n

US-Iran Forces Exchange Fire in Hormuz — Trump Calls Strikes 'Love Tap'

US and Iranian forces clashed Thursday in Strait of Hormuz, testing month-old ceasefire. Trump dismissed strikes as 'love tap,' threatened harder hits if deal not signed.

President Trump delivered a surprise video message Thursday night honoring his chief of staff Susie Wiles at the Independent Women's Forum gala, where she received the organization's Woman of Valor Award in a rare public appearance for the famously low-profile power player.Trump called Wiles &quot;the best White House chief of staff ever in history&quot; during the ceremony, which honored her as the first female to hold the position. The president also revealed Wiles has been battling cancer while managing the White House operation.<blockquote>Not only is Susie the first female chief of staff in American history, she's also one of the best White House chiefs of staff ever in history, I say the best, actually. I'm tremendously grateful for her friendship, loyalty, and support every single day.</blockquote><h2>Fighting Cancer While Running the White House</h2>Trump disclosed that Wiles has shown &quot;courage and toughness&quot; while winning her battle against cancer during her tenure as chief of staff. He said the early diagnosis means &quot;she's going to be in great shape&quot; and praised her for continuing to serve while undergoing treatment.The revelation adds context to <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-white-house-wont-pick-ai-winners-and-losers-wiles-vows-speed-over-control">Wiles' recent policy statements</a> about streamlining government operations, showing her commitment to the role despite personal health challenges.Wiles accepted the honor in a statement to Fox News Digital, saying she was &quot;deeply honored&quot; to receive the Barbara K. Olson Award, which recognizes women advancing economic liberty and political freedom. The award honors Olson, the Independent Women's Forum founder killed in the September 11 Pentagon attack.<h2>Key Campaign Architect Steps Into Spotlight</h2>The gala marked a rare public moment for Wiles, who built her reputation as a behind-the-scenes operator through decades of Republican politics. Trump credited her with playing a &quot;key role in every one of my campaigns for president&quot; and helping lead what he called &quot;perhaps the most consequential election victory in modern times&quot; in 2024.Wiles told Fox News the award reflects her team's &quot;shared mission&quot; to protect liberty and expand opportunity for American families. She emphasized the honor represents not just personal recognition but validation of the administration's broader goals.The chief of staff role traditionally operates behind closed doors, making Wiles' public recognition unusual for someone who typically avoids media attention while wielding substantial influence over White House operations and access to the president.Watch for how Wiles balances her recovery with managing Trump's ambitious second-term agenda, as the cancer revelation underscores the personal sacrifices made by senior administration officials serving at the highest levels of government.

President Trump delivered a surprise video message Thursday night honoring his chief of staff Susie Wiles at the Independent Women's Forum gala, where she received the organization's Woman of Valor Award in a rare public appearance for the famously low-profile power player.

Trump called Wiles "the best White House chief of staff ever in history" during the ceremony, which honored her as the first female to hold the position. The president also revealed Wiles has been battling cancer while managing the White House operation.

Not only is Susie the first female chief of staff in American history, she's also one of the best White House chiefs of staff ever in history, I say the best, actually. I'm tremendously grateful for her friendship, loyalty, and support every single day.

Fighting Cancer While Running the White House

Trump disclosed that Wiles has shown "courage and toughness" while winning her battle against cancer during her tenure as chief of staff. He said the early diagnosis means "she's going to be in great shape" and praised her for continuing to serve while undergoing treatment.

The revelation adds context to Wiles' recent policy statements about streamlining government operations, showing her commitment to the role despite personal health challenges.

Wiles accepted the honor in a statement to Fox News Digital, saying she was "deeply honored" to receive the Barbara K. Olson Award, which recognizes women advancing economic liberty and political freedom. The award honors Olson, the Independent Women's Forum founder killed in the September 11 Pentagon attack.

Key Campaign Architect Steps Into Spotlight

The gala marked a rare public moment for Wiles, who built her reputation as a behind-the-scenes operator through decades of Republican politics. Trump credited her with playing a "key role in every one of my campaigns for president" and helping lead what he called "perhaps the most consequential election victory in modern times" in 2024.

Wiles told Fox News the award reflects her team's "shared mission" to protect liberty and expand opportunity for American families. She emphasized the honor represents not just personal recognition but validation of the administration's broader goals.

The chief of staff role traditionally operates behind closed doors, making Wiles' public recognition unusual for someone who typically avoids media attention while wielding substantial influence over White House operations and access to the president.

