InsiderWire Staff

First lady Melania Trump hosted the 113th annual First Lady's Luncheon Thursday afternoon, with second lady Usha Vance headlining an event focused on foster care reform. Trump used the White House platform to advance her &quot;Fostering the Future&quot; initiative targeting educational opportunities for children in the foster system.The traditional luncheon, attended by congressional spouses and administration officials, marked Trump's most prominent domestic policy appearance since returning to the East Wing. Her foster care push represents a continuation of children's welfare themes from her first term, when she championed anti-bullying efforts through her &quot;Be Best&quot; campaign.Trump's &quot;Fostering the Future&quot; initiative aims to expand educational pathways for the roughly 400,000 American children currently in foster care. The program focuses on securing college scholarships, vocational training opportunities, and mentorship programs for youth aging out of the system. Nearly 20,000 foster children turn 18 each year without permanent families, often facing homelessness and unemployment.Vance's participation signals the administration's coordinated approach to social issues affecting American families. The second lady, a practicing attorney and mother of three, brings legal expertise to discussions about reforming state custody systems and interstate adoption processes.The luncheon comes as Republicans control both chambers of Congress, creating potential legislative openings for foster care reforms. Current federal spending on child welfare services totals approximately $9 billion annually across multiple agencies, with critics arguing bureaucratic inefficiencies harm vulnerable children.Trump's renewed focus on foster care reflects broader conservative emphasis on strengthening traditional family structures and reducing government dependency. The initiative targets specific policy changes including streamlined adoption procedures, expanded tax credits for adoptive families, and improved background check systems for foster parents.The event also showcased the administration's effort to present a softer public image following campaign rhetoric focused heavily on immigration enforcement and border security. Trump's children's advocacy provides a unifying message that typically draws bipartisan support from lawmakers.Foster care reform advocates expect the White House to announce specific legislative proposals within the coming weeks, potentially including expanded funding for state agencies and new federal standards for case worker training.

First lady Melania Trump hosted the 113th annual First Lady's Luncheon Thursday afternoon, with second lady Usha Vance headlining an event focused on foster care reform. Trump used the White House platform to advance her "Fostering the Future" initiative targeting educational opportunities for children in the foster system.

The traditional luncheon, attended by congressional spouses and administration officials, marked Trump's most prominent domestic policy appearance since returning to the East Wing. Her foster care push represents a continuation of children's welfare themes from her first term, when she championed anti-bullying efforts through her "Be Best" campaign.

Trump's "Fostering the Future" initiative aims to expand educational pathways for the roughly 400,000 American children currently in foster care. The program focuses on securing college scholarships, vocational training opportunities, and mentorship programs for youth aging out of the system. Nearly 20,000 foster children turn 18 each year without permanent families, often facing homelessness and unemployment.

Vance's participation signals the administration's coordinated approach to social issues affecting American families. The second lady, a practicing attorney and mother of three, brings legal expertise to discussions about reforming state custody systems and interstate adoption processes.

The luncheon comes as Republicans control both chambers of Congress, creating potential legislative openings for foster care reforms. Current federal spending on child welfare services totals approximately $9 billion annually across multiple agencies, with critics arguing bureaucratic inefficiencies harm vulnerable children.

Trump's renewed focus on foster care reflects broader conservative emphasis on strengthening traditional family structures and reducing government dependency. The initiative targets specific policy changes including streamlined adoption procedures, expanded tax credits for adoptive families, and improved background check systems for foster parents.

The event also showcased the administration's effort to present a softer public image following campaign rhetoric focused heavily on immigration enforcement and border security. Trump's children's advocacy provides a unifying message that typically draws bipartisan support from lawmakers.

Foster care reform advocates expect the White House to announce specific legislative proposals within the coming weeks, potentially including expanded funding for state agencies and new federal standards for case worker training.

First lady Melania Trump hosts 113th annual First Lady's Luncheon Thursday, featuring foster care reform initiative with second lady Usha Vance.

Melania Trump Hosts Foster Care Reform Lunch with Usha Vance

President Trump extended the Iran ceasefire indefinitely this week, citing Tehran's $500 million daily losses from the closed Strait of Hormuz, but the Iranian regime's survival exposes the strategic failure of a war that never achieved its core objective of toppling the theocracy.Trump framed the extension around financial pressure, claiming Iran is hemorrhaging cash with soldiers going unpaid and liquidity evaporating. The Strait of Hormuz remains shuttered, choking off a critical global oil artery. Yet Tehran's leadership structure remains intact despite months of bombing campaigns that destroyed military bases, economic infrastructure, and killed senior commanders.The war's outcome has left Iranian dissidents and diaspora communities feeling betrayed. Many hoped the conflict would finally end the regime that has controlled Iran for over four decades. Instead, they discovered the military campaign was designed to reshape regional power balances rather than liberate Iranian society from authoritarian rule.Giant banners now hang in Tehran's Enghelab Square declaring &quot;The Strait of Hormuz will remain closed; the entire Persian Gulf is our hunting ground&quot; — a defiant message despite the economic devastation. The regime's ability to project strength while absorbing massive losses demonstrates the limits of military pressure without clear regime-change objectives.The indefinite ceasefire extension follows <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-extends-iran-ceasefire-indefinitely-cites-fractured-tehran-government">Trump's earlier decision to extend the truce</a>, citing a &quot;fractured&quot; Tehran government. However, intelligence sources indicate <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/intel-sources-iran-retains-half-its-missiles-despite-pentagon-claims">Iran retains half its missile arsenal</a> despite Pentagon claims of successful degradation.For American taxpayers and strategic planners, the war's trajectory raises questions about achievable objectives versus resource expenditure. The conflict succeeded in damaging Iran's military capabilities and economic position but failed to produce the political transformation that would justify the costs and risks to U.S. forces.The ceasefire's indefinite nature suggests Trump recognizes the current approach cannot deliver decisive results. His rhetoric about Iran &quot;begging&quot; to reopen the strait masks the reality that neither side achieved its primary goals — Tehran wanted to break U.S. resolve, while Washington wanted regime change without the commitment required to achieve it.Watch for signs of whether Trump will pivot toward direct negotiations with Tehran's leadership or maintain the current pressure campaign that has produced economic pain but limited political change.

