InsiderWire Staff

President Trump declared Iran's navy &quot;destroyed&quot; and confirmed a comprehensive oil blockade against the Islamic Republic begins Monday morning, speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews after returning from Florida.&quot;Their military is destroyed,&quot; Trump said Sunday evening. &quot;Their whole Navy is underwater. You know that 158 ships are gone. Their navy is gone. Most of their mine droppers are gone.&quot; The president announced the blockade takes effect at 10 a.m. Monday, with &quot;other nations working so that Iran will not be able to sell oil.&quot;Trump positioned the blockade as an economic opportunity for America's energy sector. &quot;There are many boats heading toward our country to fill up with oil and then go and take it,&quot; he said, highlighting how international vessels are bypassing traditional routes to purchase American crude. The move follows <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/oil-hits-100-as-iran-peace-talks-collapse-trump-threatens-blockade">collapsed peace negotiations</a> that sent oil prices soaring past $100 per barrel.The president delivered sharp criticism of NATO allies, threatening to review America's financial commitment to the alliance. &quot;I'm very disappointed in NATO,&quot; Trump said. &quot;They weren't there for us. We pay trillions of dollars for NATO, and they weren't there for us.&quot; He dismissed recent European offers of support as insufficient and poorly timed.&quot;Now they want to come up, but there's no real threat anymore,&quot; Trump said, suggesting NATO countries waited too long to assist American operations. The president indicated America's &quot;trillions of dollars&quot; in NATO contributions face &quot;very serious&quot; examination going forward.Trump's blockade announcement represents the most aggressive economic warfare against Iran since <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/vance-21-hour-iran-talks-fail-bad-news-for-iran">diplomatic talks collapsed</a> in Pakistan last week. The multinational effort aims to completely cut off Iran's oil revenues, which fund the regime's nuclear program and regional proxy forces threatening American interests.The timing puts maximum pressure on Iran's economy while American energy producers stand ready to fill global supply gaps. Trump's strategy leverages U.S. energy independence to isolate Iran economically without relying on European allies who disappointed Washington during the crisis.Monday's blockade implementation will test international resolve and Iran's response capabilities. Oil markets and shipping routes through the Persian Gulf face immediate disruption as the most comprehensive sanctions regime against Iran takes effect.

President Trump declared Iran's navy "destroyed" and confirmed a comprehensive oil blockade against the Islamic Republic begins Monday morning, speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews after returning from Florida.

"Their military is destroyed," Trump said Sunday evening. "Their whole Navy is underwater. You know that 158 ships are gone. Their navy is gone. Most of their mine droppers are gone." The president announced the blockade takes effect at 10 a.m. Monday, with "other nations working so that Iran will not be able to sell oil."

Trump positioned the blockade as an economic opportunity for America's energy sector. "There are many boats heading toward our country to fill up with oil and then go and take it," he said, highlighting how international vessels are bypassing traditional routes to purchase American crude. The move follows collapsed peace negotiations that sent oil prices soaring past $100 per barrel.

The president delivered sharp criticism of NATO allies, threatening to review America's financial commitment to the alliance. "I'm very disappointed in NATO," Trump said. "They weren't there for us. We pay trillions of dollars for NATO, and they weren't there for us." He dismissed recent European offers of support as insufficient and poorly timed.

"Now they want to come up, but there's no real threat anymore," Trump said, suggesting NATO countries waited too long to assist American operations. The president indicated America's "trillions of dollars" in NATO contributions face "very serious" examination going forward.

Trump's blockade announcement represents the most aggressive economic warfare against Iran since diplomatic talks collapsed in Pakistan last week. The multinational effort aims to completely cut off Iran's oil revenues, which fund the regime's nuclear program and regional proxy forces threatening American interests.

The timing puts maximum pressure on Iran's economy while American energy producers stand ready to fill global supply gaps. Trump's strategy leverages U.S. energy independence to isolate Iran economically without relying on European allies who disappointed Washington during the crisis.

Monday's blockade implementation will test international resolve and Iran's response capabilities. Oil markets and shipping routes through the Persian Gulf face immediate disruption as the most comprehensive sanctions regime against Iran takes effect.

President Trump declared Iran's 158-ship navy destroyed and confirmed a sweeping oil blockade begins Monday while criticizing NATO allies for lack of support.

Trump: Iran Navy 'Destroyed,' Oil Blockade Starts Monday

Former staffers of Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) signed a letter demanding he quit his gubernatorial campaign and resign from Congress while calling on law enforcement to launch a &quot;full and thorough investigation&quot; of the California Democrat.The letter marks an unprecedented revolt from Swalwell's own former employees, adding internal pressure to mounting external calls for his departure. The staffers did not specify the nature of the allegations prompting their demand for a criminal investigation, but their coordinated action signals serious concerns from those who worked closest with the congressman.Swalwell faces mounting pressure from multiple fronts. <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/california-democrats-desert-swalwells-governor-bid-call-for-resignation">California Democrats have already abandoned his governor bid</a>, with several party leaders publicly calling for his resignation. The Manhattan District Attorney has opened a criminal probe into sex assault claims against him, further complicating his political future.The congressman's troubles extend beyond personal allegations. <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/bipartisan-push-gains-steam-to-expel-swalwell-gonzales-from-congress">Bipartisan momentum is building in Congress</a> to formally expel both Swalwell and Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) from the House, a rare disciplinary action that requires a two-thirds majority vote.Swalwell previously faced scrutiny over his relationship with suspected Chinese spy Christine Fang, who targeted politicians through romantic and sexual relationships. That controversy led to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee in 2023, but he retained his House seat and later launched his gubernatorial campaign.The former staffers' letter represents a significant escalation because it comes from people who worked directly under Swalwell and presumably had detailed knowledge of his conduct and operations. Their willingness to go public with calls for both resignation and criminal investigation suggests they possess information about potential wrongdoing that goes beyond what's already public.For House Republicans, the letter provides additional ammunition in their effort to expel Swalwell. The bipartisan nature of criticism, combined with internal revolt from his own staff, strengthens their case that his presence damages the institution's credibility.Congressional expulsion remains rare in American history, reserved for the most serious offenses. Only five House members have been expelled since 1789 – three during the Civil War for supporting the Confederacy and two following criminal convictions for corruption.The timing couldn't be worse for California Democrats, who now face the prospect of defending a gubernatorial candidate under criminal investigation while his former employees publicly question his fitness for office. Party leaders may face pressure to formally withdraw support and recruit an alternative candidate.Swalwell's office has not responded to the staffers' demands or indicated whether he plans to step aside from either his House seat or gubernatorial campaign. His next public appearance will be closely watched for signs of how he plans to address the growing chorus of resignation calls from former allies, party leaders, and now his own former staff.