Watch for how Wiles balances her recovery with managing Trump's ambitious second-term agenda, as the cancer revelation underscores the personal sacrifices made by senior administration officials serving at the highest levels of government.

President Trump surprised his chief of staff Susie Wiles with video tribute at Independent Women's Forum gala, praising her historic role and cancer battle.

Trump Hails Wiles as 'Best Chief of Staff Ever' at Rare Public Honor

American warships struck Iranian military facilities Thursday after Iranian forces launched an unprovoked attack on three U.S. Navy destroyers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions in the world's most critical oil chokepoint.Iran fired missiles, drones, and deployed small boats against the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers USS Truxtun, USS Rafael Peralta, and USS Mason as they moved toward the Gulf of Oman. U.S. Central Command confirmed no American vessels sustained damage in the assault.<h2>Swift Retaliation Targets Iranian Military Infrastructure</h2>The U.S. military responded by hitting Iranian missile and drone launch sites, command-and-control locations, and intelligence hubs. The strikes represent the latest direct military confrontation between American and Iranian forces in the strategic waterway that carries 21% of global petroleum exports.<blockquote>CENTCOM does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces.</blockquote>The Iranian attack marks a dangerous escalation in the region, coming as Trump has promised the conflict <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-iran-ceasefire-holds-despite-naval-clashes-in-hormuz-strait">will &quot;be over quickly&quot;</a> and amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to contain the crisis. The Strait of Hormuz remains the world's most important energy transit route, with disruptions capable of sending oil prices soaring and hitting American consumers at the pump.Thursday's exchange underscores Iran's willingness to directly target U.S. naval forces even as both sides have signaled interest in containing the broader conflict. The precision of the American response—targeting specific military installations rather than broader infrastructure—suggests the Pentagon aims to deter further Iranian aggression without triggering a wider war.The incident will test Trump's promise of swift resolution while putting American naval commanders on high alert for additional Iranian provocations in the confined waters of the Strait.This is a developing story and will be updated.

American warships struck Iranian military facilities Thursday after Iranian forces launched an unprovoked attack on three U.S. Navy destroyers transiting the Strait of Hormuz, escalating tensions in the world's most critical oil chokepoint.

Iran fired missiles, drones, and deployed small boats against the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers USS Truxtun, USS Rafael Peralta, and USS Mason as they moved toward the Gulf of Oman. U.S. Central Command confirmed no American vessels sustained damage in the assault.

Swift Retaliation Targets Iranian Military Infrastructure

The U.S. military responded by hitting Iranian missile and drone launch sites, command-and-control locations, and intelligence hubs. The strikes represent the latest direct military confrontation between American and Iranian forces in the strategic waterway that carries 21% of global petroleum exports.

CENTCOM does not seek escalation but remains positioned and ready to protect American forces.

The Iranian attack marks a dangerous escalation in the region, coming as Trump has promised the conflict will "be over quickly" and amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to contain the crisis. The Strait of Hormuz remains the world's most important energy transit route, with disruptions capable of sending oil prices soaring and hitting American consumers at the pump.

Thursday's exchange underscores Iran's willingness to directly target U.S. naval forces even as both sides have signaled interest in containing the broader conflict. The precision of the American response—targeting specific military installations rather than broader infrastructure—suggests the Pentagon aims to deter further Iranian aggression without triggering a wider war.

The incident will test Trump's promise of swift resolution while putting American naval commanders on high alert for additional Iranian provocations in the confined waters of the Strait.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

American forces hit Iranian missile and drone sites Thursday after Iran attacked USS Truxtun, USS Rafael Peralta, and USS Mason in Strait of Hormuz.