President Trump extended the Iran ceasefire indefinitely this week, citing Tehran's $500 million daily losses from the closed Strait of Hormuz, but the Iranian regime's survival exposes the strategic failure of a war that never achieved its core objective of toppling the theocracy.

Trump framed the extension around financial pressure, claiming Iran is hemorrhaging cash with soldiers going unpaid and liquidity evaporating. The Strait of Hormuz remains shuttered, choking off a critical global oil artery. Yet Tehran's leadership structure remains intact despite months of bombing campaigns that destroyed military bases, economic infrastructure, and killed senior commanders.

The war's outcome has left Iranian dissidents and diaspora communities feeling betrayed. Many hoped the conflict would finally end the regime that has controlled Iran for over four decades. Instead, they discovered the military campaign was designed to reshape regional power balances rather than liberate Iranian society from authoritarian rule.

Giant banners now hang in Tehran's Enghelab Square declaring "The Strait of Hormuz will remain closed; the entire Persian Gulf is our hunting ground" — a defiant message despite the economic devastation. The regime's ability to project strength while absorbing massive losses demonstrates the limits of military pressure without clear regime-change objectives.

The indefinite ceasefire extension follows Trump's earlier decision to extend the truce, citing a "fractured" Tehran government. However, intelligence sources indicate Iran retains half its missile arsenal despite Pentagon claims of successful degradation.

For American taxpayers and strategic planners, the war's trajectory raises questions about achievable objectives versus resource expenditure. The conflict succeeded in damaging Iran's military capabilities and economic position but failed to produce the political transformation that would justify the costs and risks to U.S. forces.

The ceasefire's indefinite nature suggests Trump recognizes the current approach cannot deliver decisive results. His rhetoric about Iran "begging" to reopen the strait masks the reality that neither side achieved its primary goals — Tehran wanted to break U.S. resolve, while Washington wanted regime change without the commitment required to achieve it.

Watch for signs of whether Trump will pivot toward direct negotiations with Tehran's leadership or maintain the current pressure campaign that has produced economic pain but limited political change.

Trump extends Iran ceasefire indefinitely as Tehran loses $500 million daily from Strait of Hormuz closure, but regime survival marks strategic failure for U.S.

Iran Regime Survives War Despite $500M Daily Losses, Trump Extends Ceasefire

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an order Thursday reclassifying marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act, delivering on President Trump's executive order from four months ago directing the change.The reclassification moves marijuana out of the same category as heroin, LSD, MDMA and synthetic opioids into Schedule III alongside ketamine, anabolic steroids and testosterone. Blanche announced the move on X, saying the Justice Department was &quot;delivering on President Trump's promise to improve American healthcare.&quot;&quot;These actions will enable more targeted, rigorous research into marijuana's safety and efficacy, expanding patients' access to treatments and empowering doctors to make better-informed healthcare decisions,&quot; Blanche wrote.The move comes days after Trump complained federal officials were &quot;slow-walking&quot; the marijuana rescheduling process during a signing ceremony for a separate executive order on psychedelic drug research. &quot;You're going to get the rescheduling done, right, please?&quot; Trump pressed off-camera officials. &quot;You know, they're slow-walking me on rescheduling. You're going to get it done, right?&quot;For Americans expecting immediate changes, the rescheduling delivers limited practical impact. Marijuana remains federally illegal and the change won't affect sentences for those already incarcerated on possession charges. Banking restrictions persist due to anti-money laundering laws, and interstate transport of Schedule III drugs still requires federal authorization.The timing reflects broader federal policy shifts as 40 states have already legalized marijuana in some form. Legal states face massive oversupply driving wholesale price crashes in what industry observers call the &quot;ganja glut.&quot; Federal rescheduling opens doors for expanded medical research but stops short of the full legalization many advocates seek.The marijuana move parallels Trump's push to fast-track psychedelic drug reviews, including ibogaine from West African shrub root bark. Both initiatives signal the administration's willingness to challenge decades-old federal drug classifications that critics argue stifle medical research and patient access.The rescheduling represents the most significant federal marijuana policy change in decades, though it leaves key questions about banking, interstate commerce, and state-federal conflicts unresolved. Watch for how states and the cannabis industry respond to the new federal framework.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed an order Thursday reclassifying marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act, delivering on President Trump's executive order from four months ago directing the change.