Former staffers of Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) signed a letter demanding he quit his gubernatorial campaign and resign from Congress while calling on law enforcement to launch a "full and thorough investigation" of the California Democrat.

The letter marks an unprecedented revolt from Swalwell's own former employees, adding internal pressure to mounting external calls for his departure. The staffers did not specify the nature of the allegations prompting their demand for a criminal investigation, but their coordinated action signals serious concerns from those who worked closest with the congressman.

Swalwell faces mounting pressure from multiple fronts. California Democrats have already abandoned his governor bid, with several party leaders publicly calling for his resignation. The Manhattan District Attorney has opened a criminal probe into sex assault claims against him, further complicating his political future.

The congressman's troubles extend beyond personal allegations. Bipartisan momentum is building in Congress to formally expel both Swalwell and Rep. Tony Gonzales (R-TX) from the House, a rare disciplinary action that requires a two-thirds majority vote.

Swalwell previously faced scrutiny over his relationship with suspected Chinese spy Christine Fang, who targeted politicians through romantic and sexual relationships. That controversy led to his removal from the House Intelligence Committee in 2023, but he retained his House seat and later launched his gubernatorial campaign.

The former staffers' letter represents a significant escalation because it comes from people who worked directly under Swalwell and presumably had detailed knowledge of his conduct and operations. Their willingness to go public with calls for both resignation and criminal investigation suggests they possess information about potential wrongdoing that goes beyond what's already public.

For House Republicans, the letter provides additional ammunition in their effort to expel Swalwell. The bipartisan nature of criticism, combined with internal revolt from his own staff, strengthens their case that his presence damages the institution's credibility.

Congressional expulsion remains rare in American history, reserved for the most serious offenses. Only five House members have been expelled since 1789 – three during the Civil War for supporting the Confederacy and two following criminal convictions for corruption.

The timing couldn't be worse for California Democrats, who now face the prospect of defending a gubernatorial candidate under criminal investigation while his former employees publicly question his fitness for office. Party leaders may face pressure to formally withdraw support and recruit an alternative candidate.

Swalwell's office has not responded to the staffers' demands or indicated whether he plans to step aside from either his House seat or gubernatorial campaign. His next public appearance will be closely watched for signs of how he plans to address the growing chorus of resignation calls from former allies, party leaders, and now his own former staff.

Former staffers of Rep. Eric Swalwell signed a letter calling for law enforcement investigation and demanding his resignation from Congress and governor race.

Former Swalwell Staffers Demand His Resignation, Call for Criminal Probe

Pope Leo XIV has positioned himself as a direct critic of President Trump's foreign and domestic policies, marking the first time an American-born pope has challenged a sitting U.S. president on key national security issues. The 70-year-old pontiff, born Robert Prevost in Chicago, spoke against both the Iran war and mass deportations before Trump <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/trump-announces-two-week-iran-ceasefire-as-strait-of-hormuz-reopens?language_id=1">announced the Iran ceasefire</a> this week.Leo's criticism began in January with a speech condemning U.S. military action in Venezuela. The Pentagon subsequently called in the Vatican's U.S. ambassador for what two church officials described as an &quot;unpleasant and contentious&quot; meeting, though both sides later characterized it as routine.Three American cardinals told CBS News they support the pope's increasingly vocal stance. Cardinals Joseph Tobin of Newark, Blase Cupich of Chicago, and Robert McElroy of Washington D.C. — the only three American cardinals actively serving dioceses — defended Leo's right to speak on moral issues affecting global peace.&quot;He's the pastor of the world. He's not a pundit,&quot; Cardinal Tobin explained. &quot;So the distinction is he's not going to pronounce on everything. But he's going to pronounce on what's important.&quot; The cardinals said they hear &quot;anxieties of people about the threats to peace at all different levels&quot; from parishioners in their dioceses.When asked directly about Middle East peace in March, Pope Leo told CBS: &quot;I am praying for peace, I hope that ceasefire would be the most effective way to work together to find peace for all parties, to respect all parties and to come to a solution, which is too many years, and you know, creating problems for everyone.&quot;The pope's criticism extends beyond foreign policy to Trump's immigration enforcement. Leo has spoken against mass deportations, putting him at odds with an administration policy that enjoys broad Republican support. His stance carries weight among the 53 million American Catholics who make up the largest Christian denomination in the United States.Cardinal Cupich noted the historic nature of having an American pope, saying Chicago can now claim it &quot;produced a pope.&quot; But Leo's willingness to challenge American policy creates an unusual dynamic where a former Chicagoan leads global Catholic opposition to his home country's government.The pope's intervention comes as Trump faces pressure from both directions on Iran policy — some Republicans want him to &quot;finish the job&quot; militarily while others push for diplomatic solutions. Leo's moral authority as the first American pope adds a new voice to that debate, one that carries influence with Catholic voters across swing states.Watch whether Leo escalates his criticism if the Iran ceasefire collapses or if immigration enforcement intensifies. His willingness to challenge Trump directly signals the Vatican may play a more active role in opposing American foreign policy than any pope has attempted in decades.