US Navy Strikes Iranian Sites After Unprovoked Attack on Three Destroyers

President Donald Trump declared that Iranians need guns to fight their government, sparking a revival of Reagan-era strategies for backing armed resistance movements against hostile regimes. Trump made the comments during an interview with &quot;The Hugh Hewitt Show&quot; while discussing anti-regime protests inside Iran.<blockquote>They have to have guns. And I think they're getting some guns. As soon as they have guns, they'll fight like, as good as anybody there is.</blockquote>The remarks come as Iran's regime emerges battered from weeks of military conflict with the U.S. and Israel, while domestic unrest continues to simmer after years of failed protests and violent crackdowns by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Iranian dissidents, military analysts, and Republican lawmakers now openly debate whether America should move beyond sanctions and actively arm resistance networks inside Iran.<h2>Military Experts Push 'Reagan Doctrine 2.0'</h2>Brett Velicovich, founder of Powerus and former U.S. military intelligence specialist, told Fox News the current moment represents the best opportunity in decades to challenge Tehran from within. He described the strategy as &quot;Reagan Doctrine 2.0&quot; — updated for modern asymmetric warfare using drones and decentralized tactics.<blockquote>Cheap FPV drones, loitering munitions, and small arms let motivated fighters turn Iran's streets and mountains into a nightmare for the IRGC.</blockquote>The Reagan Doctrine backed anti-Soviet resistance movements across the globe during the 1980s, from Afghanistan's mujahideen to Nicaragua's contras. Supporters argue sanctions, diplomacy, and unarmed demonstrations have failed to produce meaningful change in Iran after decades of trying.Senator Lindsey Graham has pushed for what he calls a &quot;Second Amendment solution&quot; for the Iranian people, urging the U.S. and Israel to arm Iranian civilians seeking to topple the regime, as Insider Wire <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-iran-ceasefire-holds-despite-naval-clashes-in-hormuz-strait">previously reported</a> during recent naval clashes.<h2>Critics Warn of Civil War Risk</h2>Critics warn that openly discussing armed resistance could endanger protesters already facing brutal crackdowns and risk pushing Iran toward civil war. They argue such strategies could deepen divisions within Iran's fractured opposition movement, which has struggled to unite around common leadership.The debate unfolds as the Iranian regime faces its weakest position in years. Recent airstrikes by the U.S. and Israel have damaged key infrastructure, while economic sanctions continue to squeeze Tehran's resources. Protesters have repeatedly taken to the streets despite violent suppression by security forces.Velicovich emphasized that modern technology makes armed resistance more viable than during the Cold War era. Small, commercially available drones and lightweight weapons systems could give Iranian fighters significant advantages against government forces in urban and mountainous terrain.The discussion marks a sharp departure from previous U.S. policy focused primarily on economic pressure and diplomatic isolation. Trump's comments signal potential willingness to escalate American involvement in Iranian internal affairs, raising questions about how far the administration might go in supporting armed opposition groups.

President Donald Trump declared that Iranians need guns to fight their government, sparking a revival of Reagan-era strategies for backing armed resistance movements against hostile regimes. Trump made the comments during an interview with "The Hugh Hewitt Show" while discussing anti-regime protests inside Iran.

They have to have guns. And I think they're getting some guns. As soon as they have guns, they'll fight like, as good as anybody there is.

The remarks come as Iran's regime emerges battered from weeks of military conflict with the U.S. and Israel, while domestic unrest continues to simmer after years of failed protests and violent crackdowns by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. Iranian dissidents, military analysts, and Republican lawmakers now openly debate whether America should move beyond sanctions and actively arm resistance networks inside Iran.

Military Experts Push 'Reagan Doctrine 2.0'

Brett Velicovich, founder of Powerus and former U.S. military intelligence specialist, told Fox News the current moment represents the best opportunity in decades to challenge Tehran from within. He described the strategy as "Reagan Doctrine 2.0" — updated for modern asymmetric warfare using drones and decentralized tactics.

Cheap FPV drones, loitering munitions, and small arms let motivated fighters turn Iran's streets and mountains into a nightmare for the IRGC.

The Reagan Doctrine backed anti-Soviet resistance movements across the globe during the 1980s, from Afghanistan's mujahideen to Nicaragua's contras. Supporters argue sanctions, diplomacy, and unarmed demonstrations have failed to produce meaningful change in Iran after decades of trying.

Senator Lindsey Graham has pushed for what he calls a "Second Amendment solution" for the Iranian people, urging the U.S. and Israel to arm Iranian civilians seeking to topple the regime, as Insider Wire previously reported during recent naval clashes.

Critics Warn of Civil War Risk

Critics warn that openly discussing armed resistance could endanger protesters already facing brutal crackdowns and risk pushing Iran toward civil war. They argue such strategies could deepen divisions within Iran's fractured opposition movement, which has struggled to unite around common leadership.

The debate unfolds as the Iranian regime faces its weakest position in years. Recent airstrikes by the U.S. and Israel have damaged key infrastructure, while economic sanctions continue to squeeze Tehran's resources. Protesters have repeatedly taken to the streets despite violent suppression by security forces.

Velicovich emphasized that modern technology makes armed resistance more viable than during the Cold War era. Small, commercially available drones and lightweight weapons systems could give Iranian fighters significant advantages against government forces in urban and mountainous terrain.

The discussion marks a sharp departure from previous U.S. policy focused primarily on economic pressure and diplomatic isolation. Trump's comments signal potential willingness to escalate American involvement in Iranian internal affairs, raising questions about how far the administration might go in supporting armed opposition groups.