The reclassification moves marijuana out of the same category as heroin, LSD, MDMA and synthetic opioids into Schedule III alongside ketamine, anabolic steroids and testosterone. Blanche announced the move on X, saying the Justice Department was "delivering on President Trump's promise to improve American healthcare."

"These actions will enable more targeted, rigorous research into marijuana's safety and efficacy, expanding patients' access to treatments and empowering doctors to make better-informed healthcare decisions," Blanche wrote.

The move comes days after Trump complained federal officials were "slow-walking" the marijuana rescheduling process during a signing ceremony for a separate executive order on psychedelic drug research. "You're going to get the rescheduling done, right, please?" Trump pressed off-camera officials. "You know, they're slow-walking me on rescheduling. You're going to get it done, right?"

For Americans expecting immediate changes, the rescheduling delivers limited practical impact. Marijuana remains federally illegal and the change won't affect sentences for those already incarcerated on possession charges. Banking restrictions persist due to anti-money laundering laws, and interstate transport of Schedule III drugs still requires federal authorization.

The timing reflects broader federal policy shifts as 40 states have already legalized marijuana in some form. Legal states face massive oversupply driving wholesale price crashes in what industry observers call the "ganja glut." Federal rescheduling opens doors for expanded medical research but stops short of the full legalization many advocates seek.

The marijuana move parallels Trump's push to fast-track psychedelic drug reviews, including ibogaine from West African shrub root bark. Both initiatives signal the administration's willingness to challenge decades-old federal drug classifications that critics argue stifle medical research and patient access.

The rescheduling represents the most significant federal marijuana policy change in decades, though it leaves key questions about banking, interstate commerce, and state-federal conflicts unresolved. Watch for how states and the cannabis industry respond to the new federal framework.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche signed order Thursday moving marijuana from same category as heroin to lower Schedule III alongside ketamine.

Trump Moves Marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III Drug Classification

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday that Iran's seizure of two ships in the Strait of Hormuz does not violate President Trump's ceasefire because the vessels were not American or Israeli flagged.Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps captured the Greek-flagged MSC Francesca and the Mediterranean-flagged Epaminondas on Wednesday, moving them into Iranian waters after the ships reportedly came under fire. The crews' fate remains unknown.&quot;No, because these were not U.S. ships. These were not Israeli ships. These were two international vessels,&quot; Leavitt told Fox News' Martha McCallum when asked if Trump viewed the seizures as ceasefire violations.Leavitt dismissed the incident as piracy, arguing it shows Iran's military weakness rather than strength. &quot;Iran has gone from having the most lethal Navy in the Middle East to now acting like a bunch of pirates,&quot; she said. &quot;These two ships were taken by speedy gunboats.&quot;The press secretary said the seizures prove Trump's military strikes have been effective, claiming the president &quot;completely obliterated Iran's conventional Navy.&quot; Iran's Revolutionary Guard said the vessels lacked proper authorization and had tampered with navigation systems, though these claims could not be independently verified.Leavitt emphasized that while kinetic military action has paused, economic pressure continues through &quot;Operation Economic Fury.&quot; The U.S. naval blockade targets ships traveling to and from Iranian ports, maintaining what she called &quot;economic leverage&quot; over Tehran.The incident comes as <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/hegseth-fires-navy-secretary-phelan-as-us-forces-guard-hormuz-strait">U.S. forces continue guarding</a> the critical shipping lane. The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 20% of global oil traffic, making any disruption a potential threat to American energy security and global markets.Leavitt accused American media of &quot;blowing this out of proportion to discredit the president's facts,&quot; arguing the blockade remains &quot;incredibly effective&quot; despite Wednesday's seizures. She maintained that Iran no longer controls the strait despite the Revolutionary Guard's continued ability to harass commercial shipping.The White House position suggests Trump's ceasefire terms apply only to direct attacks on U.S. and Israeli assets, potentially giving Iran room to target third-country vessels without triggering renewed American military action. This interpretation could concern European allies whose ships traverse the busy waterway daily.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday that Iran's seizure of two ships in the Strait of Hormuz does not violate President Trump's ceasefire because the vessels were not American or Israeli flagged.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps captured the Greek-flagged MSC Francesca and the Mediterranean-flagged Epaminondas on Wednesday, moving them into Iranian waters after the ships reportedly came under fire. The crews' fate remains unknown.

"No, because these were not U.S. ships. These were not Israeli ships. These were two international vessels," Leavitt told Fox News' Martha McCallum when asked if Trump viewed the seizures as ceasefire violations.

Leavitt dismissed the incident as piracy, arguing it shows Iran's military weakness rather than strength. "Iran has gone from having the most lethal Navy in the Middle East to now acting like a bunch of pirates," she said. "These two ships were taken by speedy gunboats."

The press secretary said the seizures prove Trump's military strikes have been effective, claiming the president "completely obliterated Iran's conventional Navy." Iran's Revolutionary Guard said the vessels lacked proper authorization and had tampered with navigation systems, though these claims could not be independently verified.

Leavitt emphasized that while kinetic military action has paused, economic pressure continues through "Operation Economic Fury." The U.S. naval blockade targets ships traveling to and from Iranian ports, maintaining what she called "economic leverage" over Tehran.