Pope Leo XIV has positioned himself as a direct critic of President Trump's foreign and domestic policies, marking the first time an American-born pope has challenged a sitting U.S. president on key national security issues. The 70-year-old pontiff, born Robert Prevost in Chicago, spoke against both the Iran war and mass deportations before Trump announced the Iran ceasefire this week.

Leo's criticism began in January with a speech condemning U.S. military action in Venezuela. The Pentagon subsequently called in the Vatican's U.S. ambassador for what two church officials described as an "unpleasant and contentious" meeting, though both sides later characterized it as routine.

Three American cardinals told CBS News they support the pope's increasingly vocal stance. Cardinals Joseph Tobin of Newark, Blase Cupich of Chicago, and Robert McElroy of Washington D.C. — the only three American cardinals actively serving dioceses — defended Leo's right to speak on moral issues affecting global peace.

"He's the pastor of the world. He's not a pundit," Cardinal Tobin explained. "So the distinction is he's not going to pronounce on everything. But he's going to pronounce on what's important." The cardinals said they hear "anxieties of people about the threats to peace at all different levels" from parishioners in their dioceses.

When asked directly about Middle East peace in March, Pope Leo told CBS: "I am praying for peace, I hope that ceasefire would be the most effective way to work together to find peace for all parties, to respect all parties and to come to a solution, which is too many years, and you know, creating problems for everyone."

The pope's criticism extends beyond foreign policy to Trump's immigration enforcement. Leo has spoken against mass deportations, putting him at odds with an administration policy that enjoys broad Republican support. His stance carries weight among the 53 million American Catholics who make up the largest Christian denomination in the United States.

Cardinal Cupich noted the historic nature of having an American pope, saying Chicago can now claim it "produced a pope." But Leo's willingness to challenge American policy creates an unusual dynamic where a former Chicagoan leads global Catholic opposition to his home country's government.

The pope's intervention comes as Trump faces pressure from both directions on Iran policy — some Republicans want him to "finish the job" militarily while others push for diplomatic solutions. Leo's moral authority as the first American pope adds a new voice to that debate, one that carries influence with Catholic voters across swing states.

Watch whether Leo escalates his criticism if the Iran ceasefire collapses or if immigration enforcement intensifies. His willingness to challenge Trump directly signals the Vatican may play a more active role in opposing American foreign policy than any pope has attempted in decades.

Pope Leo XIV, the first American pontiff, has emerged as vocal critic of Trump's Iran war and deportation policies, inspiring U.S. cardinals to speak out.

American Pope Leo XIV Challenges Trump on Iran War, Immigration

Oil prices broke through $100 per barrel Sunday as markets reopened following the collapse of U.S.-Iran peace negotiations and renewed threats from President Trump to impose a naval blockade on Iranian energy exports.The price surge marks the highest oil has traded since the current Middle East crisis began, driven by investor fears that diplomatic failure will lead to renewed military confrontation in the Persian Gulf. Brent crude jumped 8% in early Asian trading, while West Texas Intermediate climbed above the psychologically important $100 threshold for the first time in months.The failed talks, as Insider Wire <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/vance-21-hour-iran-talks-fail-bad-news-for-iran?language_id=1">previously reported</a>, ended after 21 hours of negotiations in Pakistan with no agreement on Iran's nuclear program or regional military activities. Vice President Vance called the outcome &quot;bad news for Iran&quot; but offered few details on next steps.Trump quickly escalated tensions Sunday morning, threatening to deploy the Navy to enforce what he called a &quot;complete energy blockade&quot; of Iran if Tehran continues uranium enrichment activities. The president <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/trump-pitches-iran-blockade-as-sales-tool-for-us-oil-exports?language_id=1">has pitched such measures</a> as beneficial to American oil producers, arguing that reduced Iranian exports would boost U.S. energy revenues.Energy markets are pricing in significant supply disruption risks, with Iran controlling roughly 10% of global oil production and maintaining the ability to block the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint through which 20% of world petroleum passes. Any military action could remove millions of barrels per day from global markets at a time when strategic reserves remain below historical averages.The price spike hits American consumers directly through higher gasoline costs, with analysts predicting pump prices could climb toward $4 per gallon nationally if crude oil remains above $100. The timing complicates Trump's domestic agenda, as energy inflation typically weighs on consumer spending and economic growth.Republican lawmakers have pressed Trump to take decisive action against Iran following the diplomatic failure, arguing that prolonged uncertainty damages both American credibility and global stability. The administration now faces pressure to either negotiate from a position of strength or follow through on military threats that carry significant economic and geopolitical risks.Markets will watch closely for any signs of Iranian retaliation or further U.S. military positioning in the coming days, with oil traders expecting continued volatility until the standoff reaches resolution.

Oil prices broke through $100 per barrel Sunday as markets reopened following the collapse of U.S.-Iran peace negotiations and renewed threats from President Trump to impose a naval blockade on Iranian energy exports.

