InsiderWire Staff

President Donald Trump declared Tuesday night that King Charles III agrees with him that Iran should never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, making the claim during a White House state dinner honoring the British monarch's visit to Washington.Trump's remarks at the formal dinner likely caught royal aides off guard, given the constitutional monarchy's strict tradition of political neutrality on international affairs. The British crown typically avoids public positions on contentious foreign policy issues, particularly those involving military action or sanctions.The president's comments come as his administration continues <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trumps-iran-campaign-stalls-two-months-of-strikes-fail-to-force-nuclear-deal">its pressure campaign against Iran's nuclear program</a>, which has included military strikes and diplomatic efforts to force Tehran into negotiations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently rejected Iranian peace overtures, insisting that nuclear disarmament must be the starting point for any talks.Royal protocol experts say Trump's characterization of the king's private views puts Buckingham Palace in an awkward position. The monarch serves as head of state for 15 Commonwealth realms and maintains carefully neutral public positions to preserve the institution's stability across different political administrations.King Charles has previously <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/king-charles-condemns-trump-assassination-attempt-in-congressional-address">addressed Congress during his visit</a>, focusing on shared democratic values rather than specific policy positions. His public statements have avoided taking sides on divisive international issues, including Iran sanctions and nuclear negotiations.The timing of Trump's remarks underscores the administration's efforts to build international consensus around its Iran strategy. Trump has <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-slams-german-chancellor-over-iran-doesnt-know-what-hes-talking-about">criticized European leaders</a> who have been reluctant to fully support military pressure on Tehran, making the claimed endorsement from Britain's head of state potentially valuable for diplomatic leverage.Iran has accelerated uranium enrichment activities in recent months, moving closer to weapons-grade levels despite international sanctions and targeted strikes on its nuclear facilities. Intelligence assessments suggest the regime could produce enough fissile material for a weapon within months if it chooses to break out of current agreements.Palace officials have not responded to requests for comment about Trump's characterization of the king's position. Royal sources typically decline to confirm or deny private conversations between the monarch and foreign leaders, maintaining the tradition of diplomatic discretion.The state dinner marked the highest-profile diplomatic engagement of King Charles's American visit, with congressional leaders and cabinet officials in attendance. Future meetings between the president and British officials will likely address whether the royal family's neutrality extends to private diplomatic conversations or public policy discussions.

President Donald Trump declared Tuesday night that King Charles III agrees with him that Iran should never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, making the claim during a White House state dinner honoring the British monarch's visit to Washington.

Trump's remarks at the formal dinner likely caught royal aides off guard, given the constitutional monarchy's strict tradition of political neutrality on international affairs. The British crown typically avoids public positions on contentious foreign policy issues, particularly those involving military action or sanctions.

The president's comments come as his administration continues its pressure campaign against Iran's nuclear program, which has included military strikes and diplomatic efforts to force Tehran into negotiations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently rejected Iranian peace overtures, insisting that nuclear disarmament must be the starting point for any talks.

Royal protocol experts say Trump's characterization of the king's private views puts Buckingham Palace in an awkward position. The monarch serves as head of state for 15 Commonwealth realms and maintains carefully neutral public positions to preserve the institution's stability across different political administrations.

King Charles has previously addressed Congress during his visit, focusing on shared democratic values rather than specific policy positions. His public statements have avoided taking sides on divisive international issues, including Iran sanctions and nuclear negotiations.

The timing of Trump's remarks underscores the administration's efforts to build international consensus around its Iran strategy. Trump has criticized European leaders who have been reluctant to fully support military pressure on Tehran, making the claimed endorsement from Britain's head of state potentially valuable for diplomatic leverage.

Iran has accelerated uranium enrichment activities in recent months, moving closer to weapons-grade levels despite international sanctions and targeted strikes on its nuclear facilities. Intelligence assessments suggest the regime could produce enough fissile material for a weapon within months if it chooses to break out of current agreements.

Palace officials have not responded to requests for comment about Trump's characterization of the king's position. Royal sources typically decline to confirm or deny private conversations between the monarch and foreign leaders, maintaining the tradition of diplomatic discretion.

The state dinner marked the highest-profile diplomatic engagement of King Charles's American visit, with congressional leaders and cabinet officials in attendance. Future meetings between the president and British officials will likely address whether the royal family's neutrality extends to private diplomatic conversations or public policy discussions.

President Trump told White House state dinner guests that King Charles agrees with him on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, sparking concern among

Trump Claims King Charles Agrees Iran Should Never Get Nuclear Weapons

President Trump told White House state dinner guests that King Charles agrees with him on preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, sparking concern among royal aides.