The incident comes as U.S. forces continue guarding the critical shipping lane. The Strait of Hormuz handles roughly 20% of global oil traffic, making any disruption a potential threat to American energy security and global markets.

Leavitt accused American media of "blowing this out of proportion to discredit the president's facts," arguing the blockade remains "incredibly effective" despite Wednesday's seizures. She maintained that Iran no longer controls the strait despite the Revolutionary Guard's continued ability to harass commercial shipping.

The White House position suggests Trump's ceasefire terms apply only to direct attacks on U.S. and Israeli assets, potentially giving Iran room to target third-country vessels without triggering renewed American military action. This interpretation could concern European allies whose ships traverse the busy waterway daily.

Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt says Iran's seizure of Greek and Mediterranean ships in Strait of Hormuz doesn't violate Trump's ceasefire agreement.

White House: Iran Ship Seizures Don't Break Ceasefire — Only U.S., Israeli Vessels Count

The Trump administration wants to expand access to private equity and cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) retirement plans, a move that could reshape how millions of Americans save for retirement while exposing them to higher-risk investments traditionally reserved for wealthy investors.The push comes as private equity firms and cryptocurrency companies lobby for broader access to the $7 trillion 401(k) market. Currently, most workplace retirement plans limit employees to traditional investments like mutual funds, index funds, and target-date funds that provide steady, diversified exposure to stocks and bonds.Private equity investments typically require minimum commitments of $1 million or more and lock up investor money for years at a time. These funds invest in private companies, real estate, and other assets that can't be easily sold. Cryptocurrency markets have shown extreme volatility, with Bitcoin alone losing over 70% of its value in 2022 before recovering.Financial advisors warn that adding these complex investments to 401(k) menus could confuse workers who lack sophisticated investment knowledge. Unlike traditional mutual funds that price daily and allow withdrawals, private equity investments often take years to mature and may not provide regular valuations. This creates challenges for employees who need to rebalance portfolios or access funds during emergencies.The timing puts American workers' retirement security at the center of a policy debate about investment access and protection. Supporters argue that wealthy investors have long benefited from alternative investments that can provide higher returns and diversification. They contend that excluding middle-class savers from these opportunities perpetuates wealth inequality.Critics counter that 401(k) plans serve a different purpose than private wealth management. Most employees make investment decisions quickly during enrollment periods and rarely revisit their choices. Adding volatile or illiquid investments to these menus could lead to poor outcomes for workers who don't understand the risks or time horizons involved.The proposal would likely require regulatory changes at the Department of Labor, which oversees 401(k) plan rules and fiduciary standards. Plan sponsors and employers would need to evaluate whether offering alternative investments serves their employees' best interests while managing their own liability exposure.Previous attempts to expand alternative investments in retirement plans have faced resistance from consumer advocates and some members of Congress who argue that workplace retirement plans should prioritize safety and simplicity over exotic investment options.The move reflects Trump's broader deregulatory approach and support for expanding investment choices across financial markets. Watch for Department of Labor guidance on implementation timelines and which types of alternative investments might qualify for 401(k) inclusion first.

The Trump administration wants to expand access to private equity and cryptocurrency investments in 401(k) retirement plans, a move that could reshape how millions of Americans save for retirement while exposing them to higher-risk investments traditionally reserved for wealthy investors.

The push comes as private equity firms and cryptocurrency companies lobby for broader access to the $7 trillion 401(k) market. Currently, most workplace retirement plans limit employees to traditional investments like mutual funds, index funds, and target-date funds that provide steady, diversified exposure to stocks and bonds.

Private equity investments typically require minimum commitments of $1 million or more and lock up investor money for years at a time. These funds invest in private companies, real estate, and other assets that can't be easily sold. Cryptocurrency markets have shown extreme volatility, with Bitcoin alone losing over 70% of its value in 2022 before recovering.

Financial advisors warn that adding these complex investments to 401(k) menus could confuse workers who lack sophisticated investment knowledge. Unlike traditional mutual funds that price daily and allow withdrawals, private equity investments often take years to mature and may not provide regular valuations. This creates challenges for employees who need to rebalance portfolios or access funds during emergencies.

The timing puts American workers' retirement security at the center of a policy debate about investment access and protection. Supporters argue that wealthy investors have long benefited from alternative investments that can provide higher returns and diversification. They contend that excluding middle-class savers from these opportunities perpetuates wealth inequality.

Critics counter that 401(k) plans serve a different purpose than private wealth management. Most employees make investment decisions quickly during enrollment periods and rarely revisit their choices. Adding volatile or illiquid investments to these menus could lead to poor outcomes for workers who don't understand the risks or time horizons involved.

The proposal would likely require regulatory changes at the Department of Labor, which oversees 401(k) plan rules and fiduciary standards. Plan sponsors and employers would need to evaluate whether offering alternative investments serves their employees' best interests while managing their own liability exposure.

Previous attempts to expand alternative investments in retirement plans have faced resistance from consumer advocates and some members of Congress who argue that workplace retirement plans should prioritize safety and simplicity over exotic investment options.

The move reflects Trump's broader deregulatory approach and support for expanding investment choices across financial markets. Watch for Department of Labor guidance on implementation timelines and which types of alternative investments might qualify for 401(k) inclusion first.

Trump administration moves to expand alternative investments in retirement accounts as financial experts warn of volatility and complexity risks for workers.