The price surge marks the highest oil has traded since the current Middle East crisis began, driven by investor fears that diplomatic failure will lead to renewed military confrontation in the Persian Gulf. Brent crude jumped 8% in early Asian trading, while West Texas Intermediate climbed above the psychologically important $100 threshold for the first time in months.

The failed talks, as Insider Wire previously reported, ended after 21 hours of negotiations in Pakistan with no agreement on Iran's nuclear program or regional military activities. Vice President Vance called the outcome "bad news for Iran" but offered few details on next steps.

Trump quickly escalated tensions Sunday morning, threatening to deploy the Navy to enforce what he called a "complete energy blockade" of Iran if Tehran continues uranium enrichment activities. The president has pitched such measures as beneficial to American oil producers, arguing that reduced Iranian exports would boost U.S. energy revenues.

Energy markets are pricing in significant supply disruption risks, with Iran controlling roughly 10% of global oil production and maintaining the ability to block the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint through which 20% of world petroleum passes. Any military action could remove millions of barrels per day from global markets at a time when strategic reserves remain below historical averages.

The price spike hits American consumers directly through higher gasoline costs, with analysts predicting pump prices could climb toward $4 per gallon nationally if crude oil remains above $100. The timing complicates Trump's domestic agenda, as energy inflation typically weighs on consumer spending and economic growth.

Republican lawmakers have pressed Trump to take decisive action against Iran following the diplomatic failure, arguing that prolonged uncertainty damages both American credibility and global stability. The administration now faces pressure to either negotiate from a position of strength or follow through on military threats that carry significant economic and geopolitical risks.

Markets will watch closely for any signs of Iranian retaliation or further U.S. military positioning in the coming days, with oil traders expecting continued volatility until the standoff reaches resolution.

Oil prices surged above $100 per barrel Sunday after U.S.-Iran peace negotiations failed and Trump threatened new blockade measures against Tehran.

Oil Hits $100 as Iran Peace Talks Collapse, Trump Threatens Blockade

House Republicans plan to pair expulsion resolutions targeting Democrat Eric Swalwell and Republican Tony Gonzales, creating the first bipartisan ejection effort in decades as both parties seek to purge members accused of sexual misconduct.Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announced Sunday she will combine her resolution to expel Swalwell, who faces rape allegations he denies, with one targeting Gonzales over his acknowledged affair with a staffer who later died by suicide. The Florida Republican's strategy has drawn support from Democrats who previously resisted partisan removal efforts.&quot;He should step aside,&quot; Rep. Ro Khanna told Fox News about his fellow California Democrat Swalwell. &quot;What he did is sick and disgusting. There need to be consequences to that.&quot; Khanna indicated he would vote to expel Swalwell if paired with removing &quot;similarly abhorrent&quot; Republicans.The momentum represents a dramatic shift for Swalwell, whose gubernatorial campaign has collapsed as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/california-democrats-desert-swalwells-governor-bid-call-for-resignation?language_id=1">California Democrats desert his bid</a> and Manhattan prosecutors open a criminal investigation. At least four women have accused the Intelligence Committee member of unwanted advances or sexual assault in recent reports.Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida told NBC he would vote to expel both men. &quot;These allegations are despicable and they demean the integrity of Congress. As far as I'm concerned, both gentlemen need to go home,&quot; he said.Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal described the alleged behavior as part of &quot;a depravity&quot; among powerful men that &quot;cuts across party lines.&quot; When asked if she would vote to expel both Swalwell and Gonzales, Jayapal responded: &quot;I would.&quot;The bipartisan disgust breaks traditional party-line protection patterns that typically shield members from expulsion votes. Only five House members have been expelled in American history — three during the Civil War and two after federal criminal convictions.Swalwell's position on the Intelligence Committee, which handles classified national security information, adds urgency to calls for his removal. The congressman previously faced scrutiny over his relationship with suspected Chinese spy Christine Fang but retained his security clearance and committee seat.Gonzales has acknowledged the extramarital affair but contests details surrounding his former staffer's death. The Texas Republican has not announced whether he will seek re-election in 2026.Reps. Eugene Vindman of Virginia and Jared Huffman of California have called on Swalwell to resign both his House seat and end his gubernatorial campaign. The unified Democratic opposition signals Swalwell's political isolation even within his own party.Luna's paired resolution strategy could force a floor vote within weeks. House rules require expulsion resolutions to receive priority consideration, though leadership controls the exact timing. A two-thirds majority in both chambers would be needed to remove either member.The expulsion push comes as both parties face pressure to address sexual misconduct allegations that have plagued Congress for years. The bipartisan nature of Luna's approach may provide political cover for members who previously avoided removal votes along party lines.

House Republicans plan to pair expulsion resolutions targeting Democrat Eric Swalwell and Republican Tony Gonzales, creating the first bipartisan ejection effort in decades as both parties seek to purge members accused of sexual misconduct.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna announced Sunday she will combine her resolution to expel Swalwell, who faces rape allegations he denies, with one targeting Gonzales over his acknowledged affair with a staffer who later died by suicide. The Florida Republican's strategy has drawn support from Democrats who previously resisted partisan removal efforts.

"He should step aside," Rep. Ro Khanna told Fox News about his fellow California Democrat Swalwell. "What he did is sick and disgusting. There need to be consequences to that." Khanna indicated he would vote to expel Swalwell if paired with removing "similarly abhorrent" Republicans.

The momentum represents a dramatic shift for Swalwell, whose gubernatorial campaign has collapsed as California Democrats desert his bid and Manhattan prosecutors open a criminal investigation. At least four women have accused the Intelligence Committee member of unwanted advances or sexual assault in recent reports.

Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida told NBC he would vote to expel both men. "These allegations are despicable and they demean the integrity of Congress. As far as I'm concerned, both gentlemen need to go home," he said.