President Trump launched a sharp attack on German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Tuesday, declaring that Iran with nuclear weapons would hold &quot;the whole World hostage&quot; after the German leader criticized American strategy toward Tehran.Trump fired back on Truth Social, writing that &quot;the Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, thinks it's OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon&quot; and &quot;doesn't know what he's talking about!&quot; The president warned that allowing Iran to develop nuclear capabilities would create a global crisis requiring action &quot;other Nations, or Presidents, should have done long ago.&quot;The exchange began Monday when Merz addressed students at a school event in Marsberg, Germany, claiming Iran's leadership was &quot;humiliating&quot; the United States. He argued American officials were being sent to negotiations only to return &quot;empty-handed&quot; and questioned whether Washington had a &quot;clear&quot; path to resolve the conflict.&quot;An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards,&quot; Merz said, directly challenging Trump's diplomatic approach.Trump broadened his criticism beyond Iran policy, adding &quot;No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise!&quot; The remarks signal growing tensions between the traditional allies over Middle East strategy.The president's response follows his weekend decision to cancel a planned U.S. delegation trip to Islamabad, Pakistan, citing &quot;tremendous infighting and confusion within their 'leadership'&quot; and stating &quot;nobody knows who is in charge.&quot; Trump said Iran could call directly if it wanted negotiations rather than continuing failed indirect talks.Secretary of State Marco Rubio outlined the administration's concerns Monday, saying Iran's leadership is &quot;deeply fractured internally&quot; with competing factions limiting any potential agreement. Iranian officials often must &quot;negotiate with other Iranians&quot; before determining what they can offer, Rubio explained, while hardline elements with an &quot;apocalyptic vision&quot; ultimately control regime decision-making.Recent intelligence indicates authority in Iran has shifted heavily toward the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, creating no single decisive leadership structure directing negotiations. This fragmentation complicates Trump's efforts to secure meaningful concessions on Tehran's nuclear program, as Insider Wire <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trumps-iran-campaign-stalls-two-months-of-strikes-fail-to-force-nuclear-deal">previously reported</a>.The Trump administration has signaled a harder line toward Iran, rejecting proposals that would delay addressing Tehran's nuclear program and emphasizing any agreement must directly confront its weapons development capabilities. The clash with Germany reveals growing European skepticism about American strategy as diplomatic efforts stall.Watch for Trump to face additional criticism from European allies as his Iran campaign continues without clear progress toward nuclear negotiations.

President Trump launched a sharp attack on German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Tuesday, declaring that Iran with nuclear weapons would hold "the whole World hostage" after the German leader criticized American strategy toward Tehran.

Trump fired back on Truth Social, writing that "the Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, thinks it's OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about!" The president warned that allowing Iran to develop nuclear capabilities would create a global crisis requiring action "other Nations, or Presidents, should have done long ago."

The exchange began Monday when Merz addressed students at a school event in Marsberg, Germany, claiming Iran's leadership was "humiliating" the United States. He argued American officials were being sent to negotiations only to return "empty-handed" and questioned whether Washington had a "clear" path to resolve the conflict.

"An entire nation is being humiliated by the Iranian leadership, especially by these so-called Revolutionary Guards," Merz said, directly challenging Trump's diplomatic approach.

Trump broadened his criticism beyond Iran policy, adding "No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise!" The remarks signal growing tensions between the traditional allies over Middle East strategy.

The president's response follows his weekend decision to cancel a planned U.S. delegation trip to Islamabad, Pakistan, citing "tremendous infighting and confusion within their 'leadership'" and stating "nobody knows who is in charge." Trump said Iran could call directly if it wanted negotiations rather than continuing failed indirect talks.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio outlined the administration's concerns Monday, saying Iran's leadership is "deeply fractured internally" with competing factions limiting any potential agreement. Iranian officials often must "negotiate with other Iranians" before determining what they can offer, Rubio explained, while hardline elements with an "apocalyptic vision" ultimately control regime decision-making.

Recent intelligence indicates authority in Iran has shifted heavily toward the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, creating no single decisive leadership structure directing negotiations. This fragmentation complicates Trump's efforts to secure meaningful concessions on Tehran's nuclear program, as Insider Wire previously reported.

The Trump administration has signaled a harder line toward Iran, rejecting proposals that would delay addressing Tehran's nuclear program and emphasizing any agreement must directly confront its weapons development capabilities. The clash with Germany reveals growing European skepticism about American strategy as diplomatic efforts stall.

Watch for Trump to face additional criticism from European allies as his Iran campaign continues without clear progress toward nuclear negotiations.

President Trump blasted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Truth Social, warning Iran with nuclear weapons would hold 'the whole World hostage' after Merz crit

Trump Slams German Chancellor Over Iran: 'Doesn't Know What He's Talking About'

President Trump blasted German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Truth Social, warning Iran with nuclear weapons would hold 'the whole World hostage' after Merz criticized U.S. approach.