Trump Pushes Private Equity, Crypto Access in 401(k)s Despite Risk Warnings

Phone wait times at the Social Security Administration run more than 10 times longer than the agency advertises on its website — if calls get answered at all — according to a new Democratic Senate investigation led by Elizabeth Warren.The Massachusetts senator's report documented what it called &quot;customer service chaos&quot; affecting millions of older Americans and disabled citizens who depend on Social Security services. Warren blamed the Trump administration for what she termed &quot;catastrophic&quot; cuts to the agency's operations.The investigation found massive gaps between the SSA's published wait time estimates and actual customer experiences. Callers faced extended delays that far exceeded agency promises, with many calls going unanswered entirely.The findings highlight a growing accountability problem at an agency that processes benefits for 67 million Americans. Social Security recipients — many of them seniors on fixed incomes — depend on phone access to resolve benefit issues, update personal information, and navigate complex federal requirements.Warren's team documented the service breakdown as part of broader Democratic criticism of federal agency management under the previous administration. The report comes as Republicans push for <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/senate-gop-launches-140b-immigration-fund-to-cut-out-democrats">streamlined federal spending</a> through reconciliation measures that could affect agency budgets.For American taxpayers, the SSA dysfunction represents a classic government accountability failure. Citizens pay into Social Security their entire working lives, only to face bureaucratic stonewalling when they need basic services. The agency collects over $1 trillion annually in payroll taxes but apparently cannot staff phone lines adequately.The service crisis particularly impacts older Americans who rely more heavily on phone communication than younger demographics comfortable with online portals. Many Social Security questions require human interaction to resolve, making phone access essential rather than optional.Warren's investigation adds ammunition to Democratic arguments that federal agencies need more funding rather than efficiency reforms. Republicans counter that better management, not bigger budgets, would solve customer service problems across government.The timing puts pressure on the current administration to address SSA operations while Congress debates broader federal spending priorities. Social Security represents the government's largest expenditure and touches nearly every American family.Watch for Republican responses to Warren's findings and whether SSA leadership commits to specific wait time improvements with measurable deadlines.

Phone wait times at the Social Security Administration run more than 10 times longer than the agency advertises on its website — if calls get answered at all — according to a new Democratic Senate investigation led by Elizabeth Warren.

The Massachusetts senator's report documented what it called "customer service chaos" affecting millions of older Americans and disabled citizens who depend on Social Security services. Warren blamed the Trump administration for what she termed "catastrophic" cuts to the agency's operations.

The investigation found massive gaps between the SSA's published wait time estimates and actual customer experiences. Callers faced extended delays that far exceeded agency promises, with many calls going unanswered entirely.

The findings highlight a growing accountability problem at an agency that processes benefits for 67 million Americans. Social Security recipients — many of them seniors on fixed incomes — depend on phone access to resolve benefit issues, update personal information, and navigate complex federal requirements.

Warren's team documented the service breakdown as part of broader Democratic criticism of federal agency management under the previous administration. The report comes as Republicans push for streamlined federal spending through reconciliation measures that could affect agency budgets.

For American taxpayers, the SSA dysfunction represents a classic government accountability failure. Citizens pay into Social Security their entire working lives, only to face bureaucratic stonewalling when they need basic services. The agency collects over $1 trillion annually in payroll taxes but apparently cannot staff phone lines adequately.

The service crisis particularly impacts older Americans who rely more heavily on phone communication than younger demographics comfortable with online portals. Many Social Security questions require human interaction to resolve, making phone access essential rather than optional.

Warren's investigation adds ammunition to Democratic arguments that federal agencies need more funding rather than efficiency reforms. Republicans counter that better management, not bigger budgets, would solve customer service problems across government.

The timing puts pressure on the current administration to address SSA operations while Congress debates broader federal spending priorities. Social Security represents the government's largest expenditure and touches nearly every American family.

Watch for Republican responses to Warren's findings and whether SSA leadership commits to specific wait time improvements with measurable deadlines.

Democratic senators find Social Security Administration phone wait times exceeded agency claims by more than 10 times, creating service chaos for seniors.