President Trump's comments about arming Iranian protesters spark debate over supporting armed resistance networks against Tehran's weakened regime.

Trump Backs Armed Iranian Resistance — Dissidents Push Reagan Doctrine Revival

Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Mich.) introduced legislation Thursday that would force President Trump to end U.S. military operations against Iran by July 31 and impose strict limits on the scope of ongoing combat missions.Barrett, a 22-year Army veteran who deployed to Iraq and Kuwait, filed the bill as Congress grows increasingly restless over the expanding conflict. The measure would require the White House to present a detailed withdrawal timeline and restrict future military engagement without explicit congressional authorization.<h2>Congressional War Powers Challenge</h2>The legislation represents the most direct Republican challenge yet to Trump's Iran strategy, coming as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/us-iran-ceasefire-holds-despite-naval-clashes-in-hormuz-strait">ceasefire efforts</a> remain fragile and military tensions continue escalating in the Persian Gulf. Barrett's military background gives weight to his criticism — he understands the costs of prolonged Middle East deployments on American troops and taxpayers.The bill would strip funding for offensive operations after the July deadline while maintaining defensive capabilities to protect U.S. forces during withdrawal. It also demands quarterly reports to Congress on troop levels, casualties, and mission objectives — accountability measures the White House has resisted providing.Barrett's move signals growing bipartisan unease with open-ended military commitments. Even Republicans who initially supported tough Iran policies now question the financial burden and strategic wisdom of expanding operations without clear victory conditions.<h2>National Security Implications</h2>The timing puts Trump in a difficult position. With gas prices hitting $4.50 per gallon due to Persian Gulf disruptions and defense spending soaring, public support for the Iran campaign faces mounting pressure. Barrett's legislation forces a debate Trump hoped to avoid during his second term's early months.The bill faces uncertain prospects in the Republican-controlled House, where leadership has largely backed Trump's foreign policy decisions. However, Barrett's military credentials and growing concerns about mission creep could attract enough GOP support to complicate White House strategy.Watch for the White House response and whether other Republican veterans in Congress join Barrett's challenge to executive war powers.

Rep. Tom Barrett (R-Mich.) introduced legislation Thursday that would force President Trump to end U.S. military operations against Iran by July 31 and impose strict limits on the scope of ongoing combat missions.

Barrett, a 22-year Army veteran who deployed to Iraq and Kuwait, filed the bill as Congress grows increasingly restless over the expanding conflict. The measure would require the White House to present a detailed withdrawal timeline and restrict future military engagement without explicit congressional authorization.

Congressional War Powers Challenge

The legislation represents the most direct Republican challenge yet to Trump's Iran strategy, coming as ceasefire efforts remain fragile and military tensions continue escalating in the Persian Gulf. Barrett's military background gives weight to his criticism — he understands the costs of prolonged Middle East deployments on American troops and taxpayers.

The bill would strip funding for offensive operations after the July deadline while maintaining defensive capabilities to protect U.S. forces during withdrawal. It also demands quarterly reports to Congress on troop levels, casualties, and mission objectives — accountability measures the White House has resisted providing.

Barrett's move signals growing bipartisan unease with open-ended military commitments. Even Republicans who initially supported tough Iran policies now question the financial burden and strategic wisdom of expanding operations without clear victory conditions.

National Security Implications

The timing puts Trump in a difficult position. With gas prices hitting $4.50 per gallon due to Persian Gulf disruptions and defense spending soaring, public support for the Iran campaign faces mounting pressure. Barrett's legislation forces a debate Trump hoped to avoid during his second term's early months.

The bill faces uncertain prospects in the Republican-controlled House, where leadership has largely backed Trump's foreign policy decisions. However, Barrett's military credentials and growing concerns about mission creep could attract enough GOP support to complicate White House strategy.

Watch for the White House response and whether other Republican veterans in Congress join Barrett's challenge to executive war powers.

GOP Rep. Tom Barrett, a 22-year Army veteran, introduced legislation Thursday requiring Trump to wind down Iran military operations by July's end.