The International Football Association Board unanimously approved a new rule Tuesday that allows referees to issue red cards to players who cover their mouths while verbally confronting opponents. The measure takes effect at this summer's World Cup starting June 11.IFAB voted on the rule change during a meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia. FIFA proposed the amendment after Real Madrid's Vinícius Júnior accused Benfica's Gianluca Prestianni of making racially charged comments while covering his mouth during a February Champions League match in Lisbon.&quot;At the discretion of the competition organiser, any player covering their mouth in a confrontational situation with an opponent may be sanctioned with a red card,&quot; IFAB announced. UEFA already handed Prestianni a six-game ban for what it determined were homophobic insults. If Argentina selects him for their World Cup squad, the defending champions could lose him for their opening two matches.The rule targets a growing problem in international soccer where players shield their words from cameras and lip readers while engaging in verbal abuse. By covering their mouths, players previously made it nearly impossible for officials to determine what was said or gather evidence for disciplinary action.IFAB also approved a second rule change that penalizes players or team officials who leave the field in protest of referee decisions. Any player who walks off in disagreement with a call can now receive a red card, as can coaches or staff members who encourage players to abandon the match.The changes will apply to all 48 teams competing in the 2026 World Cup, hosted jointly by the United States, Canada and Mexico. American soccer fans attending matches can expect stricter enforcement of verbal conduct rules as FIFA attempts to crack down on discriminatory language that has plagued international competition.For U.S. players and coaches, the new rules mean adjusting tactics for handling controversial calls. The American squad will need to train players on proper conduct protocols to avoid costly ejections during the tournament on home soil.IFAB plans to communicate the rule changes to all World Cup participants before the tournament begins. Watch for how referees implement these standards during early matches, as their enforcement could significantly impact team strategies and player behavior throughout the competition.

The International Football Association Board unanimously approved a new rule Tuesday that allows referees to issue red cards to players who cover their mouths while verbally confronting opponents. The measure takes effect at this summer's World Cup starting June 11.

IFAB voted on the rule change during a meeting in Vancouver, British Columbia. FIFA proposed the amendment after Real Madrid's Vinícius Júnior accused Benfica's Gianluca Prestianni of making racially charged comments while covering his mouth during a February Champions League match in Lisbon.

"At the discretion of the competition organiser, any player covering their mouth in a confrontational situation with an opponent may be sanctioned with a red card," IFAB announced. UEFA already handed Prestianni a six-game ban for what it determined were homophobic insults. If Argentina selects him for their World Cup squad, the defending champions could lose him for their opening two matches.

The rule targets a growing problem in international soccer where players shield their words from cameras and lip readers while engaging in verbal abuse. By covering their mouths, players previously made it nearly impossible for officials to determine what was said or gather evidence for disciplinary action.

IFAB also approved a second rule change that penalizes players or team officials who leave the field in protest of referee decisions. Any player who walks off in disagreement with a call can now receive a red card, as can coaches or staff members who encourage players to abandon the match.

The changes will apply to all 48 teams competing in the 2026 World Cup, hosted jointly by the United States, Canada and Mexico. American soccer fans attending matches can expect stricter enforcement of verbal conduct rules as FIFA attempts to crack down on discriminatory language that has plagued international competition.

For U.S. players and coaches, the new rules mean adjusting tactics for handling controversial calls. The American squad will need to train players on proper conduct protocols to avoid costly ejections during the tournament on home soil.

IFAB plans to communicate the rule changes to all World Cup participants before the tournament begins. Watch for how referees implement these standards during early matches, as their enforcement could significantly impact team strategies and player behavior throughout the competition.

The International Football Association Board unanimously approved new rules targeting players who cover their mouths while confronting opponents, effective for 

FIFA Approves Red Card Rule for Players Who Cover Mouths During Confrontations

The International Football Association Board unanimously approved new rules targeting players who cover their mouths while confronting opponents, effective for this summer's World Cup.

China detained nearly 70 Panamanian-flagged ships in March after Panama's Supreme Court ruled against Chinese port operations at the Panama Canal, according to US Federal Maritime Commission data that shows detentions &quot;far exceeding historical norms.&quot;The detentions followed Panama's Supreme Court decision in late January to annul decades-old contracts that allowed CK Hutchison's subsidiary to operate the Balboa and Cristobal port terminals. The court deemed the agreements unconstitutional, stripping the Hong Kong-based company of control over the strategic waterway facilities.Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was &quot;deeply concerned&quot; by China's economic pressure campaign against Panama. &quot;We stand in solidarity with Panama. Any attempts to undermine Panama's sovereignty are a threat to us all,&quot; Rubio wrote on X Tuesday.Six Latin American countries joined the US in condemning what they called China's &quot;targeted economic pressure&quot; and &quot;blatant attempt to politicise maritime trade.&quot; Federal Maritime Commission head Laura DiBella warned the ship detentions carried direct consequences for American commerce.&quot;Given that Panama‑flagged ships carry a meaningful share of US containerised trade, these actions could result in significant commercial and strategic consequences to US shipping,&quot; DiBella said last month. She added that Beijing's &quot;intensified inspections were carried out under informal directives and appear intended to punish Panama.&quot;China's retaliation extends beyond Panama. US officials say Beijing summoned executives from shipping giants Maersk and Mediterranean Shipping Company for &quot;high-level discussions&quot; after their subsidiaries received 18-month contracts to replace CK Hutchison at the terminals. Chinese shipping company COSCO suspended operations at the Balboa terminal entirely.The dispute unfolds against President Trump's threats to &quot;take back&quot; control of the 49-mile Panama Canal. Trump alleged in his January inaugural address that China was &quot;operating&quot; the canal and made the waterway a focus of his second administration.China previously accused the US of &quot;bullying&quot; and attempting to damage Beijing's Latin American reputation, while calling Panama's Supreme Court ruling &quot;absurd&quot; and &quot;shameful.&quot; CK Hutchison is pursuing international arbitration against Panama's government over the contract cancellation.The standoff threatens a critical trade chokepoint that handles roughly 6% of global commerce. With Panama-flagged vessels carrying substantial US cargo and China escalating economic pressure, the dispute could disrupt supply chains and inflate shipping costs for American importers and exporters relying on the canal route.