Warren Report: Social Security Phone Wait Times 10x Longer Than Advertised

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan immediately, the Pentagon announced through chief spokesperson Sean Parnell. Phelan's removal comes as US naval forces maintain a blockade on Iranian ports and heavy presence around the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of global oil and gas flows during peacetime.The Pentagon gave no official reason for the dismissal, but reports indicate the decision stemmed from internal disputes and tensions between Phelan and Hegseth. Phelan also faced an ethics investigation that weakened his standing within the Trump administration, according to Reuters.Phelan, appointed in 2024 as a Trump political ally, brought no prior military or defense leadership experience to the role. The businessman and investment executive previously served as a major Republican donor and fundraiser before entering government. His tenure quickly became controversial due to criticism over slow progress on shipbuilding reforms and strained relationships with key Pentagon figures, including Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg.Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao will serve as acting secretary. The 54-year-old brings 25 years of Navy experience to the role, though he unsuccessfully ran as a Republican candidate for Senate in 2022 and House in 2024. Cao reportedly had a difficult relationship with Phelan during their overlapping service.Senate Armed Services Committee ranking Democrat Jack Reed called the firing &quot;troubling&quot; and criticized broader Pentagon instability. &quot;I am concerned it is yet another example of the instability and dysfunction that have come to define the Department of Defense under President Trump and Secretary Hegseth,&quot; Reed said.The dismissal continues a pattern of senior military leadership changes during the ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran and since Trump's re-election. As Navy's top civilian official, Phelan oversaw recruiting, mobilization, organization, and ship construction and repair operations.&quot;On behalf of the Secretary of War and Deputy Secretary of War, we are grateful to Secretary Phelan for his service to the Department and the United States Navy,&quot; Parnell said. &quot;We wish him well in his future endeavours.&quot;The leadership change occurs at a critical moment for US naval operations in the Middle East, with <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/trump-extends-iran-ceasefire-indefinitely-cites-fractured-tehran-government">ceasefire negotiations</a> continuing amid military tensions. Watch for how Cao's Navy background influences shipbuilding priorities and Pentagon relationships moving forward.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan immediately, the Pentagon announced through chief spokesperson Sean Parnell. Phelan's removal comes as US naval forces maintain a blockade on Iranian ports and heavy presence around the Strait of Hormuz, through which 20 percent of global oil and gas flows during peacetime.

The Pentagon gave no official reason for the dismissal, but reports indicate the decision stemmed from internal disputes and tensions between Phelan and Hegseth. Phelan also faced an ethics investigation that weakened his standing within the Trump administration, according to Reuters.

Phelan, appointed in 2024 as a Trump political ally, brought no prior military or defense leadership experience to the role. The businessman and investment executive previously served as a major Republican donor and fundraiser before entering government. His tenure quickly became controversial due to criticism over slow progress on shipbuilding reforms and strained relationships with key Pentagon figures, including Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg.

Navy Undersecretary Hung Cao will serve as acting secretary. The 54-year-old brings 25 years of Navy experience to the role, though he unsuccessfully ran as a Republican candidate for Senate in 2022 and House in 2024. Cao reportedly had a difficult relationship with Phelan during their overlapping service.

Senate Armed Services Committee ranking Democrat Jack Reed called the firing "troubling" and criticized broader Pentagon instability. "I am concerned it is yet another example of the instability and dysfunction that have come to define the Department of Defense under President Trump and Secretary Hegseth," Reed said.

The dismissal continues a pattern of senior military leadership changes during the ongoing US-Israeli war with Iran and since Trump's re-election. As Navy's top civilian official, Phelan oversaw recruiting, mobilization, organization, and ship construction and repair operations.

"On behalf of the Secretary of War and Deputy Secretary of War, we are grateful to Secretary Phelan for his service to the Department and the United States Navy," Parnell said. "We wish him well in his future endeavours."

The leadership change occurs at a critical moment for US naval operations in the Middle East, with ceasefire negotiations continuing amid military tensions. Watch for how Cao's Navy background influences shipbuilding priorities and Pentagon relationships moving forward.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth fired Navy Secretary John Phelan amid tensions and ethics probe. Navy veteran Hung Cao takes over as acting secretary.

Hegseth Fires Navy Secretary Phelan as US Forces Guard Hormuz Strait

Senate Republicans adopted a budget resolution early Thursday that clears the path for $140 billion in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of President Trump's term, cutting Democrats out of the process entirely.The vote came after an all-night marathon session where lawmakers pushed through amendment after amendment. Republicans want to front-load both agencies with over $70 billion upfront, betting Democrats will never agree to fund immigration enforcement again if they regain control.Only two Republicans broke ranks: Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted against the budget blueprint. The measure now unlocks the budget reconciliation process, allowing Republicans to pass immigration funding with a simple majority and no Democratic support.Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer blasted the GOP plan during floor debate. &quot;America is crying out for relief from high costs, and you're here adding $140 billion to an agency that nobody — two groups — Border Patrol and ICE, that nobody respects in this country,&quot; Schumer said.Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso fired back, defending the agents and attacking Democrats. &quot;Today's Democrats are a rogue and radical party,&quot; Barrasso said. &quot;You deserve better than reckless Democrat hostage-taking. You deserve the tools and support from Congress necessary to carry out the mission Congress has given you.&quot;Republicans moved to reconciliation after Democrats refused to fund ICE and Customs and Border Protection without what GOP leaders called &quot;stringent reforms.&quot; The standoff has contributed to a partial government shutdown affecting parts of the Department of Homeland Security.Democrats tried repeatedly to amend the budget blueprint with provisions targeting affordability and economic issues, but all failed along party lines. The night featured what sources described as &quot;a dash of drama,&quot; though the article text cuts off before detailing those moments.The budget resolution represents the first major legislative victory for Senate Republicans as they work to <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/senate-gop-launches-vote-a-rama-to-lock-in-ice-funding-through-2028">lock in immigration enforcement funding</a> for the remainder of Trump's presidency. Republicans argue the agencies need stable, long-term funding to carry out border security and interior enforcement operations.The reconciliation process now moves to the next phase, where Republicans will craft the actual spending legislation. With Democrats shut out of negotiations, the GOP can move quickly to get funding to immigration enforcement agencies that have been operating under continuing resolutions and partial funding.

Senate Republicans adopted a budget resolution early Thursday that clears the path for $140 billion in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol through the end of President Trump's term, cutting Democrats out of the process entirely.