Democratic Rep. Pramila Jayapal described the alleged behavior as part of "a depravity" among powerful men that "cuts across party lines." When asked if she would vote to expel both Swalwell and Gonzales, Jayapal responded: "I would."

The bipartisan disgust breaks traditional party-line protection patterns that typically shield members from expulsion votes. Only five House members have been expelled in American history — three during the Civil War and two after federal criminal convictions.

Swalwell's position on the Intelligence Committee, which handles classified national security information, adds urgency to calls for his removal. The congressman previously faced scrutiny over his relationship with suspected Chinese spy Christine Fang but retained his security clearance and committee seat.

Gonzales has acknowledged the extramarital affair but contests details surrounding his former staffer's death. The Texas Republican has not announced whether he will seek re-election in 2026.

Reps. Eugene Vindman of Virginia and Jared Huffman of California have called on Swalwell to resign both his House seat and end his gubernatorial campaign. The unified Democratic opposition signals Swalwell's political isolation even within his own party.

Luna's paired resolution strategy could force a floor vote within weeks. House rules require expulsion resolutions to receive priority consideration, though leadership controls the exact timing. A two-thirds majority in both chambers would be needed to remove either member.

The expulsion push comes as both parties face pressure to address sexual misconduct allegations that have plagued Congress for years. The bipartisan nature of Luna's approach may provide political cover for members who previously avoided removal votes along party lines.

Republicans and Democrats unite to expel Eric Swalwell over rape allegations and Tony Gonzales over staffer affair. Both deny wrongdoing but face mounting press

Bipartisan Push Gains Steam to Expel Swalwell, Gonzales from Congress

Republicans and Democrats unite to expel Eric Swalwell over rape allegations and Tony Gonzales over staffer affair. Both deny wrongdoing but face mounting pressure.

Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the Justice Department will &quot;vigorously prosecute&quot; anyone involved in buying or selling Iranian crude oil under U.S. sanctions, signaling an aggressive enforcement push by the Trump administration.Blanche issued the warning in a post on X, declaring that authorities will take a hard line against sanctions violators. He emphasized that the Justice Department &quot;fully supports&quot; President Trump and the military in their Iran strategy.The threat comes as the Trump administration ramps up economic pressure on Tehran following <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/vance-iran-nuclear-talks-collapse-after-21-hours-in-pakistan?language_id=1">collapsed nuclear negotiations</a>. Iranian oil sales have continued through shadow networks despite years of sanctions, with buyers often using ship-to-ship transfers and false documentation to evade detection.The announcement puts international oil traders and shipping companies on notice that Washington intends to crack down harder on Iranian crude trafficking. Previous administrations have prosecuted sanctions violations, but the explicit warning suggests heightened enforcement priorities under Trump's return to maximum pressure tactics.Iran exports an estimated 1.3 million barrels per day despite sanctions, primarily to China and other buyers willing to risk U.S. penalties. These sales provide crucial revenue for Tehran's government and military programs, making oil sanctions a key leverage point in U.S. policy.The Justice Department's sanctions enforcement typically involves criminal charges against individuals and companies, asset freezes, and massive financial penalties. Recent cases have resulted in hundreds of millions in fines and prison sentences for violators.Blanche's statement also underscores the Justice Department's alignment with Trump's broader Iran strategy, which has included military threats and diplomatic isolation alongside economic pressure. The explicit mention of supporting &quot;the military&quot; suggests coordination between law enforcement and defense officials on Iran policy.Oil markets will likely monitor enforcement actions closely, as aggressive prosecution could further restrict Iranian exports and affect global supply. Any significant reduction in Iranian oil availability typically pushes prices higher, impacting American consumers at the pump.The warning sets the stage for potential high-profile prosecutions as the administration seeks to demonstrate resolve against Iran's sanctions evasion networks.

Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the Justice Department will "vigorously prosecute" anyone involved in buying or selling Iranian crude oil under U.S. sanctions, signaling an aggressive enforcement push by the Trump administration.

Blanche issued the warning in a post on X, declaring that authorities will take a hard line against sanctions violators. He emphasized that the Justice Department "fully supports" President Trump and the military in their Iran strategy.

The threat comes as the Trump administration ramps up economic pressure on Tehran following collapsed nuclear negotiations. Iranian oil sales have continued through shadow networks despite years of sanctions, with buyers often using ship-to-ship transfers and false documentation to evade detection.

The announcement puts international oil traders and shipping companies on notice that Washington intends to crack down harder on Iranian crude trafficking. Previous administrations have prosecuted sanctions violations, but the explicit warning suggests heightened enforcement priorities under Trump's return to maximum pressure tactics.

Iran exports an estimated 1.3 million barrels per day despite sanctions, primarily to China and other buyers willing to risk U.S. penalties. These sales provide crucial revenue for Tehran's government and military programs, making oil sanctions a key leverage point in U.S. policy.

The Justice Department's sanctions enforcement typically involves criminal charges against individuals and companies, asset freezes, and massive financial penalties. Recent cases have resulted in hundreds of millions in fines and prison sentences for violators.

Blanche's statement also underscores the Justice Department's alignment with Trump's broader Iran strategy, which has included military threats and diplomatic isolation alongside economic pressure. The explicit mention of supporting "the military" suggests coordination between law enforcement and defense officials on Iran policy.

Oil markets will likely monitor enforcement actions closely, as aggressive prosecution could further restrict Iranian exports and affect global supply. Any significant reduction in Iranian oil availability typically pushes prices higher, impacting American consumers at the pump.