China detained nearly 70 Panamanian-flagged ships in March after Panama's Supreme Court ruled against Chinese port operations at the Panama Canal, according to US Federal Maritime Commission data that shows detentions "far exceeding historical norms."

The detentions followed Panama's Supreme Court decision in late January to annul decades-old contracts that allowed CK Hutchison's subsidiary to operate the Balboa and Cristobal port terminals. The court deemed the agreements unconstitutional, stripping the Hong Kong-based company of control over the strategic waterway facilities.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Washington was "deeply concerned" by China's economic pressure campaign against Panama. "We stand in solidarity with Panama. Any attempts to undermine Panama's sovereignty are a threat to us all," Rubio wrote on X Tuesday.

Six Latin American countries joined the US in condemning what they called China's "targeted economic pressure" and "blatant attempt to politicise maritime trade." Federal Maritime Commission head Laura DiBella warned the ship detentions carried direct consequences for American commerce.

"Given that Panama‑flagged ships carry a meaningful share of US containerised trade, these actions could result in significant commercial and strategic consequences to US shipping," DiBella said last month. She added that Beijing's "intensified inspections were carried out under informal directives and appear intended to punish Panama."

China's retaliation extends beyond Panama. US officials say Beijing summoned executives from shipping giants Maersk and Mediterranean Shipping Company for "high-level discussions" after their subsidiaries received 18-month contracts to replace CK Hutchison at the terminals. Chinese shipping company COSCO suspended operations at the Balboa terminal entirely.

The dispute unfolds against President Trump's threats to "take back" control of the 49-mile Panama Canal. Trump alleged in his January inaugural address that China was "operating" the canal and made the waterway a focus of his second administration.

China previously accused the US of "bullying" and attempting to damage Beijing's Latin American reputation, while calling Panama's Supreme Court ruling "absurd" and "shameful." CK Hutchison is pursuing international arbitration against Panama's government over the contract cancellation.

The standoff threatens a critical trade chokepoint that handles roughly 6% of global commerce. With Panama-flagged vessels carrying substantial US cargo and China escalating economic pressure, the dispute could disrupt supply chains and inflate shipping costs for American importers and exporters relying on the canal route.

China detained nearly 70 Panamanian-flagged ships in March after Panama's Supreme Court annulled Chinese port contracts, threatening US trade routes.

China Detains 70 US-Flagged Ships After Panama Canal Court Ruling

Robert Anthony Morgan shot a woman in the neck during a Saturday night argument in Wildwood, Florida, then dragged her back inside the home before hiding in a backyard pool, police say. The 40-year-old convicted felon now faces attempted murder charges.Wildwood Police responded to reports of an argument followed by gunfire around 11:30 p.m. Saturday. Officers found the victim lying in a driveway with a gunshot wound to her neck. She was airlifted to a hospital with life-threatening injuries.The victim's mother witnessed Morgan drag the wounded woman back onto the property after the shooting. When she asked Morgan if he had called for help, he allegedly replied, &quot;She's fine,&quot; and threatened to shoot her if she contacted police, according to investigators.Morgan attempted to evade capture by crawling under a partially open garage door and jumping into a backyard pool. Officers pulled him from the water and arrested him without further incident. Authorities recovered a rifle from the garage floor and found blood in the street leading to the home.Four children were inside the residence during the shooting, adding another layer of trauma to what police described as the latest incident in a pattern of domestic violence between Morgan and the victim. The mother told investigators there was a documented history of abuse.Morgan faces charges of attempted felony murder, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and discharging a firearm in public or residential property. His prior conviction for felony battery made his gun possession illegal under federal law.The case highlights Florida's ongoing struggle with domestic violence and repeat offenders accessing firearms. Morgan made his initial court appearance Monday and is being held without bond as the victim fights for her life in the hospital.Prosecutors will likely seek enhanced penalties given Morgan's criminal history and the severity of the charges. The woman's condition and recovery will determine whether additional charges are filed.

Robert Anthony Morgan shot a woman in the neck during a Saturday night argument in Wildwood, Florida, then dragged her back inside the home before hiding in a backyard pool, police say. The 40-year-old convicted felon now faces attempted murder charges.

Wildwood Police responded to reports of an argument followed by gunfire around 11:30 p.m. Saturday. Officers found the victim lying in a driveway with a gunshot wound to her neck. She was airlifted to a hospital with life-threatening injuries.

The victim's mother witnessed Morgan drag the wounded woman back onto the property after the shooting. When she asked Morgan if he had called for help, he allegedly replied, "She's fine," and threatened to shoot her if she contacted police, according to investigators.

Morgan attempted to evade capture by crawling under a partially open garage door and jumping into a backyard pool. Officers pulled him from the water and arrested him without further incident. Authorities recovered a rifle from the garage floor and found blood in the street leading to the home.