The vote came after an all-night marathon session where lawmakers pushed through amendment after amendment. Republicans want to front-load both agencies with over $70 billion upfront, betting Democrats will never agree to fund immigration enforcement again if they regain control.

Only two Republicans broke ranks: Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voted against the budget blueprint. The measure now unlocks the budget reconciliation process, allowing Republicans to pass immigration funding with a simple majority and no Democratic support.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer blasted the GOP plan during floor debate. "America is crying out for relief from high costs, and you're here adding $140 billion to an agency that nobody — two groups — Border Patrol and ICE, that nobody respects in this country," Schumer said.

Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso fired back, defending the agents and attacking Democrats. "Today's Democrats are a rogue and radical party," Barrasso said. "You deserve better than reckless Democrat hostage-taking. You deserve the tools and support from Congress necessary to carry out the mission Congress has given you."

Republicans moved to reconciliation after Democrats refused to fund ICE and Customs and Border Protection without what GOP leaders called "stringent reforms." The standoff has contributed to a partial government shutdown affecting parts of the Department of Homeland Security.

Democrats tried repeatedly to amend the budget blueprint with provisions targeting affordability and economic issues, but all failed along party lines. The night featured what sources described as "a dash of drama," though the article text cuts off before detailing those moments.

The budget resolution represents the first major legislative victory for Senate Republicans as they work to lock in immigration enforcement funding for the remainder of Trump's presidency. Republicans argue the agencies need stable, long-term funding to carry out border security and interior enforcement operations.

The reconciliation process now moves to the next phase, where Republicans will craft the actual spending legislation. With Democrats shut out of negotiations, the GOP can move quickly to get funding to immigration enforcement agencies that have been operating under continuing resolutions and partial funding.

Senate Republicans pass budget resolution early Thursday to fund immigration enforcement agencies through Trump's term, bypassing Democrats in reconciliation pr

Senate GOP Adopts $140B Budget Blueprint for ICE, Border Patrol Through 2028

Senate Republicans pass budget resolution early Thursday to fund immigration enforcement agencies through Trump's term, bypassing Democrats in reconciliation process.

Democrats scored a major victory in Virginia's redistricting referendum Tuesday, potentially flipping the state's congressional delegation from a 6-5 split to a 10-1 Democratic advantage and adding up to four House seats for their 2026 midterm fight.The win comes as an unprecedented wave of mid-decade redistricting sweeps the nation, triggered by President Trump's push for Republicans to redraw maps in Texas and other states. Trump told reporters in July 2025 his plan was simple: &quot;Texas would be the biggest one. Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats.&quot;By August, Texas Republicans delivered, passing new maps that secure five additional GOP House seats. Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio followed with redistricting expected to net Republicans another three to four seats total.Democrats fired back with their own map changes in California and Utah, creating about six new Democrat-dominated districts. <a href="https://insiderwire.com/news/jeffries-calls-virginia-redistrict-win-temporary-response-to-trump-power-grab">Virginia's redistricting victory</a> largely neutralizes the Republican gains, political strategists say.&quot;This could shift Virginia from a 6-5 split to something like 10-1 Democratic,&quot; political adviser Rina Shah told Al Jazeera, noting the change would &quot;dramatically tighten the fight for House control in the 2026 midterms.&quot;The timing matters. Republicans face headwinds from voter concerns over the ongoing US-Israeli conflict in Iran and persistent inflation. Democratic control of either chamber would cripple Trump's legislative agenda in his final two years.But experts warn the tit-for-tat redistricting war threatens American democracy itself. &quot;Virginia's unorthodox redistricting isn't just a map redraw, it's a mid-decade power play in a national arms race,&quot; Shah said. &quot;In a cycle defined by retaliation over reform, this sets a precedent: when one side bends the rules, the other follows, until courts or voters draw the final line.&quot;The escalation breaks decades of tradition limiting redistricting to once per decade following the U.S. Census. Now both parties treat congressional maps as weapons to deploy whenever politically convenient.Florida looms as the next battleground, with Republican operatives eyeing their own redistricting push that could erase Democratic gains. The Sunshine State's 28 House seats make it a prime target for map manipulation.The redistricting arms race transforms what was once a predictable decennial process into ongoing political warfare. Each side justifies their moves as defensive responses to the other's aggression, creating a cycle that threatens to make gerrymandering the norm rather than the exception.All eyes turn to Florida and other potential redistricting targets as both parties calculate their next moves in this high-stakes game of musical chairs with American representation hanging in the balance.

Democrats scored a major victory in Virginia's redistricting referendum Tuesday, potentially flipping the state's congressional delegation from a 6-5 split to a 10-1 Democratic advantage and adding up to four House seats for their 2026 midterm fight.

The win comes as an unprecedented wave of mid-decade redistricting sweeps the nation, triggered by President Trump's push for Republicans to redraw maps in Texas and other states. Trump told reporters in July 2025 his plan was simple: "Texas would be the biggest one. Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats."

By August, Texas Republicans delivered, passing new maps that secure five additional GOP House seats. Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio followed with redistricting expected to net Republicans another three to four seats total.

Democrats fired back with their own map changes in California and Utah, creating about six new Democrat-dominated districts. Virginia's redistricting victory largely neutralizes the Republican gains, political strategists say.