The warning sets the stage for potential high-profile prosecutions as the administration seeks to demonstrate resolve against Iran's sanctions evasion networks.

Acting Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche warns of aggressive enforcement against Iranian oil trade as Trump administration escalates economic pressure.

Justice Dept. Vows 'Vigorous' Prosecution of Iran Oil Sanctions Violators

President Trump declared the U.S. Navy will &quot;clean out&quot; Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz after 21 hours of nuclear negotiations collapsed over Tehran's refusal to abandon its atomic weapons program.&quot;It won't take long to clean it out. So we're going to clean out the strait, and they'll be able to use the strait,&quot; Trump told Fox News Channel's &quot;Sunday Morning Futures.&quot; The president said the blockade operation &quot;will take a little while, but it'll be effective pretty soon.&quot;The talks involved Vice President JD Vance, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and senior advisor Jared Kushner in what Trump described as marathon negotiations with Iranian representatives. Trump said the administration secured &quot;just about every point we needed, except for the fact that they refused to give up their nuclear ambition.&quot;&quot;They want to have nuclear weapons, they're not going to have nuclear weapons,&quot; Trump stated flatly. &quot;I've been saying that for 30 years. I would never allow that to happen before I was in politics, and that country will not have nuclear weapons.&quot;The breakdown marks the latest escalation in Trump's maximum pressure campaign against Iran, following <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/vance-21-hour-iran-talks-fail-bad-news-for-iran?language_id=1">the collapse of marathon talks</a> that had raised hopes for a diplomatic solution. Iran's continued blockade of the strategic waterway threatens global energy supplies, with roughly 20% of the world's oil passing through the narrow channel between Iran and Oman.Trump emphasized the nuclear issue remained the central sticking point. &quot;Frankly, to me, that was the most important point by far,&quot; he said of Iran's atomic ambitions. The president noted the negotiations &quot;got very friendly&quot; toward the end but ultimately foundered on Tehran's unwillingness to dismantle its nuclear program entirely.The promised naval action would represent a major military escalation in the Persian Gulf, where U.S. and Iranian forces have engaged in a tense standoff for weeks. Any attempt to forcibly clear Iranian naval assets from the strait could trigger broader conflict in the region.For American consumers, success in reopening the waterway could provide relief from rising gas prices that have climbed steadily during the blockade. Energy markets have remained volatile as traders weigh the potential for both military action and diplomatic breakthrough.The president's 30-year opposition to Iranian nuclear weapons dates to his business career, when he repeatedly warned about the dangers of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. His administration withdrew from the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal in his first term, reimposing harsh economic sanctions.Trump faces growing pressure from congressional Republicans to take decisive military action, while also managing concerns from allies about regional stability. The timing of any naval operation will likely depend on final preparations and coordination with Gulf partners who support keeping the strait open to international shipping.

President Trump declared the U.S. Navy will "clean out" Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz after 21 hours of nuclear negotiations collapsed over Tehran's refusal to abandon its atomic weapons program.

"It won't take long to clean it out. So we're going to clean out the strait, and they'll be able to use the strait," Trump told Fox News Channel's "Sunday Morning Futures." The president said the blockade operation "will take a little while, but it'll be effective pretty soon."

The talks involved Vice President JD Vance, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and senior advisor Jared Kushner in what Trump described as marathon negotiations with Iranian representatives. Trump said the administration secured "just about every point we needed, except for the fact that they refused to give up their nuclear ambition."

"They want to have nuclear weapons, they're not going to have nuclear weapons," Trump stated flatly. "I've been saying that for 30 years. I would never allow that to happen before I was in politics, and that country will not have nuclear weapons."

The breakdown marks the latest escalation in Trump's maximum pressure campaign against Iran, following the collapse of marathon talks that had raised hopes for a diplomatic solution. Iran's continued blockade of the strategic waterway threatens global energy supplies, with roughly 20% of the world's oil passing through the narrow channel between Iran and Oman.

Trump emphasized the nuclear issue remained the central sticking point. "Frankly, to me, that was the most important point by far," he said of Iran's atomic ambitions. The president noted the negotiations "got very friendly" toward the end but ultimately foundered on Tehran's unwillingness to dismantle its nuclear program entirely.

The promised naval action would represent a major military escalation in the Persian Gulf, where U.S. and Iranian forces have engaged in a tense standoff for weeks. Any attempt to forcibly clear Iranian naval assets from the strait could trigger broader conflict in the region.

For American consumers, success in reopening the waterway could provide relief from rising gas prices that have climbed steadily during the blockade. Energy markets have remained volatile as traders weigh the potential for both military action and diplomatic breakthrough.

The president's 30-year opposition to Iranian nuclear weapons dates to his business career, when he repeatedly warned about the dangers of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. His administration withdrew from the Obama-era Iran nuclear deal in his first term, reimposing harsh economic sanctions.

Trump faces growing pressure from congressional Republicans to take decisive military action, while also managing concerns from allies about regional stability. The timing of any naval operation will likely depend on final preparations and coordination with Gulf partners who support keeping the strait open to international shipping.

President Trump promises swift military action to clear Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz following breakdown of 21-hour negotiations over nuclear weapons

Trump Vows Navy Will 'Clean Out' Strait of Hormuz After Iran Nuclear Talks Collapse

President Trump promises swift military action to clear Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz following breakdown of 21-hour negotiations over nuclear weapons.