Four children were inside the residence during the shooting, adding another layer of trauma to what police described as the latest incident in a pattern of domestic violence between Morgan and the victim. The mother told investigators there was a documented history of abuse.

Morgan faces charges of attempted felony murder, aggravated battery with a deadly weapon, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and discharging a firearm in public or residential property. His prior conviction for felony battery made his gun possession illegal under federal law.

The case highlights Florida's ongoing struggle with domestic violence and repeat offenders accessing firearms. Morgan made his initial court appearance Monday and is being held without bond as the victim fights for her life in the hospital.

Prosecutors will likely seek enhanced penalties given Morgan's criminal history and the severity of the charges. The woman's condition and recovery will determine whether additional charges are filed.

Robert Anthony Morgan, 40, faces attempted murder charges after shooting a woman in Wildwood, Florida, then hiding in a backyard pool before his arrest.

Florida Man Shot Woman in Neck, Hid in Pool Before SWAT Arrest

The world destroyed less forest in 2025 than in any year over the past decade, according to a new World Resources Institute report. The environmental milestone comes as climate-driven wildfires pose an escalating threat to the planet's remaining woodlands.The WRI findings mark a rare piece of positive environmental news for American taxpayers, who contribute billions annually to international climate initiatives and forest preservation programs. Reduced deforestation could help stabilize global carbon cycles and weather patterns that affect U.S. agriculture and coastal security.Despite the progress in curbing human forest destruction, the report warns that rising global temperatures are making wildfires more frequent and intense worldwide. These blazes now pose a growing risk to forests that survived the chainsaw, potentially undermining conservation gains through natural disasters beyond immediate human control.The data reflects a complex environmental reality where policy victories in forest protection face new challenges from climate systems already set in motion. For American interests, this presents both opportunity and risk — less intentional deforestation means more stable global ecosystems, but increasing wildfire activity could threaten U.S. timber imports and agricultural stability.The decline in deliberate forest clearing suggests international pressure and economic incentives may be working to preserve critical ecosystems. However, the wildfire trend points to longer-term climate impacts that could require different policy approaches and potentially more U.S. involvement in global fire management systems.The report underscores how environmental challenges increasingly operate on multiple fronts — human activity and natural systems now interact in ways that make simple conservation strategies insufficient. American policymakers will need to balance forest preservation investments with wildfire preparedness as both domestic and international priorities.Watch for upcoming international climate meetings where these findings will likely influence U.S. funding commitments and forest management partnerships with other nations.

The world destroyed less forest in 2025 than in any year over the past decade, according to a new World Resources Institute report. The environmental milestone comes as climate-driven wildfires pose an escalating threat to the planet's remaining woodlands.

The WRI findings mark a rare piece of positive environmental news for American taxpayers, who contribute billions annually to international climate initiatives and forest preservation programs. Reduced deforestation could help stabilize global carbon cycles and weather patterns that affect U.S. agriculture and coastal security.

Despite the progress in curbing human forest destruction, the report warns that rising global temperatures are making wildfires more frequent and intense worldwide. These blazes now pose a growing risk to forests that survived the chainsaw, potentially undermining conservation gains through natural disasters beyond immediate human control.

The data reflects a complex environmental reality where policy victories in forest protection face new challenges from climate systems already set in motion. For American interests, this presents both opportunity and risk — less intentional deforestation means more stable global ecosystems, but increasing wildfire activity could threaten U.S. timber imports and agricultural stability.

The decline in deliberate forest clearing suggests international pressure and economic incentives may be working to preserve critical ecosystems. However, the wildfire trend points to longer-term climate impacts that could require different policy approaches and potentially more U.S. involvement in global fire management systems.

The report underscores how environmental challenges increasingly operate on multiple fronts — human activity and natural systems now interact in ways that make simple conservation strategies insufficient. American policymakers will need to balance forest preservation investments with wildfire preparedness as both domestic and international priorities.

Watch for upcoming international climate meetings where these findings will likely influence U.S. funding commitments and forest management partnerships with other nations.

World Resources Institute reports 2025 saw lowest forest destruction in decade, but climate-driven wildfires increasingly threaten remaining woodlands.

Global Deforestation Hits Decade Low Despite Rising Wildfire Damage

King Charles III condemned Saturday's assassination attempt on President Donald Trump during a Congressional address Tuesday, declaring that &quot;such acts of violence will never succeed&quot; after a gunman opened fire at the Washington Hilton Hotel during the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner.The British monarch told lawmakers they were meeting &quot;in times of great uncertainty&quot; following the incident that targeted America's leadership. Charles referenced the shooter who &quot;sought to harm the leadership&quot; of the United States while the president and other Trump administration officials attended the annual media event.&quot;We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from this great building, that sought to harm the leadership of your nation, and to ferment wider fear and discord,&quot; the King said. &quot;Let me say with unshakable resolve, such acts of violence will never succeed.&quot;The Department of Justice charged Cole Tomas Allen, 31, with attempting to assassinate Trump after he allegedly charged through a magnetometer while armed in an attempt to breach the ballroom where the president was present. Federal prosecutors say Allen &quot;had a manifesto detailing his intention to target officials in the Trump administration,&quot; as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/fbi-reveals-cole-allen-called-trump-pedophile-rapist-and-traitor-in-manifesto">Insider Wire previously reported</a>.The King's remarks came as he addressed broader international challenges facing both nations. He spoke about ongoing conflicts &quot;from Europe to the Middle East, which pose immense challenges for the international community, and whose impact is felt in communities, the length and breadth of our own countries.&quot;The assassination attempt has raised fresh questions about presidential security protocols at high-profile events. Allen's ability to breach initial security measures before opening fire has prompted reviews of Secret Service procedures at venues hosting the president and senior officials.Congressional leaders praised the King's solidarity with America during the security crisis. The rare joint address by a British monarch came at a moment when the special relationship between the two nations faces tests from global instability and domestic political violence.The DOJ continues building its case against Allen as investigators examine his manifesto and potential connections to broader threats against the Trump administration.