"This could shift Virginia from a 6-5 split to something like 10-1 Democratic," political adviser Rina Shah told Al Jazeera, noting the change would "dramatically tighten the fight for House control in the 2026 midterms."

The timing matters. Republicans face headwinds from voter concerns over the ongoing US-Israeli conflict in Iran and persistent inflation. Democratic control of either chamber would cripple Trump's legislative agenda in his final two years.

But experts warn the tit-for-tat redistricting war threatens American democracy itself. "Virginia's unorthodox redistricting isn't just a map redraw, it's a mid-decade power play in a national arms race," Shah said. "In a cycle defined by retaliation over reform, this sets a precedent: when one side bends the rules, the other follows, until courts or voters draw the final line."

The escalation breaks decades of tradition limiting redistricting to once per decade following the U.S. Census. Now both parties treat congressional maps as weapons to deploy whenever politically convenient.

Florida looms as the next battleground, with Republican operatives eyeing their own redistricting push that could erase Democratic gains. The Sunshine State's 28 House seats make it a prime target for map manipulation.

The redistricting arms race transforms what was once a predictable decennial process into ongoing political warfare. Each side justifies their moves as defensive responses to the other's aggression, creating a cycle that threatens to make gerrymandering the norm rather than the exception.

All eyes turn to Florida and other potential redistricting targets as both parties calculate their next moves in this high-stakes game of musical chairs with American representation hanging in the balance.

Virginia Democrats secure up to 4 House seats through redistricting as Trump pushes Texas map changes. Experts warn of dangerous precedent for future elections.

Democrats Win Virginia Redistricting — But GOP Eyes Florida Counterstrike

Israeli soldiers are systematically looting homes and businesses across southern Lebanon, loading stolen goods into their vehicles while commanders look the other way, according to testimonies obtained by Haaretz from sources stationed in the country.The stolen items include motorcycles, televisions, paintings, sofas, and carpets. One soldier described the scope as happening on an &quot;insane scale,&quot; telling the Israeli newspaper that troops openly steal without attempting to hide their actions.&quot;Anyone who takes something — televisions, cigarettes, tools or whatever — immediately puts it in their vehicle or puts it aside, not inside the post, but it's not done in secret,&quot; the soldier said. &quot;Everyone sees and understands.&quot;The report reveals that both senior and junior commanders are aware of the widespread looting but have failed to take disciplinary action to stop it. This directly contradicts official Israeli army statements claiming the military is pursuing disciplinary measures against such behavior.According to the testimonies, troops load their vehicles with stolen equipment in plain view of their units, making no effort to conceal their actions from fellow soldiers or superiors. The brazen nature of the thefts suggests a complete breakdown in military discipline within the occupied territory.The looting allegations come as Israeli forces maintain control over portions of southern Lebanon, raising questions about military accountability and the protection of civilian property during occupation. For American taxpayers who provide Israel with $3.8 billion in annual military aid, these reports highlight potential misuse of U.S.-supplied equipment and training.The systematic nature of the thefts, combined with command-level awareness and inaction, points to institutional problems within Israeli forces operating in Lebanon rather than isolated incidents by individual soldiers.The Israeli military's public claims about addressing misconduct appear undermined by on-ground realities described by its own troops, creating a credibility gap that could complicate diplomatic efforts in the region and strain relationships with international partners who expect adherence to military standards.

Israeli soldiers are systematically looting homes and businesses across southern Lebanon, loading stolen goods into their vehicles while commanders look the other way, according to testimonies obtained by Haaretz from sources stationed in the country.

The stolen items include motorcycles, televisions, paintings, sofas, and carpets. One soldier described the scope as happening on an "insane scale," telling the Israeli newspaper that troops openly steal without attempting to hide their actions.

"Anyone who takes something — televisions, cigarettes, tools or whatever — immediately puts it in their vehicle or puts it aside, not inside the post, but it's not done in secret," the soldier said. "Everyone sees and understands."

The report reveals that both senior and junior commanders are aware of the widespread looting but have failed to take disciplinary action to stop it. This directly contradicts official Israeli army statements claiming the military is pursuing disciplinary measures against such behavior.

According to the testimonies, troops load their vehicles with stolen equipment in plain view of their units, making no effort to conceal their actions from fellow soldiers or superiors. The brazen nature of the thefts suggests a complete breakdown in military discipline within the occupied territory.

The looting allegations come as Israeli forces maintain control over portions of southern Lebanon, raising questions about military accountability and the protection of civilian property during occupation. For American taxpayers who provide Israel with $3.8 billion in annual military aid, these reports highlight potential misuse of U.S.-supplied equipment and training.

The systematic nature of the thefts, combined with command-level awareness and inaction, points to institutional problems within Israeli forces operating in Lebanon rather than isolated incidents by individual soldiers.

The Israeli military's public claims about addressing misconduct appear undermined by on-ground realities described by its own troops, creating a credibility gap that could complicate diplomatic efforts in the region and strain relationships with international partners who expect adherence to military standards.

Israeli soldiers are systematically looting homes and businesses in southern Lebanon, with officers ignoring disciplinary orders, according to testimonies from 

Israeli Troops Looting Lebanon Homes on 'Insane Scale' — Officers Ignore Orders

Israeli soldiers are systematically looting homes and businesses in southern Lebanon, with officers ignoring disciplinary orders, according to testimonies from troops.