Army Veteran Barrett Introduces Bill to End Iran War by July

Secretary of State Marco Rubio spent two and a half hours at the Vatican Thursday in damage-control talks with Pope Leo XIV, as the Trump administration scrambles to repair relations after weeks of public feuding between the president and the American-born pontiff.Rubio met with Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin and other Holy See officials to discuss &quot;the strong relationship between the United States and the Holy See and their shared commitment to promoting peace and human dignity,&quot; according to the U.S. Embassy. The talks covered ongoing humanitarian efforts in the Western Hemisphere and Middle East peace initiatives.<h2>Trump-Pope Tensions Escalate</h2>The diplomatic mission comes after Trump accused Leo of being &quot;weak on crime&quot; in April following the pope's continued calls for nuclear disarmament. The president escalated his attacks May 4 on &quot;The Hugh Hewitt Show,&quot; claiming Leo sympathizes with Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.<blockquote>I think he's endangering a lot of Catholics and a lot of people.</blockquote>Leo fired back, defending his mission to &quot;proclaim the gospel, to preach peace.&quot; The pope challenged critics to attack him truthfully, noting the church has opposed all nuclear weapons for years. The rift first opened in October when Leo criticized &quot;inhumane&quot; migrant treatment, then deepened during Easter season as he condemned Trump's threats to &quot;eradicate Iranian civilization&quot; as &quot;truly unacceptable.&quot;Vatican observers see <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/rubio-heads-to-italy-seeking-vatican-european-reset">Rubio's diplomatic outreach</a> as an attempt to cool the rhetoric between two of the world's most influential American-born figures. Rev. Antonio Spadaro, undersecretary for the Vatican's Dicastery for Culture and Education, called the meeting an effort to &quot;return the confrontation to a quieter, more institutional register.&quot;<h2>Catholic Diplomat Takes Lead</h2>Rubio, a son of immigrants and the most prominent Catholic in Trump's cabinet after Vice President JD Vance, denied the meeting aimed to smooth relations during a Tuesday White House press conference. But the timing suggests otherwise, as Trump's inflammatory rhetoric has strained a relationship vital to U.S. influence among the world's 1.3 billion Catholics.The Vatican holds outsized diplomatic weight in peace negotiations and humanitarian crises. Leo's criticism of U.S. policies on migration, nuclear weapons, and Middle East conflicts threatens to undermine American soft power at a time when Trump faces mounting international challenges from Iran to European allies questioning his leadership.Vatican watchers will monitor whether Rubio's diplomatic intervention produces a public warming between Trump and Leo, or if the president's combative style continues to strain this centuries-old alliance.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio spent two and a half hours at the Vatican Thursday in damage-control talks with Pope Leo XIV, as the Trump administration scrambles to repair relations after weeks of public feuding between the president and the American-born pontiff.

Rubio met with Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin and other Holy See officials to discuss "the strong relationship between the United States and the Holy See and their shared commitment to promoting peace and human dignity," according to the U.S. Embassy. The talks covered ongoing humanitarian efforts in the Western Hemisphere and Middle East peace initiatives.

Trump-Pope Tensions Escalate

The diplomatic mission comes after Trump accused Leo of being "weak on crime" in April following the pope's continued calls for nuclear disarmament. The president escalated his attacks May 4 on "The Hugh Hewitt Show," claiming Leo sympathizes with Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.

I think he's endangering a lot of Catholics and a lot of people.

Leo fired back, defending his mission to "proclaim the gospel, to preach peace." The pope challenged critics to attack him truthfully, noting the church has opposed all nuclear weapons for years. The rift first opened in October when Leo criticized "inhumane" migrant treatment, then deepened during Easter season as he condemned Trump's threats to "eradicate Iranian civilization" as "truly unacceptable."

Vatican observers see Rubio's diplomatic outreach as an attempt to cool the rhetoric between two of the world's most influential American-born figures. Rev. Antonio Spadaro, undersecretary for the Vatican's Dicastery for Culture and Education, called the meeting an effort to "return the confrontation to a quieter, more institutional register."

Catholic Diplomat Takes Lead

Rubio, a son of immigrants and the most prominent Catholic in Trump's cabinet after Vice President JD Vance, denied the meeting aimed to smooth relations during a Tuesday White House press conference. But the timing suggests otherwise, as Trump's inflammatory rhetoric has strained a relationship vital to U.S. influence among the world's 1.3 billion Catholics.

The Vatican holds outsized diplomatic weight in peace negotiations and humanitarian crises. Leo's criticism of U.S. policies on migration, nuclear weapons, and Middle East conflicts threatens to undermine American soft power at a time when Trump faces mounting international challenges from Iran to European allies questioning his leadership.

Vatican watchers will monitor whether Rubio's diplomatic intervention produces a public warming between Trump and Leo, or if the president's combative style continues to strain this centuries-old alliance.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Pope Leo XIV for 2.5 hours Thursday, seeking to repair relations after Trump called the pontiff 'weak on crime.'