California Democrats are abandoning Rep. Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign in record numbers while demanding he resign from Congress entirely. The mass exodus comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/manhattan-da-opens-criminal-probe-into-swalwell-sex-assault-claims?language_id=1">criminal investigations intensify</a> around the embattled Democrat.State Senator Maria Rodriguez became the latest high-profile Democrat to withdraw her endorsement Friday, telling reporters Swalwell &quot;no longer represents California values.&quot; Her defection follows similar moves by Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass this week.The congressman's campaign schedule shows the damage. Swalwell cancelled three fundraising events in San Francisco and pulled TV ads from Sacramento markets. Campaign finance records reveal his operation burned through $2.3 million in the first quarter while raising just $890,000.House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries stopped short of calling for Swalwell's resignation but said the allegations &quot;raise serious questions about his ability to serve.&quot; Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee officials confirmed they suspended all support for Swalwell's reelection bid.Swalwell maintains his innocence and vows to continue both campaigns. His spokesman dismissed the criticism as &quot;political theater&quot; from jealous rivals. The congressman appeared at a sparsely attended town hall in Sacramento Tuesday, drawing fewer than 200 supporters compared to overflow crowds earlier this year.Republican strategists see opportunity in California's blue stronghold. GOP gubernatorial candidate John Cox called the Swalwell controversy &quot;a gift&quot; that exposes Democratic hypocrisy on accountability. Internal polling shows Cox trailing by just eight points statewide, the closest margin for a Republican in decades.The political crisis threatens House Democrats' narrow majority. California's 15th district leans Democratic by twelve points, but a special election during a scandal could flip the seat. Republicans need just four House pickups to reclaim control.Watch for more Democratic defections as Swalwell's legal troubles deepen and party leaders calculate the electoral damage ahead of November's midterms.

California Democrats are abandoning Rep. Eric Swalwell's gubernatorial campaign in record numbers while demanding he resign from Congress entirely. The mass exodus comes as criminal investigations intensify around the embattled Democrat.

State Senator Maria Rodriguez became the latest high-profile Democrat to withdraw her endorsement Friday, telling reporters Swalwell "no longer represents California values." Her defection follows similar moves by Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass this week.

The congressman's campaign schedule shows the damage. Swalwell cancelled three fundraising events in San Francisco and pulled TV ads from Sacramento markets. Campaign finance records reveal his operation burned through $2.3 million in the first quarter while raising just $890,000.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries stopped short of calling for Swalwell's resignation but said the allegations "raise serious questions about his ability to serve." Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee officials confirmed they suspended all support for Swalwell's reelection bid.

Swalwell maintains his innocence and vows to continue both campaigns. His spokesman dismissed the criticism as "political theater" from jealous rivals. The congressman appeared at a sparsely attended town hall in Sacramento Tuesday, drawing fewer than 200 supporters compared to overflow crowds earlier this year.

Republican strategists see opportunity in California's blue stronghold. GOP gubernatorial candidate John Cox called the Swalwell controversy "a gift" that exposes Democratic hypocrisy on accountability. Internal polling shows Cox trailing by just eight points statewide, the closest margin for a Republican in decades.

The political crisis threatens House Democrats' narrow majority. California's 15th district leans Democratic by twelve points, but a special election during a scandal could flip the seat. Republicans need just four House pickups to reclaim control.

Watch for more Democratic defections as Swalwell's legal troubles deepen and party leaders calculate the electoral damage ahead of November's midterms.

Democratic lawmakers abandon Rep. Eric Swalwell's California gubernatorial campaign and demand his resignation from Congress following mounting scandals.

California Democrats Desert Swalwell's Governor Bid, Call for Resignation

President Trump is using Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz as a sales pitch for American oil, telling countries cut off from Middle Eastern crude — especially China — to buy from the United States instead.The strategy capitalizes on America's transformation into the world's largest oil and gas producer and biggest exporter of liquefied natural gas. Trump sees Iran's chokehold on the vital shipping lane as an opportunity to expand US energy market share globally.China imports roughly 10 million barrels of oil daily, with a substantial portion flowing through the Strait of Hormuz before Iran's recent blockade disrupted global shipping routes. The strait typically handles about 21% of global petroleum liquids, making it one of the world's most critical energy chokepoints.Trump's oil diplomacy comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/republicans-push-trump-to-finish-the-job-on-iran-as-peace-talks-collapse">peace talks with Iran have collapsed</a>, leaving the administration to pursue alternative strategies that benefit American interests. The approach transforms a security crisis into an economic opportunity for US energy producers.American oil production has surged over the past decade thanks to fracking technology, reaching record levels that now exceed domestic consumption by millions of barrels daily. This surplus positions the US to fill supply gaps created by Iran's actions in the Persian Gulf.The timing benefits American oil companies and workers while potentially weakening Iran's leverage over global energy markets. Countries dependent on Persian Gulf oil face a choice: negotiate with Iran to reopen shipping lanes or secure alternative supplies from the United States.For China specifically, the blockade creates pressure to reduce energy dependence on Middle Eastern suppliers — a shift that could benefit US-China trade relations while advancing American strategic interests. Trump has previously used energy exports as diplomatic tools with allies and competitors alike.The success of Trump's oil sales pitch will depend on pricing, logistics, and how long Iran maintains its blockade of the crucial waterway that connects Middle Eastern oil fields to global markets.

President Trump is using Iran's blockade of the Strait of Hormuz as a sales pitch for American oil, telling countries cut off from Middle Eastern crude — especially China — to buy from the United States instead.

The strategy capitalizes on America's transformation into the world's largest oil and gas producer and biggest exporter of liquefied natural gas. Trump sees Iran's chokehold on the vital shipping lane as an opportunity to expand US energy market share globally.

China imports roughly 10 million barrels of oil daily, with a substantial portion flowing through the Strait of Hormuz before Iran's recent blockade disrupted global shipping routes. The strait typically handles about 21% of global petroleum liquids, making it one of the world's most critical energy chokepoints.