King Charles III condemned Saturday's assassination attempt on President Donald Trump during a Congressional address Tuesday, declaring that "such acts of violence will never succeed" after a gunman opened fire at the Washington Hilton Hotel during the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner.

The British monarch told lawmakers they were meeting "in times of great uncertainty" following the incident that targeted America's leadership. Charles referenced the shooter who "sought to harm the leadership" of the United States while the president and other Trump administration officials attended the annual media event.

"We meet, too, in the aftermath of the incident not far from this great building, that sought to harm the leadership of your nation, and to ferment wider fear and discord," the King said. "Let me say with unshakable resolve, such acts of violence will never succeed."

The Department of Justice charged Cole Tomas Allen, 31, with attempting to assassinate Trump after he allegedly charged through a magnetometer while armed in an attempt to breach the ballroom where the president was present. Federal prosecutors say Allen "had a manifesto detailing his intention to target officials in the Trump administration," as Insider Wire previously reported.

The King's remarks came as he addressed broader international challenges facing both nations. He spoke about ongoing conflicts "from Europe to the Middle East, which pose immense challenges for the international community, and whose impact is felt in communities, the length and breadth of our own countries."

The assassination attempt has raised fresh questions about presidential security protocols at high-profile events. Allen's ability to breach initial security measures before opening fire has prompted reviews of Secret Service procedures at venues hosting the president and senior officials.

Congressional leaders praised the King's solidarity with America during the security crisis. The rare joint address by a British monarch came at a moment when the special relationship between the two nations faces tests from global instability and domestic political violence.

The DOJ continues building its case against Allen as investigators examine his manifesto and potential connections to broader threats against the Trump administration.

King Charles III addressed Congress Tuesday, condemning the Saturday assassination attempt on President Trump at the White House Correspondents' Dinner venue.

King Charles Condemns Trump Assassination Attempt in Congressional Address

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker launched a blistering attack on President Donald Trump Tuesday, calling him &quot;demented&quot; and &quot;guilty of inciting violence&quot; during an appearance on MSNBC's &quot;Deadline.&quot;Pritzker defended former FBI Director James Comey against his <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/doj-indicts-james-comey-again-over-86-47-seashell-post">second federal indictment</a> over a social media post featuring seashells arranged as &quot;86 47.&quot; The Illinois Democrat predicted the case will be &quot;thrown out,&quot; dismissing the evidence as &quot;seashells on a beach.&quot;&quot;Let's start with what Donald Trump is really after here: weaponizing the DOJ to go after his political enemies,&quot; Pritzker said. He noted that Comey himself pulled down the post &quot;because he thought it might be rude or improper,&quot; not because he considered it a threat against the president.Pritzker then turned the tables on Trump's rhetoric, citing specific examples of what he called presidential incitement. &quot;Remember, this is the president who threatened the death penalty for General Mark Milley, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,&quot; he said. &quot;This is the same guy who told crowds at his rallies that, oh, that protester, punch him, take him down.&quot;The governor also accused Trump of celebrating the death of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, calling Mueller &quot;a patriot.&quot; Pritzker characterized Trump as &quot;using the First Amendment&quot; while &quot;going after people for exercising their First Amendment rights.&quot;Pritzker extended his criticism to Trump's Justice Department leadership, saying the administration &quot;seems full of people who are just following whatever this demented president tells them to do.&quot; He specifically mentioned Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, claiming he's &quot;doing more of what Pam Bondi was doing&quot; - an apparent reference to the Attorney General's approach to prosecutions.The comments represent some of the harshest rhetoric from a sitting Democratic governor since Trump took office. Pritzker's defense of Comey comes as the former FBI chief faces mounting legal pressure from the Justice Department over his social media activities.The Illinois governor's remarks highlight the deepening partisan divide over Trump's use of federal prosecutorial power against former officials from previous administrations. Democrats increasingly argue that Trump is settling political scores rather than pursuing legitimate law enforcement objectives.Watch for other Democratic governors to follow Pritzker's lead in directly challenging Trump's Justice Department tactics as the Comey case moves forward in federal court.

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker launched a blistering attack on President Donald Trump Tuesday, calling him "demented" and "guilty of inciting violence" during an appearance on MSNBC's "Deadline."