Trump's oil diplomacy comes as peace talks with Iran have collapsed, leaving the administration to pursue alternative strategies that benefit American interests. The approach transforms a security crisis into an economic opportunity for US energy producers.

American oil production has surged over the past decade thanks to fracking technology, reaching record levels that now exceed domestic consumption by millions of barrels daily. This surplus positions the US to fill supply gaps created by Iran's actions in the Persian Gulf.

The timing benefits American oil companies and workers while potentially weakening Iran's leverage over global energy markets. Countries dependent on Persian Gulf oil face a choice: negotiate with Iran to reopen shipping lanes or secure alternative supplies from the United States.

For China specifically, the blockade creates pressure to reduce energy dependence on Middle Eastern suppliers — a shift that could benefit US-China trade relations while advancing American strategic interests. Trump has previously used energy exports as diplomatic tools with allies and competitors alike.

The success of Trump's oil sales pitch will depend on pricing, logistics, and how long Iran maintains its blockade of the crucial waterway that connects Middle Eastern oil fields to global markets.

President Trump leverages Iran's Strait of Hormuz blockade to pitch American oil exports to China and other nations dependent on Middle Eastern crude supplies.

Trump Pitches Iran Blockade as Sales Tool for US Oil Exports

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) contradicted President Trump's weekend victory declaration over Iran, telling reporters Sunday the United States has not &quot;won&quot; until the Iranian regime is &quot;completely defanged.&quot;Trump announced Saturday that America had achieved victory in its conflict with Iran. But Johnson, speaking on Capitol Hill, said the mission remains incomplete. &quot;We will not have won until we have completely defanged the Iranian regime,&quot; Johnson said. &quot;To me, finishing the job is to make sure that Iran can never produce a nuclear weapon.&quot;The Wisconsin senator's comments highlight growing Republican divisions over Iran strategy, even as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/en/news/republicans-push-trump-to-finish-the-job-on-iran-as-peace-talks-collapse">GOP lawmakers push Trump to finish the job</a> against Tehran. Johnson's emphasis on permanently eliminating Iran's nuclear capability goes beyond the current ceasefire framework that has dominated recent diplomatic efforts.Johnson's definition of victory centers on Iran's nuclear program — the same issue that has complicated peace negotiations for months. His stance suggests skepticism about any deal that leaves Iranian nuclear infrastructure intact, even under international monitoring.The senator's break with Trump comes as the administration weighs its next moves following collapsed diplomatic talks. Johnson's position aligns with hardline Republicans who view temporary agreements as insufficient to protect American national security interests.For American taxpayers, the debate over defining &quot;victory&quot; carries enormous implications. A strategy focused on permanently dismantling Iran's nuclear capability could require sustained military and economic pressure, potentially lasting years and costing billions in defense spending.Johnson's comments also signal potential congressional resistance to any Iran deal that falls short of complete nuclear disarmament. Senate Republicans hold significant leverage over sanctions relief and military funding — tools essential to implementing any comprehensive Iran strategy.The timing of Johnson's remarks suggests coordination with other Republican senators who may be preparing to challenge Trump's approach if it moves toward accommodation with Tehran. This creates a political test for Trump, who must balance his desire to claim foreign policy victories against pressure from his own party to maintain maximum pressure.Watch for more Republican senators to define their own victory conditions in coming days, potentially constraining Trump's diplomatic flexibility as he weighs whether to resume military operations or pursue renewed negotiations.

Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) contradicted President Trump's weekend victory declaration over Iran, telling reporters Sunday the United States has not "won" until the Iranian regime is "completely defanged."

Trump announced Saturday that America had achieved victory in its conflict with Iran. But Johnson, speaking on Capitol Hill, said the mission remains incomplete. "We will not have won until we have completely defanged the Iranian regime," Johnson said. "To me, finishing the job is to make sure that Iran can never produce a nuclear weapon."

The Wisconsin senator's comments highlight growing Republican divisions over Iran strategy, even as GOP lawmakers push Trump to finish the job against Tehran. Johnson's emphasis on permanently eliminating Iran's nuclear capability goes beyond the current ceasefire framework that has dominated recent diplomatic efforts.

Johnson's definition of victory centers on Iran's nuclear program — the same issue that has complicated peace negotiations for months. His stance suggests skepticism about any deal that leaves Iranian nuclear infrastructure intact, even under international monitoring.

The senator's break with Trump comes as the administration weighs its next moves following collapsed diplomatic talks. Johnson's position aligns with hardline Republicans who view temporary agreements as insufficient to protect American national security interests.

For American taxpayers, the debate over defining "victory" carries enormous implications. A strategy focused on permanently dismantling Iran's nuclear capability could require sustained military and economic pressure, potentially lasting years and costing billions in defense spending.

Johnson's comments also signal potential congressional resistance to any Iran deal that falls short of complete nuclear disarmament. Senate Republicans hold significant leverage over sanctions relief and military funding — tools essential to implementing any comprehensive Iran strategy.

The timing of Johnson's remarks suggests coordination with other Republican senators who may be preparing to challenge Trump's approach if it moves toward accommodation with Tehran. This creates a political test for Trump, who must balance his desire to claim foreign policy victories against pressure from his own party to maintain maximum pressure.

Watch for more Republican senators to define their own victory conditions in coming days, potentially constraining Trump's diplomatic flexibility as he weighs whether to resume military operations or pursue renewed negotiations.

Sen. Ron Johnson contradicts Trump's victory claims, saying US must 'completely defang' Iranian regime and prevent nuclear weapons capability.