Pritzker defended former FBI Director James Comey against his second federal indictment over a social media post featuring seashells arranged as "86 47." The Illinois Democrat predicted the case will be "thrown out," dismissing the evidence as "seashells on a beach."

"Let's start with what Donald Trump is really after here: weaponizing the DOJ to go after his political enemies," Pritzker said. He noted that Comey himself pulled down the post "because he thought it might be rude or improper," not because he considered it a threat against the president.

Pritzker then turned the tables on Trump's rhetoric, citing specific examples of what he called presidential incitement. "Remember, this is the president who threatened the death penalty for General Mark Milley, the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff," he said. "This is the same guy who told crowds at his rallies that, oh, that protester, punch him, take him down."

The governor also accused Trump of celebrating the death of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller, calling Mueller "a patriot." Pritzker characterized Trump as "using the First Amendment" while "going after people for exercising their First Amendment rights."

Pritzker extended his criticism to Trump's Justice Department leadership, saying the administration "seems full of people who are just following whatever this demented president tells them to do." He specifically mentioned Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, claiming he's "doing more of what Pam Bondi was doing" - an apparent reference to the Attorney General's approach to prosecutions.

The comments represent some of the harshest rhetoric from a sitting Democratic governor since Trump took office. Pritzker's defense of Comey comes as the former FBI chief faces mounting legal pressure from the Justice Department over his social media activities.

The Illinois governor's remarks highlight the deepening partisan divide over Trump's use of federal prosecutorial power against former officials from previous administrations. Democrats increasingly argue that Trump is settling political scores rather than pursuing legitimate law enforcement objectives.

Watch for other Democratic governors to follow Pritzker's lead in directly challenging Trump's Justice Department tactics as the Comey case moves forward in federal court.

Gov. JB Pritzker defended James Comey's seashell post indictment on MSNBC Tuesday, accusing Trump of weaponizing DOJ against political enemies.

Illinois Gov. Pritzker Calls Trump 'Demented,' Says He's 'Guilty of Inciting Violence'

The White House is crafting new guidance that would allow federal agencies to bypass Anthropic's supply chain risk designation and resume using the AI company's models, including its most advanced system called Mythos, according to sources familiar with the discussions.The move signals the Trump administration's willingness to override security concerns that previously blocked agencies from working with the San Francisco-based AI firm. Anthropic had been flagged for supply chain risks, effectively cutting off government access to its Claude AI assistant and other products.The new guidance would create a pathway for agencies to &quot;get around&quot; the risk designation rather than removing it entirely. This approach allows the administration to maintain the appearance of security vigilance while restoring access to AI capabilities that some officials consider essential for maintaining America's technological edge.Mythos represents Anthropic's most powerful AI model to date, potentially offering capabilities that surpass existing government AI tools. The system's advanced reasoning and analysis features could prove valuable for national security applications, intelligence analysis, and policy research across federal agencies.The supply chain risk designation typically applies to companies with foreign ownership stakes, manufacturing dependencies, or other factors that could compromise sensitive government data. Anthropic has received funding from Google and Amazon, raising questions about data flows and corporate influence over AI development.Federal agencies have increasingly relied on AI tools for everything from document analysis to cybersecurity monitoring. The Anthropic ban forced many departments to seek alternative providers or delay AI integration projects, potentially putting American capabilities behind international competitors.The timing coincides with broader Trump administration efforts to accelerate AI adoption across government while maintaining security guardrails. Officials have emphasized the need to balance innovation with protection of classified information and critical infrastructure.Sources declined to specify which agencies would gain access under the new guidance or what security measures would accompany the policy change. The White House has not publicly confirmed the discussions or provided a timeline for implementation.The decision to work around rather than remove the risk designation suggests ongoing concerns about Anthropic's supply chain relationships. This middle-ground approach allows agencies to access needed AI capabilities while preserving the administration's tough stance on technology security.Industry observers will watch whether similar workarounds emerge for other AI companies facing federal restrictions, potentially reshaping how the government balances security concerns against technological competitiveness in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence sector.

The White House is crafting new guidance that would allow federal agencies to bypass Anthropic's supply chain risk designation and resume using the AI company's models, including its most advanced system called Mythos, according to sources familiar with the discussions.

The move signals the Trump administration's willingness to override security concerns that previously blocked agencies from working with the San Francisco-based AI firm. Anthropic had been flagged for supply chain risks, effectively cutting off government access to its Claude AI assistant and other products.

The new guidance would create a pathway for agencies to "get around" the risk designation rather than removing it entirely. This approach allows the administration to maintain the appearance of security vigilance while restoring access to AI capabilities that some officials consider essential for maintaining America's technological edge.

Mythos represents Anthropic's most powerful AI model to date, potentially offering capabilities that surpass existing government AI tools. The system's advanced reasoning and analysis features could prove valuable for national security applications, intelligence analysis, and policy research across federal agencies.

The supply chain risk designation typically applies to companies with foreign ownership stakes, manufacturing dependencies, or other factors that could compromise sensitive government data. Anthropic has received funding from Google and Amazon, raising questions about data flows and corporate influence over AI development.

Federal agencies have increasingly relied on AI tools for everything from document analysis to cybersecurity monitoring. The Anthropic ban forced many departments to seek alternative providers or delay AI integration projects, potentially putting American capabilities behind international competitors.

The timing coincides with broader Trump administration efforts to accelerate AI adoption across government while maintaining security guardrails. Officials have emphasized the need to balance innovation with protection of classified information and critical infrastructure.

Sources declined to specify which agencies would gain access under the new guidance or what security measures would accompany the policy change. The White House has not publicly confirmed the discussions or provided a timeline for implementation.

The decision to work around rather than remove the risk designation suggests ongoing concerns about Anthropic's supply chain relationships. This middle-ground approach allows agencies to access needed AI capabilities while preserving the administration's tough stance on technology security.

Industry observers will watch whether similar workarounds emerge for other AI companies facing federal restrictions, potentially reshaping how the government balances security concerns against technological competitiveness in the rapidly evolving artificial intelligence sector.

Trump administration developing guidance to bypass Anthropic's supply chain risk designation, allowing agencies to access new AI models including Mythos.

White House Plans Workaround to Bring Back Anthropic AI After Supply Chain Ban

Gina Carano says Disney has gone quiet since settling her lawsuit in August 2025, as the former &quot;Mandalorian&quot; actress prepares for a high-profile MMA return against Ronda Rousey on May 16 at the Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California.In a new interview with Evie Magazine, Carano reflected on how the narrative around her firing has shifted since she was dropped from the Disney+ series over social media posts that sparked controversy. The actress says the media reaction at the time now looks out of step with current discourse.&quot;Back then it was called conspiracy theories,&quot; Carano said. &quot;And I'm like, with my conspiracies, I'm batting a hundred right now. The questions I was asking were questions other people were wanting to ask.&quot;Carano pointed to the stark difference in coverage between her initial firing and the lawsuit settlement. She believes Disney's silence after reaching the legal agreement tells its own story, especially compared to how the company publicly described her departure versus how it handled the resolution.The actress says the climate had become so restrictive that basic discourse was impossible. &quot;We got to the point where we couldn't even ask, or counter the narrative, or even make a joke. Comedians suffered for it. People just stated facts that people didn't like. That was a wild time. It was not that long ago.&quot;Despite the public controversy, Carano made clear she harbors no ill will toward &quot;The Mandalorian&quot; creative team. &quot;I never had a problem with Dave Filoni and Jon Favreau. I thought they were always wonderful,&quot; she said, suggesting her experience with the show's creators never matched the online narrative surrounding her exit.Carano's case became a high-profile example of Hollywood's cancel culture battles, with her firing sparking debates about free speech and corporate accountability. Her legal victory against Disney marked a rare win for a public figure who challenged the entertainment industry's response to controversial social media activity.Now Carano is rebuilding her career on her own terms, with the Netflix-promoted MMA bout representing her biggest platform since leaving Hollywood. Both fighters are returning after lengthy retirements, setting up what promoters are billing as a major comeback fight.The May 16 showdown will test whether Carano can translate her legal and cultural victories into a successful return to the octagon, while giving her the kind of mainstream attention that has been largely absent since her Disney settlement.

Gina Carano says Disney has gone quiet since settling her lawsuit in August 2025, as the former "Mandalorian" actress prepares for a high-profile MMA return against Ronda Rousey on May 16 at the Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California.

In a new interview with Evie Magazine, Carano reflected on how the narrative around her firing has shifted since she was dropped from the Disney+ series over social media posts that sparked controversy. The actress says the media reaction at the time now looks out of step with current discourse.

"Back then it was called conspiracy theories," Carano said. "And I'm like, with my conspiracies, I'm batting a hundred right now. The questions I was asking were questions other people were wanting to ask."

Carano pointed to the stark difference in coverage between her initial firing and the lawsuit settlement. She believes Disney's silence after reaching the legal agreement tells its own story, especially compared to how the company publicly described her departure versus how it handled the resolution.

The actress says the climate had become so restrictive that basic discourse was impossible. "We got to the point where we couldn't even ask, or counter the narrative, or even make a joke. Comedians suffered for it. People just stated facts that people didn't like. That was a wild time. It was not that long ago."

Despite the public controversy, Carano made clear she harbors no ill will toward "The Mandalorian" creative team. "I never had a problem with Dave Filoni and Jon Favreau. I thought they were always wonderful," she said, suggesting her experience with the show's creators never matched the online narrative surrounding her exit.

Carano's case became a high-profile example of Hollywood's cancel culture battles, with her firing sparking debates about free speech and corporate accountability. Her legal victory against Disney marked a rare win for a public figure who challenged the entertainment industry's response to controversial social media activity.

Now Carano is rebuilding her career on her own terms, with the Netflix-promoted MMA bout representing her biggest platform since leaving Hollywood. Both fighters are returning after lengthy retirements, setting up what promoters are billing as a major comeback fight.

The May 16 showdown will test whether Carano can translate her legal and cultural victories into a successful return to the octagon, while giving her the kind of mainstream attention that has been largely absent since her Disney settlement.

Former Mandalorian actress Gina Carano discusses her Disney settlement and upcoming May 16 MMA fight against Ronda Rousey after years of cancel culture battles.